Blade-Runner
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Messages
- 4,356
Norton would have to pay me to run their bloated crapware! ESET NOD32 all the way baby!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I give the author credit for being spot on in the first two paragraphs of the linked article. It fits this thread perfectly.
"Funny thing about Symantec's security programs: Lots of people still hate them. Like, really hate them. I guess the bloated, sluggish, more-harm-than-good versions of yesteryear were enough to turn some users off Symantec forever, even though the products have improved dramatically in the past several years.
Indeed, several of the company's Norton tools are perennial award-winners, and have been since the early days of Windows 7. And yet I know that at least some readers will see this deal and write, "Norton AntiVirus? No way, never again.""
If you look here it shows MSE with the third worst detection out of 15 AVs, it is however the only AV with 0 false positives.
I've heard that Norton is better than it used to be, but I still wouldn't want it. I've been using Avast for a while and it's starting to get bloated so I've been thinking of switching but it won't be to Norton.
Every system in the last 5 years that has been completely hosed with massive viri and malware infections was running Norton, McAfee, or Kaspersky.
Every system I've seen running Sophos, ESET, or MSE has been completely clean.
Fuck Norton AV.
Show us the evidence, or you are just trolling the most popular.
How do you know that systems running are Sophos, ESET, or MSE have been completely clean?