![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
Hitachi 2TB Harddrive Owner's Thread
- Thread starter odditory
- Start date
^ Impressive until they change it midway through the warranty like they seem to have done with some other models. Very hard to put any faith in Seagate and unfortunately they're going to become one of the go-to drives due to current prices and based on Hitachi's supply appearing to dry up. Just baffling that as time's gone on and tech has matured and increased, warranties have decreased. One can only assume corners are being cut somewhere to meet price goals and that means reliability takes a hit enough that the company has less faith in their own products after extensive internal testing.
More time needs to pass before anyone currently standardized on Hitachi drives should consider another brand, unless you simply have to have the storage now. Reason being its still unknown how a transition if any will be carried out by WD, what the scope of it is, etc. No public statements have been made, or likely will be made, all we can do is watch the supply chain and see what comes down. It wouldn't make sense for WD to simply kill off Hitachi's fabs and send everyone home so the question is will the new drives they produce be WD's design/internals/controller/firmware (bleh) or will it be Hitachi drives all the way down to the firmware but with a WD label. In WD's arrogance I'm sure they feel their crap is superior though and thus "everything must use it."
More time needs to pass before anyone currently standardized on Hitachi drives should consider another brand, unless you simply have to have the storage now. Reason being its still unknown how a transition if any will be carried out by WD, what the scope of it is, etc. No public statements have been made, or likely will be made, all we can do is watch the supply chain and see what comes down. It wouldn't make sense for WD to simply kill off Hitachi's fabs and send everyone home so the question is will the new drives they produce be WD's design/internals/controller/firmware (bleh) or will it be Hitachi drives all the way down to the firmware but with a WD label. In WD's arrogance I'm sure they feel their crap is superior though and thus "everything must use it."
Last edited:
larrymoencurly
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2002
- Messages
- 1,635
I've never seen that done by a company that didn't go bankrupt, except for Samsung 750GB Spinpoint F1 drives sold by Fry's with a 5-year factory warranty that was shrunk to 3 years.
This is pretty much where I'm at. My 6 TB array is now full. When I built the ZFS server it was on 1TB WD RE4 drives. They've been great. They were cheap and before the flood. The problem is i need more storage now and 1TB ain't going to cut it and the 250+ per drive they are charging per 2TB is just too much.
Unfortunately I didn't by the 5k3000 Hitachis in time. So I'm looking for alternatives. I'm not afraid of advanced format I can config for that no problem. I just need the best bang for buck. Would you or anyone recommend the 7K3000's for a ZFS build? I've reviewed so many I can't make up my mind anymore..lol.
Hitachi 7K3000 2TB drives are on sale at Fry's until Thursday, Aug. 9. These are model HDS723020BLA642, part number 0F012155. They are in a retail box with Hitachi part number 0S02861. Fry's is showing them as 32MB buffer, but the boxes on the shelf show 64BM buffer. The Fry's item number is #5947254. I picked up four and they are working fine. Two had FW 800 manufactured in ARP 2012 and two had FW 5C0 manufactured in OCT 2011. I updated these last two to FW 800.
http://www.frys.com/product/5947254
http://www.frys.com/product/5947254
nekrosoft13
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2005
- Messages
- 1,581
its sad, now with hitachi almost gone and samsung gone, there are no good hard drive manufactures left 
only seagate and WD.
only seagate and WD.its sad, now with hitachi almost gone and samsung gone, there are no good hard drive manufactures left
Just wait for Toshiba to enter the consumer market
nekrosoft13
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2005
- Messages
- 1,581
why is hitachi making drives for toshiba?
FWIW, two weeks ago I sent in a Hitachi 2TB 7K2000 HDS7220ALA330 in for RMA, today received a Hitachi 2TB 7K3000 HDS723020BLA642 as a replacement.
The drive I sent in wasn't even really bad, only had a few bad sectors, I more just sent it in as a test to see what they'd send back in return since at least one person reported getting a WD Green back on a 2TB Hitachi RMA (kill me).
The drive I sent in wasn't even really bad, only had a few bad sectors, I more just sent it in as a test to see what they'd send back in return since at least one person reported getting a WD Green back on a 2TB Hitachi RMA (kill me).
