GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mega Benchmark: 34% Faster than GTX 1060 6G at 1440p

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by Megalith, Feb 24, 2019.

  1. Megalith

    Megalith 24-bit/48kHz Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,004
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Hardware Unboxed’s latest mega benchmark pits the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti against 33 games at 1440p. Steve found the 1660 Ti performing 34% faster on average compared to the GTX 1060 6G, with significant differences in titles such as Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Rainbow Six Siege, and Apex Legends. While the GPU performed similarly to the GTX 1070 (“same performance”), it was 14% slower on average than the RTX 2060 and 8% slower on average than the Radeon RX Vega 56.
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2019
    Jim Kim likes this.
  2. Nobu

    Nobu 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,921
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    In case you don't feel like watching all that fancy video, here's the article with all the boring graphs and text. ;)

    Too bad! They didn't write an updated article yet, though they do apparently have the graphs on patreon.
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2019
  3. Nightfire

    Nightfire [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,450
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2017
    No that was the first video. Techspot did not publish HUB's 33 game benchmark yet. However, you can got to the patreon page to view all of the graphs.
     
    Nobu likes this.
  4. YARDofSTUF

    YARDofSTUF [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,469
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2001
    I'm assuming you mean the 1660 ti is faster than the 1060, not the 1660.
     
    Megalith and jmilcher like this.
  5. Ocellaris

    Ocellaris Ginger @le, an alcoholic's best friend.

    Messages:
    18,777
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2008
    Also the article mentions 38% and 40%, not “34% on average”

    Should just take away Megalith’s ability to post tech news and stick with click bait.
     
  6. Nobu

    Nobu 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,921
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Ah, my mistake. The graphs all looked the same as in the video (which I watched earlier today) so I thought it was the same.
     
    Nightfire likes this.
  7. Nightfire

    Nightfire [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,450
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2017
    The 38% and 40% was from the article Nobu wrongly posted. Perhaps they should take away your ability to post.
     
  8. Ocellaris

    Ocellaris Ginger @le, an alcoholic's best friend.

    Messages:
    18,777
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2008
    The article link in the OP goes to a 404 (at least on mobile), I’m still +1 here.
     
  9. Nobu

    Nobu 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,921
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Weird, worked for me earlier. I've edited my post, sorry for all the confusion. lol
     
  10. Nightfire

    Nightfire [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,450
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2017
    From the HUB video linked:
    Screenshot_20190224-170705_YouTube.jpg Screenshot_20190224-170813_YouTube.jpg
     
  11. craigdt

    craigdt [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,029
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2016
    Pretty good performer.

    Seems decent value, right?
     
  12. Azrak

    Azrak Gawd

    Messages:
    754
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2015
    In today's (and probably forever) screwed up pricing, yeah, it is.
     
    Nukester likes this.
  13. Nanogrip

    Nanogrip Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    430
    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2016
    I am really like this GTX 1660 Ti. I might get one this week and put my RX 580 for sale.
     
  14. PsyaNyde

    PsyaNyde n00b

    Messages:
    11
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2018
    A Vega56 can be had for £250 now, so that's looking to be where i'm heading, the top end 1660ti's are up to £350! and anyone paying that is insane as it's the same price as a 2060, these cards are way overpriced imho.
     
    daglesj likes this.
  15. benedict

    benedict n00b

    Messages:
    37
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2018
    No, that's supposedly a midrange card and midrange is at 200$, not 300$.
     
  16. Calavaro

    Calavaro Whiskey & Honey

    Messages:
    8,006
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2001
    How well does a Vega 56 undervolt, and where does the powerdraw end up?
     
  17. Derangel

    Derangel [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    17,336
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Pity those prices don't carry over to the US. At $250, for a card with a not-shit cooler, the Vega 56 would be a steal.

    From what I've heard they undervolt decently, but the exact amount will vary from card to card.
     
  18. Ranulfo

    Ranulfo [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,404
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    I had no idea the 1060 had ever been considered an actual 1440p card.
     
    craigdt, Olle P and Marees like this.
  19. IdiotInCharge

    IdiotInCharge [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,669
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2003
    Drop the settings, don't try to run the latest AAA stuff?

    All depends on what you play, I'd think.
     
