am i the only one who thinks the graphics suck compared to halo 3.
. While good games, 2, 3 and ODST never quite had the feel that the first game did. All that has changed with Reach, and wow, is it ever amazing to have that feel back.
first sentence sounds like you haven't played it yet
second sentence makes it sound like you then instantly played the entire game
which is it?
already finished the game. Second sentence i meant to say it felt like bungie rushed the game in development. doesn't feel polished compare to the other halo games.
theres no way rach has the feel of the story from halo 1.
reach was huge disappointment and feel like a rushed game.
While good games, 2, 3 and ODST never quite had the feel that the first game did. All that has changed with Reach, and wow, is it ever amazing to have that feel back. My hats off to Bungie, they've done it. Couldn't of given Halo a better send off.
Interesting. Never cared for Halo 2/3, but I did like 1. Will have to borrow/check out Reach.I'm not a big Halo fan, I'm definitely not a fan of playing FPS on consoles, and I probably wouldn't have picked up Halo Reach if I didn't get it as a freebie at a fancy launch event last Wednesday.
how so? I thought it was pretty well rounded. If anything, it's multiplayer is well balanced, despite how much it changed. It's kinda hard to rush a game for three years, lol.
There's some definite stuttering during cut-scenes. It's not excessive but it is very obvious when it happens if you're sensitive to it (which I am). For what it's worth this is with the game installed to HD.
This. They try to hide it with a strange motion blur effect. Looks odd. Plus the effect is only used in the cutscenes when the framerate dives. You never see it ingame.