IdiotInCharge
NVIDIA SHILL
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2003
- Messages
- 14,675
My main concern with Intel's GPU products is their lacking track record when it comes to driver support. Performance means little if your game or PC keeps crashing, so I hope they don't skimp on this in the future.
They got allot to prove before I can take them seriously.
I'd put them even with AMD or better. Intel has been focusing on their GPU drivers for some time now, despite having limited hardware to work with.
Iris has always been a premium laptop part first, and a desktop part as an afterthought (the original Broadwell+eDRAM processors were designed for the 13" Macbook Pro). It eventually trickled down into a handful of really expensive Japanese ultrabooks, but never gained much traction elsewhere.
They made a NUC-like minicomputer with it too, but yeah, very little market penetration. I assume the extra cost and TDP put their IRIS parts into a niche just too small for most markets, in that the savings in size wasn't worth the trade off of higher cost and TDP- said TDP increase possibly cancelling the potential size savings due to cooling versus a discrete part, if the cost argument didn't win first.
Of note, though: HBM on a smaller scale would make a compelling argument (for AMD too!)- the SRAM in Intel IRIS parts was fast enough to be used as an L3 (L4?) cache for the CPU as well while also being very small; HBM would keep the bandwidth and likely lower BoM and thermals, but wouldn't be as useful to the CPU.