M76
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2012
- Messages
- 14,031
How many investor talks are you privy to? Because I sure as hell am not privy to any of them. It's a bit of dishonest to quote what they said to investors as "they lied to console gamers"The class action lawsuit isn't for the customers. It's for the investors. Nevertheless, they were lied to same as the consumers, so yeah, the lawsuit has merit. Still, you're ignoring what I'm saying. Your fixated on the "bad port" part. Of all those bad ports we've gotten, how many times did the developers say "don't worry, it runs well" before hand? Even saying nothing is less damning that flat out lying. That's what your not understanding. I'll even drop a link for you so there is no confusion on my issue: https://www.gamesradar.com/cyberpun...nt-gen-consoles-according-to-cd-projekts-ceo/. When your CEO says things like "the game is running surprisingly grea
But you continue to dodge the question and still trying to prove what nobody has denied. What shall we do? C'mon tell me. Because obviously you are pissed that we are not pissed enough on behalf of last gen console gamers.
Are you really trying to gotcha me by accusing me of something I admitted in the previous paragraph that you quoted? LOL.You mean to tell me that when PC players get a bad port, they aren't vocal about it? Your "kettle, pot, black" schtick works well here. Every time we get a bad release, the PC community will bitch and moan like anyone else. But when console players get lied to and delivered a broken, unplayable experience, they're just supposed to shut up and take it because it happens more to us than it does to them?
Yeah they can cry me a river, they never cared about PC ports, why should PC Gamers care about this beyond acnkowledging that it is bad then?
As I've mentioned you are pissed off because we aren't pissed off enough. You act as if this is the first time a game was advertised as something it isn't. There were much bigger lies than "runs surprisingly well".This isn't about fixing it, it isn't about a solution. It's that the behavior is not acceptable in the first place. It's not OK to just write off the fact that CDPR lied to millions of customers, and it's not fair to tell those people "sucks that you got lied to, but that's your problem, so shut up about it". Literally, the only thing I expect from anyone is a bit of empathy for the people who were wronged. This whole PC vs. console thing is fucking stupid. We're all playing games, we're all driving the industry. Yes, I think you should be disappointed with CDPR, same as the console players are. I maintain the issue is bigger than a bad port. The issue is communication prior to release. The issue is misleading, or lying to your customers. Kinda like how Witcher 3 looked better at E3 than it did before launch, and people were pissed about the downgrade. Except, we knew about that because we saw those downgrades in updated trailers prior to release. What if CDPR had showed their doctored, E3 version of the game, all the time, every time, right up until release and promised gamers that's exactly how it looked, only find that was a straight lie when you fired the game up for the first time? Would you be mad? Would you be vocal about it? Because that is why console players are mad. That is why they are vocal. Just because it didn't happen to you this time, doesn't mean it hasn't happened before, and doesn't mean it won't happen again. Instead of being at odds, and thinking "at least the console peasants got their dues this time", how about acknowledging that it's not OK regardless of who it's happening to. Seriously, tell me, what do you lose by being supportive of those that were wronged? How does it negatively impact you to acknowledge that CDPR did wrong by millions of customers?
And, again with the strawman argument, will you give it a rest already? Wo is it that does not acknowledge that the vanilla ps4 / xbone version is messed up?
So your answer is that we aren't mad enough, we need to be more vocal on behalf on poor console gamers? Yeah, I'm not going to fight their fight, they never cared about PC ports, and suddenly when they have the short stick we are all friends here? No, that's not how it works.Do I need to quote myself for you? No company says that, which is why I said I don't expect that CDPR should have said that. Obviously that's unreasonable, I made that clear. I even said I think you know I don't mean that (although I guess I was wrong there). I have answered your question regarding what I think should happen.
You are twisting words again. We are not saying "it' not happening to me it's not my problem" we are saying "This is what we have been dealing with for the past 25 years, welcome to the club"I think everyone should be supportive of the people who were lied to instead of saying "it's not happening to me so it's not my problem" and that they need to shut up and get over it. We're all here because we like to play games, and we all want those games to be good. At the very least, we want them delivered as promised. If companies aren't held responsible for misleading their customers, it will keep happening. And as you clearly understand, most of the time, it happens to US. Literally all I'm asking of you is to not be OK with a company lying to it's customers to drive pre-orders and delivery a broken ass, unfinished game. The damage has been done, they cannot take it back, they cannot fix it. That doesn't mean consumers cannot send a clear message that it's unacceptable and can't happen again.
Well I don't think that for a moment. I'm glad I've got the game, despite encountering serious glitches with it.Yes, I do think it would be better if they didn't get the game at all, because then they would still have their money.
B&M stores only refuse refunds on PC games, not on console games last I checked this was about consoles. But sure let's make someone tossing their receipt cdpr's fault as well.Also, CDPR's refund campaign is not the knight in shining armor you think it is. For digital purchases, they told people to go fight it out with MS and Sony (which seems to have been smoothed out now, but was a rocky and probably very frustrating thing to pursue early on). For physical copies, they told people to go back to their place of purchase. But we know very well that B&M retailers do not give refunds on open video games. Not not, now ever. It's against their policy and they are usually unwaveringly firm on that policy. Maybe after a few weeks and a lot of backlash they've let up on that, but I honestly don't know, and I wouldn't be surprised to here that many B&M stores are still not taking the game back. And CDPR's refund help campaign ended December 21st. How convenient that their gracious assistance to gamers ends 4 days before probably hundreds of thousands of copies get pulled out from under a Christmas tree. All those copies with no receipt, no options with B&M's, and CDPR's assistance conveniently over. CDPR did what they had to do to save face while still finding a way to one again stick it to the people they've already fucked over. So no, there are a lot of people with a copy of the game who did not get their option of a refund.
In other words, "I don't care what you have to say" Nice. Then why the hell should I waste my time on your wall of text, you should've started with this and I could've just ignored you altogether.For the sake of completeness, I'll say this one more time just so there is no mistaking it... My issue is not with the state of the game, it's with the way CDPR communicated to players. If you want to continue to discuss that, great. If you want to continue to have a conversation about a bad port, don't bother, because I'm not going to acknowledge it. I can only say so many times that isn't what I'm bothered by.
Last edited: