Skripka
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2012
- Messages
- 10,791
We just have a strong disagreement here. HL2 has virtually no plot and ridiculously long, pointless levels that are nothing but repetitive filler crap that add nothing to the story. I don't care if a game serves as a bench tool for computer systems.
I love all 3 Mass Effect games and have spent hundreds of hours playing/replaying them. I thought ME3 was fantastic even before the revamped ending. As much as people dumped on ME3's ending, HL2's was infinitely worse. Once the extended/improved ending was introduced, ME3 vaulted to the best game of the last 5 years, IMO.
Again, we're just not going to agree on this one.
It is called pacing. HL2 does it with puzzles interspersed with linear 3d map action...ME2 does pacing with cheesy dialogue and alnost always 2d map linear run and gun action. For me me1 I could replay, me2 and me3 were one offs.