• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

How do you test for Spectre/Meltdown vulnerability? In what CPU will it be fixed at hardware level?

oblongpolygon

Weaksauce
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
119
Two questions:
  1. How do you test or check for Spectre / Meltdown vulnerability?
  2. Do we know, yet, in what CPU these will be fixed at hardware level? So will 9th generation Intel CPU's be "immune" for example?
I ask the second question because it seems like new "variants" of the above vulnerabilities are being (or have been) discovered, so... and with each new patch, I understand we can expect further slowdown.

So, the cumulative slowdown of patching all the variants could be in the 15% to 30% range.. or so I'm reading / heading.

If the slowdown is going to be that high, I'm just going to upgrade the CPU when a CPU, which isn't vulnerable, becomes available.

(Of course, I understand that vulnerabilities for that later CPU could soon be discovered, and then we start all over again.)

(I have an 8th generation Intel CPU currently.)
 
Last edited:
Theres not going to be a cpu that has a hardware fix that doesnt get a perfomance hit for years , problem is they build 3 generations ahead to keep up with the curve. Why do you really think every CPU cycle we only get 10 to 15 percent improvements a year. The intel CPU as we know it has to be built from the ground up becuase this was a main internal part of there CPU and most for the part.
 
This was the main reason I decided to do an AMD build to replace my aging Intel box. I wanted to keep at least one of each but ...

While people are saying current AMD is still not as fast as current Intel - they are also forgetting that AMD (by quirk of design) is not as vulnerable on a hardware level as Intel is and won't require as much patching AFAIK. And since Intel is not going to be redesigning their entire architecture any time soon - that weakness is likely to persist for a few more generations at least.

If and when Intel comes back to parity on cores, "patched" performance and price - I'll give them another go but at the moment, it looks like it's going to be awhile.
 
Back
Top