German Report Calls Tesla’s Autopilot A “Hazard”

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by HardOCP News, Oct 10, 2016.

  1. HardOCP News

    HardOCP News [H] News

    Messages:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1969
    I wish people would get this right. Why doesn't anyone seem to understand that the feature, when used correctly, is not a hazard. It's the stupid "Autopilot" name that is a hazard to (dumb) people's safety.

    A new study from Germany’s Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) found that the autopilot feature of the Tesla Model S constitutes a “considerable traffic hazard,” according to a report in Der Spiegel. Unsurprisingly, Tesla CEO Elon Musk doesn’t agree and today said in a tweet that those reports were “not actually based on science,” and repeated that “Autopilot is safer than manually driven cars.”
     
    Jim Kim, burton14e7 and Talyrius like this.
  2. Quix

    Quix 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,707
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    It's a hazard because people are idiots, not because the feature doesn't do what it's supposed to do. I kinda understand the logic, a lot of things are illegal because people are too stupid to use them responsibly but I'm not sure this is the right course here. Maybe start by enforcing more rigid standards for advertising claims?
     
  3. azuza001

    azuza001 Gawd

    Messages:
    692
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2012
    Should tesla change the name of its autopilot feature? Yes. Is it their fault that people are morons when it comes to this stuff, and it's not a case of people thinking they understand a feature based just off the name but them assuming it does something that it does not based off of preconceived notions? No, but they probably should have still seen this coming.
     
  4. spugm1r3

    spugm1r3 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,153
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2012
    They should have called it Co-Pilot... it would have been for more accurate, and way less of a legal hazard.
     
    mullet, Koween and Mut1ny like this.
  5. Mut1ny

    Mut1ny [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,854
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2013
    Co-pilot would be the perfect name for this. Don't know if you came up with this on your own but you certainly did a better job then Tesla did, and you did it for free!
     
    spugm1r3 likes this.
  6. mullet

    mullet [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,629
    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2004
    I vote "Back seat driver"
     
  7. M76

    M76 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,002
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    Those are the people claiming it's a hazard.

    Or the people misusing it without reading the goddamn manual.

    I really hope the technology is not repressed because tesla's marketing division is filled by idiots. And lawmakers are even bigger idiots.
     
  8. amddragonpc

    amddragonpc [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,996
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2012
    "Ridiculous mode" is what AutoPilot should have been called.
     
  9. Olle P

    Olle P Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    331
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2010
    No, it's a hazard because what it's supposed to do is to cause danger.
    The autopilot is good enough to have the human driver relax and not drive most of the time.
    The problem is that when the autopilot comes short, one way or the other, the human driver must react and take over more or less immediately to prevent an accident. That's very unlikely going to happen!

    For the autopilot to be safe it will either have to warn the driver a reasonable amount of time (~20s) in advance before handing over the controls, or keep the driver in full control all the time only to provide occasional advice.