delita
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2014
- Messages
- 1,847
Sold my X34 to a friend, tired of 21:9.
Need some advice! Going back to 16:9, what monitor should I get?
Need some advice! Going back to 16:9, what monitor should I get?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What didn't you like about 21:9? That may drive the decision.
Got tired of lack of support by some developers. I could go 4k or back to 1440p don't really care. Just want 16:9 and a filled screen. Gsync is nice, but not totally necessary. What do you guys think? I'm willing to spend up to 1k would like to see some options. Not 50+ inch TVs though.
what was wrong with the 21:9? I personally won't go back to 16:9 unless I have to, ie, my screen fails and I can't afford to replace it.
That KS7500 sounds like it will make a very nice monitor. Let us know how it works out!
You say 85fps. So is this "real" 120Hz? Little out of the loop. Wasn't sure that was a normalish thing without interpolation etc in nearly anything but PC monitors or 4k TVs at 1080p...
My previous display was a Gsync X34. So, yeah. 85-90 frames is what I was pulling on average in The Witcher 3 with the monitor set at 100hz @ max settings 3440x1440. I'm not sure what you mean by real 120Hz though. I switched to the Samsung and it's only capable of 60hz at 4k. No more Gsync either. But from my few hours of gaming thus far, I think the 4k resolution (and being back at 16:9 aspect ratio) and the overall better picture quality from the Samsung, overtakes the Acer with Gsync by a mile. Hopefully someday there will be NON shitty gaming monitors.
Lazy.
I ran 21:9 for roughly a year (got a cheap 4K TV for a display, sold the monitor for significantly more than the TV cost, needed the cash) and never found an even sort of modern title that couldn't be made to run proper res with some tweaking.
40"+ 4K is your next move as others have said, but it's significantly harder to drive.
Lazy.
I ran 21:9 for roughly a year (got a cheap 4K TV for a display, sold the monitor for significantly more than the TV cost, needed the cash) and never found an even sort of modern title that couldn't be made to run proper res with some tweaking.
40"+ 4K is your next move as others have said, but it's significantly harder to drive.
Ended up buying a Samsung KS7500 43" this morning on Amazon.
Are you in the UK? I'm in the US and can't find this model anywhere.
Bought it on Amazon in the US, no issues.
Got link? I'm not able to find it. Google finds UE43KS7500, but all sites selling it are UK.
With how "mainstream" 21:9 is, I shoudn't have to "tweak" games unofficially to make them work "properly" - I say properly because sometimes the "tweaks" fuck things up in the game related to the UI and scaling. Lot of ports, especially.
I got a better display. And I'm done with 21:9. I wouldn't call that lazy, it's an upgrade.
I'm probably going to do the same as you. I just bought an HP Omen X35 two months ago, great monitor but it's just not completely satisfying. I'll be picking up a C7 OLED this holiday.
The aspect ratio just seems off somehow even when setup properly.