Ditching my Wireless G! What's your take?

Mr. Baz

2[H]4U
Joined
Aug 17, 2001
Messages
2,815
PfSense is overkill, All the added packages just add more holes to hack. Stick with a small router based firewall but if you are feeling more advanced - use a third party Merlin or dd-wrt firmware with an iptables script.

This statement has no facts to back it up, nor does it make any valid sense what-so-ever.
 

Mr. Baz

2[H]4U
Joined
Aug 17, 2001
Messages
2,815
Work on your reading comprehension and realize that less is sometimes more.

For example..

https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-11749/product_id-21763/Pfsense-Pfsense.html

Actually, IdiotInCharge's reading comprehension skills must be better than your own.

You apparently have never done any security work. Literally everything has vulnerabilities. That is why we harden them.

_________________________________________________________

Look! I can do that too!!!

Cisco: https://www.cvedetails.com/product-list/vendor_id-16/Cisco.html
Palo Alto: https://www.cvedetails.com/vendor/12836/Paloaltonetworks.html
Juniper: https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-874/year-2018/Juniper.html
Fortinet: https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-3080/Fortinet.html
_________________________________________________________


The only 'relevant' vulnerability listed is for pfsense 2.4.1, which was fixed in 2.4.2. We are now on 2.4.3. No known vulnerabilities listed....you were saying?

If you received the MS-ISAC vulnerability newsletter, you would be bombarded with an update at least once every other week about some Cisco vulnerability that needs to be patched ASAP (either that or Adobe, or Office).
 
Top