I heard the same rhetoric when XP came out; "Windows 2000 is faster, cleaner, sleeker. Why do I need a green start button and a different control panel? XP contains the same security features and codebase, why upgrade?"
Well, now it's as if all those technology trolls are now running XP and hating on Vista. Will it take Windows 7 to get them to crawl to Vista, only to hate Windows 7?
We can go on and on about the advantages of XP over Vista, the features of Vista and why it is/isn't worth upgrading, but seriously, it's like people are just jumping on the hate bandwagon.
So far, the largest complaint is that Vista is too hardware demanding. Well, the Operating System is linking dlls to support every application you may want to run, all the way back to Windows 95. Nevermind the fact that almost any legacy application will run, let's focus on how slow it is.
Oh, and OS X is so zippy--despite the fact that they cut support for OS 9 and earlier apps running natively--I wonder where all that speed comes from.
Sigh.
Anyone else sick to death of this? I work in IT, and this is all I hear, day in and day out.
Well, now it's as if all those technology trolls are now running XP and hating on Vista. Will it take Windows 7 to get them to crawl to Vista, only to hate Windows 7?
We can go on and on about the advantages of XP over Vista, the features of Vista and why it is/isn't worth upgrading, but seriously, it's like people are just jumping on the hate bandwagon.
So far, the largest complaint is that Vista is too hardware demanding. Well, the Operating System is linking dlls to support every application you may want to run, all the way back to Windows 95. Nevermind the fact that almost any legacy application will run, let's focus on how slow it is.
Oh, and OS X is so zippy--despite the fact that they cut support for OS 9 and earlier apps running natively--I wonder where all that speed comes from.
Sigh.
Anyone else sick to death of this? I work in IT, and this is all I hear, day in and day out.