Intel wants in on that TSMC money.
https://www.theverge.com/2021/3/23/...ps-outsourcing-foundry-services-manufacturing
https://www.theverge.com/2021/3/23/...ps-outsourcing-foundry-services-manufacturing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Intel Foundry Services is a “standalone foundry business unit,” and it will develop x86, Arm, and RISC-V core chips for external clients using Intel’s manufacturing technology.
No, this sounds more like Global Foundries 2.0.Maybe Intel wants in on that AMD money...
Maybe Intel wants in on that AMD money...
https://www.anandtech.com/show/1657...ndry-services-ibm-collaboration-return-of-idfAll glory to 14nm!
All glory to (14/2)nm!https://www.anandtech.com/show/1657...ndry-services-ibm-collaboration-return-of-idf
7nm according to Anandtech.
Well, maybe someone should tell them that it's gonna take a HELL of a lot MOAR money than that if they ever hope to catch up to, let alone compete with, TSMC.... but at present, $20B is a proverbial "drop in the bucket" for them though..If their can foundry can catch up to TSMC then they would love to get contracts from Apple, Qualcomm and Nvidia etc.
It's also a backup diversification plan in case x86 fades out to ARM.
Call them crippletsAll glory to (14/2)nm!
I'm going to reserve judgment until I see their 10nm Xeons which should be hitting in the next month or 2, I really do need that work station and I don't want to pull the trigger on a 3970x at this stage because Intel and AMD should have something ready to go in the ball park any day now on the new series.Well, maybe someone should tell them that it's gonna take a HELL of a lot MOAR money than that if they ever hope to catch up to, let alone compete with, TSMC.... but at present, $20B is a proverbial "drop in the bucket" for them though..
And yes, I would say they could very well be preparing for the eventual demise of X86, as they know that the fruity boys (and nGreediya) are on to something now with their new ARM plans, and they would absolutely hate to see that as a singular reason why they die and or fade into the annals of history, which WILL happen if they don't get their collective shiitzu together and finally move beyond their pathetic 14nm++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ clusterfudgecrapola
Intel wants AMD money when they just spent 2-3x what AMD is worth
Yeah they are saying they have their 10 and 7nm issues worked out and that the new fabs will be their 7nm which based on the fact that TSMC was able to pick up Intel's slack on the DoE supercomputer means that the Intel 7nm is roughly equivalent to the TSMC 5nm. Intel's previous foundry attempts were doomed because Intel would not rent out time on their current processes only ones that were a gen or two behind and nobody really wanted that at any volume, not when there were viable alternatives elsewhere that were cheaper as they weren't carrying the big Intel brand name behind them.Intel has been in the foundry business for a long time - this is a response to Elliott Capital trying to force them to divest that business (Elliott is generally clueless IMHO in the Tech space) like AMD did in the early 2000s (mostly because that would generate shareholder returns in the short term for Elliott, while ... not in the long run). Hedge funds. Fuck em.
Instead, Gelsinger is doubling down - which is probably a good idea, given that foundry space is going to be more and more in demand over the next 20 years - and going to expand their presence there instead.
edit: Given how long it takes to BUILD a foundry, this isn't about 14nm - but 7/5/whatever comes in the future.
Bingo. As that business grows, renting space/time is going to be potentially hugely profitable. It's a GOOD idea. We're really down to TSMC/Samsung in the public foundry space (GF/Micron/etc are all pretty specialized or way behind). Intel being a third with that much demand? They'll bloody print money, if they can build a truly modern fab and process.Yeah they are saying they have their 10 and 7nm issues worked out and that the new fabs will be their 7nm which based on the fact that TSMC was able to pick up Intel's slack on the DoE supercomputer means that the Intel 7nm is roughly equivalent to the TSMC 5nm. Intel's previous foundry attempts were doomed because Intel would not rent out time on their current processes only ones that were a gen or two behind and nobody really wanted that at any volume, not when there were viable alternatives elsewhere that were cheaper as they weren't carrying the big Intel brand name behind them.
Also all the people acting like Intel will never be able to compete are forgetting that not long ago Intel was two nodes ahead of everyone else. They were way out in front for quite some time. So it is reasonable to think that they could get things together and become competitive again. Likewise one of the other foundries could trip up as Intel did.As the current silicon shortage has shown us: we are going to need more foundries period. Which is also why TSMC is also expanding.
There are few companies in the world that can compete as a top end foundry - as obviously the cost of entry is so incredibly high with massive R&D expenses and facilities as well as just having the employee talent. And although it's obvious that Intel hasn't been there as they've struggled with 14nm for so long (as has been noted ad nauseum in this thread) Intel has the shortest road to being a tier 1 supplier again versus any of the others. I am definitely not holding my breath for Global Foundries to get in the game. You think Texas Instruments is up for it? How about ON Semiconductor? No? Yeah, didn't think so. Samsung is the current only other major provider of higher end chips - and frankly they need to expand too if they're going to increase supplying other vendors.
If Intel can actually get its foundry junk together, even if late, it would be welcomed by basically all silicon designers in general - especially if they open that foundry space to others, which seems to be their intention.
