First GTX 760 3dMark11 score posted at HWbot.org

[SonDa5]

http://hwbot.org/submission/2394371_hades_3dmark11___performance_geforce_gtx_760_9380_marks


Even with an over clocked Haswell at 4.8GHZ its not looking like an earth shattering performing video card.

I know many people here will think this synthetic benchmark is insignificant but to me and many other video card enthusiast who enjoy bench marking and gaming HWbot.org is significant and you can find real video card performance data at hwbot.org. I don't buy any hardware without doing some research at hwbot.org.

 

[Araxie]

yeah that are always resalted on every review of that, it have lower score on synthetics benchmark than 660ti even my non OC'd 660TI score better(Graphics Score:9665 Pscore:9425) on 3dmark11 than oc'd 760 but thats not directly traduced ingames as the 760perform similar and in some case bit better than 660ti..

 

[SonDa5]

Another day and a second 3dMark11 score is up at hwbot.org by a different over clocker. This time score is lower and Gigabyte Windforce GTX 760 is over clocked to 1,267/1,752MHz.

http://hwbot.org/submission/2394795_havli_3dmark11___performance_geforce_gtx_760_9010_marks/


Not looking good. My MSI GTX 560ti 448 was comparable at this benchmark at much slower clock speeds and I bought it new for alot less money.

 

[Araxie]

hes using a 2500k.. the graphics score its pretty similar with yours.. 9350vs9304 the big difference its the CPU, that GPU hurt badly the Combined Results CPU+GPU on the 3dMark11, your physics score its huge, but combined its on pair with a 2500k wich score 8553 on physics..?