Last edited:
sovereignty68
n00b
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2009
- Messages
- 10
wow really?
Interesting to note the Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB drive has been quietly available at online retailers for the past 5-6 weeks. And despite the Toshiba sticker apparently they even still show as a Hitachi HDS721010DLE6​30 (Hitachi 7K1000.D) when queried by the controller. However I'm sure this new batch of 1.5TB/2.0TB/3.0TB announced in the press release will ATA-identify as Toshiba.
Given the Toshiba press release yesterday, the significance here - and good news for existing Hitachi owners looking to expand their drive pools - is its more confirmation that these are literally just restickered Hitachi's rather than some new ground-up design based on Hitachi designs/patents.
Given the Toshiba press release yesterday, the significance here - and good news for existing Hitachi owners looking to expand their drive pools - is its more confirmation that these are literally just restickered Hitachi's rather than some new ground-up design based on Hitachi designs/patents.
Last edited:
I hope you're right! But, then, there must be an error in the details/specs in the tables in that press-release. Among the non-7200rpm models, they show the 3TB ones as being 5940rpm, with 2TB and 1.5TB being 5700rpm; however, in the DS5K3000 product line, it (the reality) is the reverse.
Further justification for "Don't make technical decisions based on marketing statements." ???
That's trivial and probably erroneous. The key things to remember are #1 they were basically handed a winning formula by adopting a Hitachi plant - why change it. #2 There wasn't enough lead time to design a new drive from the ground up this quickly.
Does anyone know what the defaults are for spin up/down times? is there anything in the disk firmware telling it to sleep?
I have a couple of these in my freebsd box (disks set to always on) but the disk still seems to spin up/down and the load cycle count jumping up high (happens when nothing is using the disks well I cant tell whats using them (and why always on isnt always on)) - Other than the load cycle you can hear the head seeking or a little beep when it gets accessed for the first time (head parking)?
I have a couple of these in my freebsd box (disks set to always on) but the disk still seems to spin up/down and the load cycle count jumping up high (happens when nothing is using the disks well I cant tell whats using them (and why always on isnt always on)) - Other than the load cycle you can hear the head seeking or a little beep when it gets accessed for the first time (head parking)?
Last edited:
wkearney99
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2010
- Messages
- 370
Well, given all the drive vendor shuffling lately I wouldn't be surprised to hear someone thinking that.
WD buys HGST but then sells some 3.5 drive lines to Toshiba. Meanwhile WD also buys a Thailand part of Toshiba's drive manufacturing. Just whose name will be on the Deskstar/Ultrastar drives once the WD->Toshiba transition is complete?
Who's on First and all that... Bit shocking how condensed the drive market has become in recent years. Not that I miss the adventures of crappy Micropolis and Maxtor drives... but at least there was diversity in the market.
WD buys HGST but then sells some 3.5 drive lines to Toshiba. Meanwhile WD also buys a Thailand part of Toshiba's drive manufacturing. Just whose name will be on the Deskstar/Ultrastar drives once the WD->Toshiba transition is complete?
Who's on First and all that... Bit shocking how condensed the drive market has become in recent years. Not that I miss the adventures of crappy Micropolis and Maxtor drives... but at least there was diversity in the market.
Question for RocketRaid 4320 owners: Have any of you tried using a 2TB 7k3000? Is it compatible?
As some of you may know, Hitachi is shipping 7k3000s in their 7k2000 boxes now, but I already have an array of 7k2000s on my RR4320 that I want to add on to. Can I add these 7k3000s to my existing array of 7k2000s? I've heard from the 3TB 7k3000s are not compatible with the RR4320 but wasn't sure about the 2TB 7k3000s.
It would be nice to get a confirmation from someone in the community before attempting an online expansion and holding my breath..
Thanks!
As some of you may know, Hitachi is shipping 7k3000s in their 7k2000 boxes now, but I already have an array of 7k2000s on my RR4320 that I want to add on to. Can I add these 7k3000s to my existing array of 7k2000s? I've heard from the 3TB 7k3000s are not compatible with the RR4320 but wasn't sure about the 2TB 7k3000s.
