Employment Tribunal Rules That Uber Drivers Are Employees

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by HardOCP News, Oct 28, 2016.

  1. HardOCP News

    HardOCP News [H] News

    Messages:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1969
    Uber better hurry the hell up with its autonomous self-driving fleet of cars before they end up having to treat all their drivers as employees instead of independent contractors.

    The case concerned two individual Uber drivers, but the general union GMB actually brought the case to the tribunal. “This is a monumental victory that will have a hugely positive impact on drivers… and for thousands more in other industries where bogus self-employment is rife,” the union’s legal director said in a statement.
     
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2016
  2. sfsuphysics

    sfsuphysics I don't get it

    Messages:
    13,661
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    Had to look at the article to find out where this was because my first thought was "Who the fuck has an 'Employment Tribunal' are we in the 4th century?" oh the UK, that explains things.
     
    Vercinaigh likes this.
  3. -=SOF=-WID99

    -=SOF=-WID99 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    219
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    umm thats the UK ..not the USA and the right to work states here in the USA

    remember they were banned in some pa cities ..like philly ..till they could TAX them
     
  4. Mohonri

    Mohonri [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,734
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    I'm sorry, but I have a hard time taking him seriously with a statement like that.
     
    jwcalla likes this.
  5. Uvaman2

    Uvaman2 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,955
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    Yeah, I know that retarded third-world country the UK.. what the fuck do they know about anything.
     
  6. dgz

    dgz [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,038
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    I just want to know what's that thing on the roof
     
  7. Twisted Kidney

    Twisted Kidney 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,503
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2013
    There's a general standard for a contractor in every country. That person has to be self employed in their own business in that they have more than one customer and clearly spread their work among them. When you are a single employee company that only has one customer you are an employee of your "customer" and both you and your employer are falsifying your status to avoid benefits, health care status, employment insurance status, and payroll taxes. Every first world nation has the same basic set of criteria save for a few regions in a couple of those countries where politicians take payments from companies and supply the service of voiding legally binding contracts and ignoring legal transgressions for companies that are large enough to afford such premium political services.
     
    Dunnlang, MrTryfe, Flatline and 2 others like this.
  8. Tsumi

    Tsumi [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    12,967
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2010
    If Uber drivers are employees, that means Uber will essentially be a taxi service with the exception being that drivers use their own cars, and will have to be subject to the same laws and regulations taxi companies have.

    It should be recognized that Uber is providing a marketplace, and that marketplace is for the selling of ride services. Uber regulates that marketplace, and in return, they take a cut. If drivers feel the rates are too low, just refuse to drive at that rate. A lot of people are unable to accurately calculate the costs of driving those miles, but IMO that is on them, not Uber. If you want the costs calculated for you and a car provided, go work for a taxi or limo company.
     
  9. Cmdrmonkey

    Cmdrmonkey Gawd

    Messages:
    1,013
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Legit independent contractors are really rare. The majority of 1099 contractors are employees who are getting shafted by their employers. They get screwed out of benefits and left with a huge tax bill that their employer should be paying.

    If the IRS did it's job properly, you'd see a lot of employers who pull the 1099 misclassification scam on their employees getting taken to court for tax fraud.
     
    Shmee and MrTryfe like this.
  10. sfsuphysics

    sfsuphysics I don't get it

    Messages:
    13,661
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    well there's one thing they know a lot about

    [​IMG]
     
    alxlwson likes this.
  11. Xerack

    Xerack Gawd

    Messages:
    587
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Okay, so Steve....was that you that photo shopped the Terminator into the drivers seat? ;)
     
  12. MV75

    MV75 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,025
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    They didn't quite get their self driving fleet before they were found out. lol.
     
  13. SvenBent

    SvenBent 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,786
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Because USA is so modern...

    - Check and faxes are still a thing.
    - I still cant pay everything online. (Had to go to the office of the fraeking water supplier with a void check)
    - Government still working with physical papers.
    - Chip card still in integration process when 1st world countries are already going away from cards at all.

    Stones and glasshouse and everything...
     
  14. pxc

    pxc [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    33,064
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2000
    Uber wants it both ways: control over how tasks are done like an employer, but no employer obligations. A workforce of bona fide (sub)contractor drivers is possible, but it's far from the service Uber offers.
     
    Dunnlang likes this.
  15. Mohonri

    Mohonri [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,734
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    My understanding of contractors (at least in the US) goes like this: in order to qualify, the employer can't specify the hours where the contractor works, nor can they make the contractor work in a specific location. And they can't be contractors for more than a certain period of time.
     
  16. pxc

    pxc [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    33,064
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2000
    In the US it doesn't have as much to do with where they work, or for how long, but the specific control an employer has over a "contractor". This is the IRS test for an independent contractor: Independent Contractor (Self-Employed) or Employee?

    This is why Uber has problems in the US and other venues:

    Uber has problems with tests 1 and 2.
     
  17. InorganicMatter

    InorganicMatter [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,231
    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2004
    Employee v. independent contractor is a rigorous test courts apply that looks at several objective factors. It's not a subjective "we think you're gaming the system" smell test.