![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
Wiki said:
No it is not. It is evidence that on average, men score better at the math SAT test than women. Why this is the case either requires much deeper research, or is the product of opinion.
Mozilla foundation is just as bad.
It won't be long. Transgender men will be competing against women, and women will no longer win any events. They may need to have new categories in sports events for fairness: XY chromosome, XX chromosome, and hodgepodge.i was thinking, it'll be pretty hilarious when all this gender madness reach the olympics
The idea that transgendered men will compete against women is just stupid. They might as well allow women on roids to compete, because that would be a fair match.
The validity of standardized tests has already been deeply researched and universities have been moving away from using them for years and the tests that are being used have been redesigned. Don't believe me, however, listen to David Coleman instead:
Yes because millions of men are rushing to go on hormones and have their painful sex re-assignment surgery to win a gold medal...
I completely agree, but it's already happening.
The issue isn't why they have re-assignment surgery or that it isn't needed to medically help their gender dysphoria, the issue is that their body's growth on testosterone is very different than a woman's who doesn't have those kind of levels of testosterone.
except part of the testing that goes on is a specific hormone level so a trans woman has to have the hormone level of any other woman competing - Trans folks have to go on hormone therapy for a lifetime - it's not just reassignment surgery and boom your a man or woman - a man going through it would lose muscle mass due to the hormone therapy so the only realy argument is increased lung capacity which i can see as potentially unfair in specific competitions - but I think it would be sport dependant. A trans woman would have no advantage in say, archery or bobsled
Did you watch the 2016 Olympics? There was a pre-surgery transgendered competing in one of the women's track and field events. Didn't win, but was competing at that level.i was thinking, it'll be pretty hilarious when all this gender madness reach the olympics
Actually, fuck it, i will do it. Addressing each of retarded points would take too long (the wage gap for the same work one is brilliant on it's own), i've got The International to watch.
True but Mozilla has no where near the power of Google to impose their prejudice on others...
Not necessarily... There are other reasons beside failure for not completing his PhD program. He may have financial problems. Like Bill Gates he may have felt he was already prepared enough to pursue his career goals without the Phd. I can completely understand if he was sickened by the hypocrisy of the PC/SJW culture infecting academia today...
Wage Gap Counter Argument: Women earn 79 for every dollar men earn. When truly compared for the identical work (not just job title, but hours worked, education, past experience, overtime, etc. ), they the gap is under 5%. You don't have to agree, but do you know the difference between a earning difference and a pay difference? Because the number you quote is based on the total payout and no attempt to normalize based on the above factors is made.
I don't really care about his character nor care for character assassinations. He could be a mass murderer, it doesn't make his points any less valid.
I never said that degrees matter. You might be responding to someone else.
The discrimination at google (and many other "progressive" places) is against males, I don't even know how can you claim that with a straight face, that recognizing the discrimination that is happening is discrimination :-D
And you don't understand the text, nowhere did he conclude that women as a group are inferior. And even if it did it should be taken as a compliment by the women who are actually good at it. If someone would tell me that people like me are statistically inferior at my job, that would make me proud because I know I'm good at it despite coming from a group where that is unusual. Or are you suggesting that women are infants who have no self-esteem who must be propped up externally to achieve something?
And congratulations, you successfully debunked diversity politics. That's exactly why you can't find 50% women in tech, because they're not interested in it.
I actually think that his essay is extremely polite as far as anti-sjw thinking goes. I don't think there would be a way to express these things any less offensively. There is absolutely nothing hurtful or discriminating or even factually incorrect in it. Everyone up in arms about it either
![Zarathustra[H]](https://cdn.hardforum.com/data/avatars/m/9/9298.jpg?1707758471){kind=avatar}
In your opinion, what makes him awful? Please cite his work in context if you could.
[citations, please]
Man, the whole topic here is that there is no diversity of opinion and knowledge in those so-called "diverse" organizations. You either agree with the company bias or you get fired, and you have no issues with that at all.
According to the reports coming out, there are a lot of people in Google who agree with what he wrote yet they haven't been fired. Therefore apparently Google *does* tolerate diversity of opinion, specifically some of the things he opined about, yet the way he packaged it violated their workplace standards.
How many of these people actually expressed their opinion beyond answering an anonymous survey? And if we're going by a stray interview or two then these interviews do state that they have to keep their opinions to themselves.
Ok (trying hard not to explain in very colorful language what I think of you based on your post here) I don't think you read his memo at all or you didn't attempt to read it without whatever left-leaning hypocrisy that is instilled in a great number of our youth. He states tendencies of factual real world circumstances. Easiest example is that men tend to be stronger than women. Simple biological fact. However it in no way means that EVERY man is stronger than EVERY woman. I have met many a male that would lose to a slight breeze. If you actually try to understand his view point you would quickly see he is speaking to the underlying issue, Why aren't there more women venturing into the field? He doesn't say they aren't capable in any form be it intelligence, physically or some asinine sexist reason. He touches on TYPICAL behaviors and how they do not parallel ones typical of the field. He even goes so far as to give reasonable ways to combat this, so much so as changing the positions to better suit these traits. He is actually attempting to help fulfill Googles goal by addressing the underlying issue rather than using a quota which has no real benefit in a fair and non-discriminatory work environment. If he were the sexist pig most of you defaming individuals claim, he would have only complained of the practice and whined rather than offer alternative means. He does make the attempt to meet them halfway by acknowledging their efforts as well as commenting on their practices that have created a hostile work environment of oppression.
Ok like button is not enough here... is there a LOVED it button.