It would be nice to get a confirmation from someone in the community before attempting an online expansion and holding my breath..
Thanks!
nitrobass24
[H]ard|DCer of the Month - December 2009
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2006
- Messages
- 10,465
Anyone started upgrading to the 4TB hard drives?
I was thinking of snagging some Hitachi 4TB 5ks before they all disappeared from the market and cut my drive count in half.
Running an Areca 1880
I was thinking of snagging some Hitachi 4TB 5ks before they all disappeared from the market and cut my drive count in half.
Running an Areca 1880
We have production arrays with both 5k and 7k Hitachi 4TB drives, they are good reliable drives for HW RAID.
I have been having fits with one of my 2TB 5K3000's. All drives are connected to 2xM1015 IT mode in OI. Below shows errors on the drive, but I'm not exactly sure what is wrong with the drive. I have taken the drive out and ran DFT and HD Tune on it and it is not reporting errors. So I am not sure what the steps are for true problem determination are.
The drive originally had 580 firmware. I upgraded to 5C0 but that didn't help. Questions and suggestions are welcome.
The drive originally had 580 firmware. I upgraded to 5C0 but that didn't help. Questions and suggestions are welcome.
Code:
Disks in use on LSI SAS2 controller (click on Controller:Enclosure:Slot to identify)
id sas2_slot product cap error smart_sn smart_health smart_temp pool vdev state busy
c2t5000CCA369CAB2A4d0 c0:e1:s0 Hitachi HDS5C302 2.00 TB Error: S:14 H:0 T:0 PASSED 43 °C zfs_p1 raidz ONLINE configured
c2t5000CCA369CD3F3Ad0 c0:e1:s1 Hitachi HDS5C302 2.00 TB Error: S:13 H:0 T:0 ML0220XXXXXXX PASSED 46 °C zfs_p1 raidz ONLINE configured
c2t5000CCA369CD615Fd0 c0:e1:s2 Hitachi HDS5C302 2.00 TB Error: S:2 H:80 T:391 ML0220XXXXXXX PASSED 42 °C zfs_p1 spares AVAIL configured
c2t5000CCA369CD6427d0 c0:e1:s7 Hitachi HDS5C302 2.00 TB Error: S:13 H:0 T:0 ML0220XXXXXXX PASSED 41 °C zfs_p1 raidz ONLINE configured
c2t5000CCA369CF89D1d0 c0:e1:s5 Hitachi HDS5C302 2.00 TB Error: S:13 H:0 T:0 ML0220XXXXXXX PASSED 42 °C zfs_p1 raidz ONLINE configured
c2t5000CCA369CF9DD7d0 c0:e1:s6 Hitachi HDS5C302 2.00 TB Error: S:13 H:0 T:0 ML0220XXXXXXX PASSED 42 °C zfs_p1 raidz ONLINE configured
c2t5000CCA36AC2A785d0 c1:e1:s4 Hitachi HDS72302 2.00 TB Error: S:13 H:0 T:0 MN3220xxxxxxx PASSED 43 °C zfs_p1 raidz ONLINE configured
c2t5000CCA36AC2ADB2d0 c1:e1:s5 Hitachi HDS72302 2.00 TB Error: S:13 H:0 T:0 MN3220xxxxxxx PASSED 45 °C zfs_p1 raidz ONLINE configured
c2t5000CCA36AC2ADB6d0 c1:e1:s1 Hitachi HDS72302 2.00 TB Error: S:13 H:0 T:0 MN3220xxxxxxx PASSED 44 °C zfs_p1 raidz ONLINE configured
c2t5000CCA36AC2BCCAd0 c1:e1:s7 Hitachi HDS72302 2.00 TB Error: S:13 H:0 T:0 MN3220xxxxxxx PASSED 46 °C zfs_p1 raidz ONLINE configured
c2t5000CCA36AC2BCCDd0 c1:e1:s3 Hitachi HDS72302 2.00 TB Error: S:13 H:0 T:0 MN3220xxxxxxx PASSED 45 °C zfs_p1 raidz ONLINE configured
c2t5000CCA36AC2BCDAd0 c1:e1:s6 Hitachi HDS72302 2.00 TB Error: S:13 H:0 T:0 MN3220xxxxxxx PASSED 48 °C zfs_p1 raidz ONLINE configured
c2t5000CCA36AC2D771d0 c1:e1:s2 Hitachi HDS72302 2.00 TB Error: S:13 H:0 T:0 MN3220xxxxxxx PASSED 46 °C zfs_p1 raidz ONLINE configured
Disks available on LSI SAS2 controller (Controller:Enclosure:Slot)
id sas2_slot product cap error smart_sn smart_health smart_temp pool vdev state busy
Disks in use on non LSI2 controller:
id identify product cap error smart_sn smart_health smart_temp pool vdev state busy
c4t0d0 via dd Virtual disk 21.47 GB Error: S:0 H:0 T:0 6000c29e99569a6877c43add1e35e494 n.a. - rpool basic ONLINE configured
Disks available on non LSI2 controller:
id identify product cap error smart_sn smart_health smart_temp pool vdev state busy
SAS2 Controller
Index Adapter Vendor ID Device ID PCI Adr Sub Ven Sub Dev
