Crash Bandicoot Is Coming to the PC on July 10th

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by Megalith, Mar 10, 2018.

  1. Megalith

    Megalith 24-bit/48kHz Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,004
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Come summer, the Crash Bandicoot: N-Sane Trilogy will no longer be a Sony exclusive: Activision has announced that the classic platforming games will land on PC, as well as Xbox One and Nintendo Switch, on July 10. The trilogy comprises Crash Bandicoot, Crash Bandicoot 2: Cortex Strikes Back, and Crash Bandicoot 3: Warped.
     
    deaedius likes this.
  2. bugleyman

    bugleyman [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,227
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2010
    Nnnnnnnnice.
     
    Chupachup likes this.
  3. deaedius

    deaedius Gawd

    Messages:
    960
    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2014
    Dang that is awesome, I was hoping it would make it to PC. Good to hear!
     
  4. Ragenrok

    Ragenrok 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    4,083
    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    Sweet! This game is perfect for my laptop while I'm on the road. Excited for this as I have never played them but they look fun
     
    cageymaru likes this.
  5. DigitalPanhandler

    DigitalPanhandler Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    205
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2016
    isn't there a new crash on ps4? or is it just a remaster of the nsane trilogy? why don't we get that? unless this is part of that....

    also when the hell is EA getting back in the pc business with madden? meh, tis probably the only game on console I'm even worried about, and cant justify the prices just for a football game, would love to have em on pc (as well as the crash were getting, so as to not get off subject ;).. )
     
  6. BloodyIron

    BloodyIron 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,440
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    /dev/null and Red Falcon like this.
  7. Krenum

    Krenum [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,745
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    That's cool I guess. Been playing them on emulators for years though.
     
  8. Chupachup

    Chupachup Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    435
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2014
  9. Stoly

    Stoly [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,421
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    right
     
    GoldenTiger, homernoy and robble like this.
  10. tetris42

    tetris42 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,518
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    GoldenTiger likes this.
  11. Viper87227

    Viper87227 [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    17,353
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2004
    Wish I hadn't bought this on PS4... should look great at 4k 60fps on PC. Oh well, guess I'll buy it twice.
     
  12. robble

    robble [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,499
    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2004
    GoldenTiger likes this.
  13. Viper87227

    Viper87227 [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    17,353
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2004
    Agreed. Linux support isn't even close to a realistic expectation. Most AAA games don't get Linux support, why would a port of a remaster of 20 year old game get Linux support?

    Activision would most likely hire out a third party to do a Linux port. I don't know what something like that would cost, but I cannot imagine that there are enough potential customers (for this game) that don't already have at least one of the four available platforms.
     
  14. BloodyIron

    BloodyIron 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,440
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    So fucking what? The actual numerical amount of Linux gamers means that it is financially viable for games to be released for Linux. That's why there's literally a section on STEAM dedicated to it, it has thousands of options now, and is continually growing.

    Stop fixating on useless stats. Market share from a percentage perspective is irrelevant.

    What is relevant? There's TONNES of games that ARE native on Linux, oh, and they're FUN too!

     
  15. Viper87227

    Viper87227 [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    17,353
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2004
    Just because it is financially viable for some games does not automatically mean it would be financially viable for all games. Surely you have to understand that the cost vs. profit ratio of Linux would be far less than any other platform. When it comes to the consoles, there is obviously no question that any money Activision puts into a port will result in a healthy profit. As it is, PC will be their least profitable platform between the relatively low number of sales and the "wait for the Steam sale" mentality that exists on the PC market. Anyone interested in this on PC should be pretty pleased to see a console-only franchise coming to PC at all. Expecting Linux is a stretch, but you seem borderline offended about it not being on that platform. What percentage do you think Linux could make up of the total games sales? 1%? Less? Activision is a business like any other. They make games to make money, not as a favor to you. This is one of those situations where a Linux port is simply not a smart business expense, the risk is not worth the potential reward.
     
    GoldenTiger likes this.
  16. tetris42

    tetris42 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,518
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    I was trying to explain why a multi-billion dollar business driven by shareholders isn't going to consider it seriously and will skip it. You say "stop fixating on useless stats", that's pretty much the only stat that matters to them. If the marketshare isn't there, they won't make it. The number of existing GAMES on Linux is irrelevant to them, it's the number of Linux GAMERS that matter. Personally, I think it would be great if all games came to Linux and gamers didn't need to depend on windows. I think it would be great if I won the lottery too.
     
    GoldenTiger likes this.
  17. Ragenrok

    Ragenrok 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    4,083
    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    I see the calls for Linux games to be a lot like Microsoft and backwards compatibility. Tons of people saying they want it but in reality not many use it.