NattyKathy
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2019
- Messages
- 1,480
wheee, 3-8% faster and twice the power consumption as we enter year six of 10nm being delayed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
wheee, 3-8% faster and twice the power consumption as we enter year six of 10nm being delayed
"Intel's Rocket Lake S CPUs are up to 19 percent faster than last year" -- https://www.engadget.com/intel-rocket-lake-s-desktop-cpu-cores-213046856.htmlwheee, 3-8% faster and twice the power consumption as we enter year six of 10nm being delayed
how'd they find it?Funny how Amd comes around and owns Intels ass and all the sudden intel is finding 20 percent uplift on one release. Where as before it was a 5 percent or so year after year.
Swan probably threatend to offshore their jobs to TSMChow'd they find it?
TBF, they did have to chop cores off.Funny how Amd comes around and owns Intels ass and all the sudden intel is finding 20 percent uplift on one release. Where as before it was a 5 percent or so year after year.
Hey, +2 to +9 percent is "up to 19%", but we all knew that going in.Looks like the real world promises of 'up to 19% ipc gains' fall flat. The direct quote from Intel Via Anandtech on gaming is as follows, remember this is direct from INTEL:
"For performance, Intel is claiming a +2% to +9% gain in average frame rates in a variety of modern games (Gears of War 5, Cyberpunk 2077, Watchdogs Legion, Farcry New Dawn) at 1080p in either High or Ultra settings." -Anandtech
full article here: https://www.anandtech.com/show/1639...-rocket-lake-core-i911900k-and-z590-coming-q1
If Intels own forecast holds true, this is a huge letdown from expectations.
erek shouldnt beleive everything you read, wait until actual reviews are out. Considering how much power Intel CPU's are sucking up to try and stay relevant...."Intel's Rocket Lake S CPUs are up to 19 percent faster than last year" -- https://www.engadget.com/intel-rocket-lake-s-desktop-cpu-cores-213046856.html
erek shouldnt beleive everything you read, wait until actual reviews are out. Considering how much power Intel CPU's are sucking up to try and stay relevant....
Well, it is a new architecture, so this isn't just their slight product refresh. So I am hoping that this is essentially V1 for whatever they are coming up with for their future mass-produced 10nm stuff.Funny how Amd comes around and owns Intels ass and all the sudden intel is finding 20 percent uplift on one release. Where as before it was a 5 percent or so year after year.
Pretty sure they only used that one 'popular benchmark game' that they already beat AMD in currently for some of their amazing numbers xDerek again, slides,provided by Intel, of course they will make their product look good, not actual real life benchmarks run by an actual reputable websites. Wait until they are in the hands of real people to test them.
Intels "up to 19 percent" comes out of thin air and their own gaming benchmarks are 2-8 percent so this 19 looks to be marketing hype or a hidden one off benchmark at best. Certainly not backed up by any "published" benchmarks in the intel press releases so far.Well, it is a new architecture, so this isn't just their slight product refresh. So I am hoping that this is essentially V1 for whatever they are coming up with for their future mass-produced 10nm stuff.
Power suck is merely a number if performance is there! Taco knew intel will prevail! Benchmarks dont lie.
I'm assuming overclocked also but that will blow straight past PL2.Wait...so that 5.3ghz is only for a single core?
On top of that, I9 is still gutted to 8 cores now with an all core boost of only 4.8ghz. We shall see if they can be overclocked any. I'd hope for at least 5 ghz all core.
Well, most people don't need an $800+ CPU they can't even buy.the 5950x is a power builder/enthusiast HEDT part worth every penny of threadripping light crunching power that beast delivers. the 11900k's only hope is limited availablity on the 5800/5900.
Well, most people don't need an $800+ CPU they can't even buy.
And that's to say nothing of the OC headaches with Ryzen. I just went through this recently with a 5900X, the amount of minutiae involved to get it dialed in without hamfisted PBO overvolting the thing was hours upon hours of time, versus three buttonclicks in a Z490 Bios for an easy 5.2Ghz allcore on a 10700k, and flawless 4400Mhz memory with zero config required.
Zen3 is a beast to be sure, and essential for the market, but 5800X is priced too high, and you can't buy 5900/5950, so I'd say Intel isn't looking bad - and not just for availability reasons.
Zen3's only only a bit faster than "outdated" Skylake, and AMD’s official number for 5950x is “5%” faster, owing much of that to PCIE 4.0. Rocket Lake with new arch and PCIE 4.0 will make short work of it. Leaks showing 10-11% IPC boost, Intel claiming "double-digits" officially.
While the FOMO herd is fighting over Zen3 and you can't find a CPU in stock, Rocket Lake could be a great or even superior alternative - especially for gaming focused builds, and if they can get them out in sufficient numbers.
Made me look it up. So this is Cypress Cove produced on 14nm. I had always assumed it was yet another Skylake refresh. I guess that explains the gains they were able to make. Makes me excited to see what Alder Lake brings.Well, it is a new architecture, so this isn't just their slight product refresh. So I am hoping that this is essentially V1 for whatever they are coming up with for their future mass-produced 10nm stuff.