0 SAS2008 1000h 72h 00h:03h:00h:00h 1000h 3040h
1 SAS2008 1000h 72h 00h:13h:00h:00h 1000h 3020h
Enclosure Information
Enclosure Logical ID Numslots Startslot
1 500605b0 8 0
Smart details of disk c2t5000CCA369CD615Fd0 Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632
smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [i386-pc-solaris2.11] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family: Hitachi Deskstar 5K3000
Device Model: Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632
Serial Number: ML0220XXXXX
LU WWN Device Id: 5 000cca 369cd615f
Firmware Version: ML6OA5C0
User Capacity: 2,000,398,934,016 bytes [2.00 TB]
Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical
Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
ATA Version is: 8
ATA Standard is: ATA-8-ACS revision 4
Local Time is: Wed Nov 28 11:33:38 2012 CST
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
General SMART Values:
Offline data collection status: (0x80) Offline data collection activity
was never started.
Auto Offline Data Collection: Enabled.
Self-test execution status: ( 0) The previous self-test routine completed
without error or no self-test has ever
been run.
Total time to complete Offline
data collection: (23645) seconds.
Offline data collection
capabilities: (0x5b) SMART execute Offline immediate.
Auto Offline data collection on/off support.
Suspend Offline collection upon new
command.
Offline surface scan supported.
Self-test supported.
No Conveyance Self-test supported.
Selective Self-test supported.
SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering
power-saving mode.
Supports SMART auto save timer.
Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported.
General Purpose Logging supported.
Short self-test routine
recommended polling time: ( 1) minutes.
Extended self-test routine
recommended polling time: ( 255) minutes.
SCT capabilities: (0x003d) SCT Status supported.
SCT Error Recovery Control supported.
SCT Feature Control supported.
SCT Data Table supported.
SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000b 100 100 016 Pre-fail Always - 0
2 Throughput_Performance 0x0005 100 100 054 Pre-fail Offline - 0
3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0007 100 100 024 Pre-fail Always - 329
4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 49
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 005 Pre-fail Always - 0
7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000b 100 100 067 Pre-fail Always - 0
8 Seek_Time_Performance 0x0005 100 100 020 Pre-fail Offline - 0
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0012 099 099 000 Old_age Always - 9830
10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 100 060 Pre-fail Always - 0
12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 49
192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 50
193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 50
194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0002 142 142 000 Old_age Always - 42 (Min/Max 25/48)
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0022 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0008 100 100 000 Old_age Offline - 0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x000a 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0
SMART Error Log Version: 1
ATA Error Count: 2
CR = Command Register [HEX]
FR = Features Register [HEX]
SC = Sector Count Register [HEX]
SN = Sector Number Register [HEX]
CL = Cylinder Low Register [HEX]
CH = Cylinder High Register [HEX]
DH = Device/Head Register [HEX]
DC = Device Command Register [HEX]
ER = Error register [HEX]
ST = Status register [HEX]
Powered_Up_Time is measured from power on, and printed as
DDd+hh:mm:SS.sss where DD=days, hh=hours, mm=minutes,
SS=sec, and sss=millisec. It "wraps" after 49.710 days.