Depending on the distance either condolences or congratulations depending on weather it’s too close and tanks the property value or just right and doubles it.I am pretty sure one of these facilities is going up pretty close to my house.
Don't worry, I'm sure they're expecting a big fat stinky check from Joe Biden. They'll just triple the taxation to the poor to make up for it.Well, maybe someone should tell them that it's gonna take a HELL of a lot MOAR money than that if they ever hope to catch up to, let alone compete with, TSMC.... but at present, $20B is a proverbial "drop in the bucket" for them though..
x86 has nothing to do with it. AMD is proof that x86 still has lots of life when there's a profit motive. Intel was so dominant for such a long time that they became complacent and let others catch up and surpass them. Not having competition means that the most profitable thing to do is not spend R&D, which is what Intel did. Intel now has no choice but to spend money and yes, $20B is not enough. Joe Biden better not help pay for this sorta thing.And yes, I would say they could very well be preparing for the eventual demise of X86, as they know that the fruity boys (and nGreediya) are on to something now with their new ARM plans, and they would absolutely hate to see that as a singular reason why they die and or fade into the annals of history, which WILL happen if they don't get their collective shiitzu together and finally move beyond their pathetic 14nm++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ clusterfudgecrapola
Competing companies can commonly work together if it's a win for both parties. For example, AMD owns the x86-64 spec and licenses it to Intel. But Intel owns x86 so they reached a cross-licensing agreement.My question is how many companies want to pay intel for the foundry business? How many companies want to pay THE competitor money to make your chip? Its also going to take them at least 2 years to get this one running. TSMC will never compete with their customers but Intel sure does.
A fair number, there are a lot of markets that need chips produced not all of them are CPU's and GPU's the recent automotive stuff is a prime example of this need. The US is also very likely to start shoring up their own chip manufacturing tech, having almost all the worlds supply of high-end silicon coming out of Taiwan is proving to be problematic and in the next 5-10 years expected to become a lot more complicated for reasons that don't need to be mentioned in this particular forum. It is very much in the US's best interest to get some of that high end manufacturing localized, and they are certainly in the right to subsidize it going forward as a lack of access to those plants have shown it can cripple very large portions of the economy, and open up a pretty big security hole in the event of some global hostilities.My question is how many companies want to pay intel for the foundry business? How many companies want to pay THE competitor money to make your chip? Its also going to take them at least 2 years to get this one running. TSMC will never compete with their customers but Intel sure does.
But those past attempts were pretty half assed, keeping those fabs 2 generations behind while charging a premium for the Intel name was a bad call. They won’t have those options this time around.Intel has tried to fab external customers IC but has never truly been successful.
Charlie D from SemiAccurate has cataloged Intels dabbles Fabinho other companies IC.
But they will probably still be 2 generations behind TSMC. Also intel doesn’t only do CPUs and GPUs. But I bet you the big names won’t be going to intel anytime soon.But those past attempts were pretty half assed, keeping those fabs 2 generations behind while charging a premium for the Intel name was a bad call. They won’t have those options this time around.
Well behind TSMC perhaps but it will be Intel’s 7nm. Which seems to trade blows with TSMC 5nm. But in the old case when Intel was on 90nm they were going not fabbing 180 for the 3’rd parties, stuff like that.But they will probably still be 2 generations behind TSMC. Also intel doesn’t only do CPUs and GPUs. But I bet you the big names won’t be going to intel anytime soon.
AMD is worth a lot more than 20 billion, if nvidia wanted to buy arm for 40 billion then AMD is probably around 100 billion. didn't they buy xilinx for 20 billion?Intel wants AMD money when they just spent 2-3x what AMD is worth
Socialism hand-in-hand with corporatism... haha, I know, I know.Don't worry, I'm sure they're expecting a big fat stinky check from Joe Biden. They'll just triple the taxation to the poor to make up for it.
You know, I thought x86/x86-64 would be dead by 2030 at the latest, but AMD has proven that ideology wrong, and have definitely shown that there is still a lot of life left in that ISA - agreed!x86 has nothing to do with it. AMD is proof that x86 still has lots of life when there's a profit motive. Intel was so dominant for such a long time that they became complacent and let others catch up and surpass them. Not having competition means that the most profitable thing to do is not spend R&D, which is what Intel did. Intel now has no choice but to spend money and yes, $20B is not enough. Joe Biden better not help pay for this sorta thing.
Currently valued at just shy of $95BAMD is worth a lot more than 20 billion, if nvidia wanted to buy arm for 40 billion then AMD is probably around 100 billion. didn't they buy xilinx for 20 billion?
Market Cap of AMD is $92B, add in just acquired and yet to be finalized Xlinx of $29B and we have $121B. Typically, buying a company out offers a premium to shareholders in excess of market cap, so we are talking more than that.Currently valued at just shy of $95B
AMD is worth a lot more than 20 billion, if nvidia wanted to buy arm for 40 billion then AMD is probably around 100 billion. didn't they buy xilinx for 20 billion?