Facebook's Internal Rulebook on Sex, Terrorism, and Violence Leaked

Megalith

24-bit/48kHz
Staff member
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
13,000
The social network’s playbook for deciding what its 2 billion users can post have been revealed for the first time. More than a hundred documents provide insight on what its moderators do when they face questionable content such as videos of violent deaths and photos of animal abuse. Interestingly, the former may be retained instead of deleted for “creating awareness of issues such as mental illness,” while the former is considered acceptable enough to be shared. Facebook also allows people to livestream attempts to self-harm because it “doesn’t want to censor or punish people in distress.”

The Guardian has seen more than 100 internal training manuals, spreadsheets and flowcharts that give unprecedented insight into the blueprints Facebook has used to moderate issues such as violence, hate speech, terrorism, pornography, racism and self-harm. There are even guidelines on match-fixing and cannibalism. The Facebook Files give the first view of the codes and rules formulated by the site, which is under huge political pressure in Europe and the US. They illustrate difficulties faced by executives scrabbling to react to new challenges such as “revenge porn” – and the challenges for moderators, who say they are overwhelmed by the volume of work, which means they often have “just 10 seconds” to make a decision.
 
While i do not trust facebook in the slightest, i will refrain from forming a full opinion on these files until I can personally access them in their entirety, and not in the slanted viewpoint of a website/journalist/someone else's agenda.
 
Nothing against reading things for oneself. However, I would like to hear any and all speculation about the "agenda" of Nick Hopkins and The Guardian. What are you hinting at? Why cast such aspersions?
not in the slanted viewpoint of a website/journalist/someone else's agenda
 
Facebook, the new "Rotten.com"

latest
 
Back
Top