Error 2 occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 9829 hours (409 days + 13 hours)
When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or idle.
After command completion occurred, registers were:
ER ST SC SN CL CH DH
-- -- -- -- -- -- --
10 51 b0 f4 38 8f 07 Error: IDNF at LBA = 0x078f38f4 = 126826740
Commands leading to the command that caused the error were:
CR FR SC SN CL CH DH DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---------------- --------------------
61 00 08 a7 5f 8f 40 00 00:10:48.789 WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
61 00 00 a7 5e 8f 40 00 00:10:48.789 WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
61 c0 08 a7 5d 8f 40 00 00:10:48.788 WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
61 40 00 67 5e 8f 40 00 00:10:48.788 WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
61 40 18 67 5d 8f 40 00 00:10:48.787 WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
Error 1 occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 9822 hours (409 days + 6 hours)
When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or idle.
After command completion occurred, registers were:
ER ST SC SN CL CH DH
-- -- -- -- -- -- --
10 51 23 7c 3d a4 02 Error: IDNF at LBA = 0x02a43d7c = 44318076
Commands leading to the command that caused the error were:
CR FR SC SN CL CH DH DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---------------- --------------------
61 03 00 c6 4e 0f 40 00 02:15:20.098 WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
61 00 08 5f 72 a4 40 00 02:15:20.098 WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
61 03 00 48 96 5c 40 00 02:15:20.098 WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
61 40 10 1f 72 a4 40 00 02:15:20.097 WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
61 40 08 df 71 a4 40 00 02:15:20.097 WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
No self-tests have been logged. [To run self-tests, use: smartctl -t]
SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 1
SPAN MIN_LBA MAX_LBA CURRENT_TEST_STATUS
1 0 0 Not_testing
2 0 0 Not_testing
3 0 0 Not_testing
4 0 0 Not_testing
5 0 0 Not_testing
Selective self-test flags (0x0):
After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk.
If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay.
zpool status:
Pool
pool: rpool
state: ONLINE
status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The pool can
still be used, but some features are unavailable.
action: Upgrade the pool using 'zpool upgrade'. Once this is done, the
pool will no longer be accessible on older software versions.
scan: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM SLOT CAP MODELL
rpool ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 21.47 GB Virtual disk
errors: No known data errors
pool: zfs_p1
state: ONLINE
status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The pool can
still be used, but some features are unavailable.
action: Upgrade the pool using 'zpool upgrade'. Once this is done, the
pool will no longer be accessible on older software versions.
scan: resilvered 3.22G in 9h28m with 0 errors on Wed Nov 28 07:24:20 2012
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM SLOT CAP MODELL
zfs_p1 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c2t5000CCA369CAB2A4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0:e1:s0 2.00 TB Hitachi HDS5C302
c2t5000CCA369CD3F3Ad0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0:e1:s1 2.00 TB Hitachi HDS5C302
c2t5000CCA36AC2ADB6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1:e1:s1 2.00 TB Hitachi HDS72302
c2t5000CCA369CD6427d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0:e1:s7 2.00 TB Hitachi HDS5C302
c2t5000CCA369CF89D1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0:e1:s5 2.00 TB Hitachi HDS5C302
c2t5000CCA369CF9DD7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0:e1:s6 2.00 TB Hitachi HDS5C302
raidz2-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c2t5000CCA36AC2A785d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1:e1:s4 2.00 TB Hitachi HDS72302
c2t5000CCA36AC2ADB2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1:e1:s5 2.00 TB Hitachi HDS72302
c2t5000CCA36AC2BCCAd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1:e1:s7 2.00 TB Hitachi HDS72302
c2t5000CCA36AC2BCCDd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1:e1:s3 2.00 TB Hitachi HDS72302
c2t5000CCA36AC2BCDAd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1:e1:s6 2.00 TB Hitachi HDS72302
c2t5000CCA36AC2D771d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1:e1:s2 2.00 TB Hitachi HDS72302
spares
c2t5000CCA369CD615Fd0 AVAIL c0:e1:s2 2.00 TB Hitachi HDS5C302
errors: No known data errorsnitrobass24
[H]ard|DCer of the Month - December 2009
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2006
- Messages
- 10,465
Anyone know how to check warranty on these?
