![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
I have explained fsb/ram ratio ealier here:
The atx version with the very same chip includes the divider, so there is no logic, keeping it away from this board. It's high time that at least one company gets the head out of the 'matx is not for oc'-box which they have all been in for way to long. Ya I could not agree more. Am I complaigning? You bet. Is there anything better? Not yet.Basically they are saying they have no intentions of providing a 1:1 divider then. Sucks but not much we can do about it. Its still a better mobo than the F-I90 HD and the best Conroe overclocking mATX out so far. We'll have to live with it till someone one-ups Gigabyte. ASUS maybe?
I have the time to install the CPU, HSF, and Northbridge cooler.
E6400
Alpha Pre9060 with Panasonic 92mm 1BX Fan
Swiftech MCu159 with 40mm fan on the Northbridge.
The Enzotech SB cooler won't fit on the SB. Thats $17 wasted.
Hope the pic works.
I wrote gigabyte and asked them about the 1:1 divider (In the most polite manner, of course...). Maybe we all should write them and ask them to include it in the next (beta)bios?
It's time that there would be a non-bs oc matx and that it is only a memory divider that keeps this board back is
Yes, is is an xxxS2 but since there is no S3 matx version - and the S2 is sold for S3 prices - GB at least should consider listening to their customers.
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Support/ServiceCenter.aspxWhat address did you use to ask politely? It wouldn't be such a bad idea to drop them a line, I think. At least it should be better to ask GB directly than to whine on a forum...
1.48-1.49v with my [email protected] (fsb@385)
Anywho... I figure the full G35 model will have the best potential for overclocking.It's the south bridge that had me confused. If one is not using the onboard vid, shouldn' the G33 then maybe be better? The G33 and P35 are (besides video de-activated in the latter) basically the same right? Surely, if using the integrated video the X3500 of G35 sounds better - that is if Intel gets their drivers in order. Somehow strange that they will launch a never north bridge with an older south bridge. Probably a cost consideration.
That's right!
Yeah, it's actually strange that the companies don't have to post what chips they are using. With sticks like, e.g. low-mid-end corsair you won't know before you see the rev. and look it up. I for example paid extra to get the 6400 corsair modules instead of their normal 5300 series, just to discover that they have the very same chips! Surely, chips can be hand-picked, but I doubt that is the case with these sticks. Well, they oc quite well and were cheap, so I don't complain.Thats a great list! I remember when it was being done for BH-5. I must have had Micron D9GKX (B6-25E) on those Dominators. They did 1100MHz, but for already being rated PC8500, I expected much more. Probably a good thing did not gamble on the Crucial 8000 Ballistix deal I posted earlier!
!!)those sticks are generally micron D9 (D9GKX or D9GMH!):
(Need to find some electrical tape...)