    Nightfire likes this.
  20. Dodge245

    Dodge245 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    180
    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2018
    Runs fine for me, the first game I've had to put on low is APEX Legends, however something like RE2 I have running at medium-high at 60fps.

    I pick up most my games on sale these days so tend to run 6-12 months behind new releases, RE2 being an exception to that. I plan to pick up FC5 the next time it goes on sale...
     
    Marees likes this.
  21. TangledThornz

    TangledThornz Gawd

    Messages:
    619
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2018
    Coming from a GTX 1060 the 1660 Ti doesn't seem like a worthy upgrade for the money. I'd pay extra for a RTX 2060, which I did, for that extra GTX 1080-like speed plus added RTX features. However I'd be more than OK with a 1660 Ti for a fresh new build too.
     
  22. SvenBent

    SvenBent 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,843
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    In NuclearTime math that would be 134% faster ( ppl who know will get it )
     
    Nightfire likes this.
  23. Incontentia Buttocks

    Incontentia Buttocks [H]Lite

    Messages:
    94
    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2016
    I'm still using my GTX970 SSC at 1080p and have no plans to upgrade to 1440 or 2160 anytime soon. Is there a cheap upgrade path or is it still unnecessary? I don't see well enough to need a shit-ton of eye candy settings maxed out.
     
    knowom likes this.
  24. craigdt

    craigdt [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,029
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2016
    I used my 3gb 1060 at 1440 and it was a great performer. Now, I was not running the latest AAA games at max quality but that little card is a beast.

    Obviously, pales in comparison to better models though
     
    Nightfire and knowom like this.
  25. Devilpup

    Devilpup 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,048
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    sadly, my hangup with new cards doesn't come from gpu clock but from vram. i max my 1060 6b with a modded Skyrim, which at this point is almost an 8 year old game. i get it that for the most part the lower vram is "good enough" for most current games, but the whole reason i game on PC is for the mods. if i just want to play a base game i do that on console because i don't have to deal with crashes.
     
    Marees likes this.
  26. Ranulfo

    Ranulfo [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,404
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Sure, thats true of many cards but that is not how they sold the 1060, either nvidia or the vaunted tech reviewers. Its been considered the top end 1080p card since its release. This strikes me as a review guide talking point being pushed.
     
  27. ZodaEX

    ZodaEX 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,711
    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Consult the system requirements of all the games you play to see if an upgrade is necessary.
     
  28. Full Otto

    Full Otto [H]Lite

    Messages:
    99
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2017
    If you're at 1080p 60Hz and fine with med-high settings, you should be OK I would think, especially if you're not an AA snob like me. If you were maxing out your VRAM in anything it would already be obvious. I guess it depends on what you consider an upgrade. Depending on how your card clocks, it could be trading blows with a stock 1060, which has fewer shader units and a narrower memory bus but much higher GPU clocks. Generally, a stock 1060 is ~15% faster then a 970. It's worth keeping in mind that the Turing (not Tensor, the actual raster parts) cores seem to have increased their efficiency in DX12/Vulkan over Maxwel and Pascal.

    So given the results in this review, the 1660 Ti would be right around the minimum performance upgrade over a 970 imo. Cards seem available at 279, but you'll need 300+ to get a better cooler/pcb. Personally, I like to see at least 50% increase in single card performance at a given price, with the goal of raising framerates in games that struggle and cranking quality in games that don't. Being in your shoes, I would look for a killer deal on a 1070 Ti in the 300-350 range, though I've already seen the occasional basic 2060 pop up for <400. If you don't need more performance or want to crank the quality any higher, I'd say you're fine for awhile. The newer games seem really good at scaling down, likely due to them all having consoles in mind these days. If something comes out that finally saturates that 3.5GB at your settings, you can jump off that bridge when you get there.

    I'm kinda in the same boat with my 1070. The next step up would be 1080 Ti tier performance (2080, RVII), which right now costs as much or more then the launch MSRP of the 1080 TI for NIB cards. With the water block this card cost me $500 and is well over 2 years old. Having to spend 50% more to get 50% more performance just doesn't right at this point. I think it's obvious that they don't care about selling upgrades anymore, they are fine filling an expanding market and testing how high they can push pricing.