I went to the hgst support site, and plugged in my serials, but it returns an invalid serial. I also noticed that on the Help me find my Serial # page that none of the 5K3000 models are listed.
Any ideas?
I went to the hgst support site, and plugged in my serials, but it returns an invalid serial. I also noticed that on the Help me find my Serial # page that none of the 5K3000 models are listed.
Any ideas?
You haven't posted the exact message returned by the warranty check tool, so at this point any response is purely based on assumption.
If the warranty check tool returns no information or returns "invalid serial" it's likely that you entered your serial incorrectly. (it's easy to confuse a zero for an "o", etc). Typically if a warranty is not valid for return through Hitachi RMA you will receive a message along the lines of "return product to manufacturer" (you might see this message with used drives sold by amazon, or drives included in system builds)
It's also possible that you entered incorrect information for the captcha.
http://www.hgst.com/portal/site/en/support/warranty/#step_two
nitrobass24
[H]ard|DCer of the Month - December 2009
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2006
- Messages
- 10,465
Before you call people out maybe you should read the post. I clearly stated it returns "invalid serial".
For my 7K3000/7K2000 drives: I've only gotten that error when making a typo in entering the serial number on the Hitachi website. (Picking the wrong country gives me a "The drive is not valid for warranty through HGST." error. Getting the CAPTCHA wrong also provides a very clear "The security code entered is incorrect" error.)
Good luck getting any help with that type of attitude, I could have done a lot more to help, but I'm definitely not going to now. lol
unholythree
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2011
- Messages
- 234
Interesting, I would be tempted if the price falls a little bit. I've been thinking about building a Toshiba DT01ACA300 ZFS array but I would rather go with Hitachi if there was a reasonably priced offering in production.
I'd rather have Hitachi disk to, and would pay a bit more for them.
I've got quite a few of them and their very compatible with the Adaptec
and Lsi cards I have.
I like the Toshiba's to, currently have 6 in raid 10.
This is great news as I thought desktop Hitachi drives were done.
I've got quite a few of them and their very compatible with the Adaptec
and Lsi cards I have.
I like the Toshiba's to, currently have 6 in raid 10.
This is great news as I thought desktop Hitachi drives were done.
From an old EMC SAN i have a bunch of Hitachi 2TB disks with the following specs:
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 (Ultrastar A7K2000)
Type DK7SAA200
P/N 0F10312
MLC JPK34E
EMC PN 118032706
REV A02
I placed 4 of these in a PC with an Asus P5E mainboard. (Intel Raid)
Al seemed wel until i ran Featuretool 2.15 (DOS) and change some cache and powermanagment settings. (SATA IDE mode at that time)
Now when a disk is powered (even without sata data cable) it's making a ratteling noise with a constant interval.
Anyone know what this could be? , does the Featuretool maybe change the wrong things in these types of drives.
It is a bit as described here : http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Problem_with_hard_drive_clicking
I tried firmware updates (JKDL_SP.EXE tool, and firmware files for 3EA and 3MA)
but when i run it (from dos bootable media) i get "Device not found"
Are these disk now ruined ? It gets very hot after even a short while when its rattling on it's own.
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 (Ultrastar A7K2000)
Type DK7SAA200
P/N 0F10312
MLC JPK34E
EMC PN 118032706
REV A02
I placed 4 of these in a PC with an Asus P5E mainboard. (Intel Raid)
Al seemed wel until i ran Featuretool 2.15 (DOS) and change some cache and powermanagment settings. (SATA IDE mode at that time)
Now when a disk is powered (even without sata data cable) it's making a ratteling noise with a constant interval.
Anyone know what this could be? , does the Featuretool maybe change the wrong things in these types of drives.
It is a bit as described here : http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Problem_with_hard_drive_clicking
I tried firmware updates (JKDL_SP.EXE tool, and firmware files for 3EA and 3MA)
but when i run it (from dos bootable media) i get "Device not found"
Are these disk now ruined ? It gets very hot after even a short while when its rattling on it's own.
Last edited: