Cox Communications Sued for in Excess of $1 Billion for Ignoring Piracy by Customers

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by cageymaru, Aug 2, 2018.

  1. cageymaru

    cageymaru [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    19,300
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2003
    Cox Communications has been hit with an over $1 billion lawsuit after multiple record labels sued the ISP for allegedly ignoring copyright infringement by customers. Under US law an ISP must take certain steps when sent a DMCA take down notice. Cox is accused of limiting the amount of notices that it would process and turning a blind eye to pirates. Cox says that it has a "13-strike policy" and but record labels say it would only temporarily disconnect an infringing account. Then accounts were reinstated without repercussions even though some had been warned over 100 times.

    According to the record labels, it is clear that Cox intentionally ignored these repeated copyright infringements. As such, they believe that the ISP is liable for both contributory and vicarious copyright infringement. As compensation for the claimed losses, the companies demand statutory or actual damages, as well as coverage for their attorney fees and other costs.
     
    captaindiptoad likes this.
  2. captaindiptoad

    captaindiptoad Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    366
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2014
  3. pcgeekesq

    pcgeekesq [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,403
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    I have Cox Internet. It's fast, reliable, and affordable. Hopefully none of this will change that.
     
  4. MNKyDeth

    MNKyDeth Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    163
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    If I was Cox I would just cash everything out as fast as I could and just file bankruptancy so they couldn't take any of my monies. Say a good day and fuck you to the customers and leave them to the shills.
     
  5. Qthulu

    Qthulu [H]Lite

    Messages:
    103
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2018
    It's not Cox responsibility to police dmca and wholly shoulder the financial burden of doing so. I've read about the situation with cox and record labels in the past and it amounts to record labels trying to bully Cox into conducting business as they see fit.
     
    5150Joker, Talyrius, Flapjack and 7 others like this.
  6. Twisted Kidney

    Twisted Kidney 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,503
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2013
    Bankruptcy doesn't work that way.
     
  7. bugleyman

    bugleyman [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,227
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2010
    I hate on cable companies as much as the next guy, but since when did Cox become the RIAA's copyright enforcement arm? Hopefully the record labels lose big.
     
    Talyrius, Flapjack, Exercate and 8 others like this.
  8. Jehuty

    Jehuty Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    430
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007
    Fuck record labels.
     
    Talyrius, KarsusTG, Exercate and 12 others like this.
  9. Spidey329

    Spidey329 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,677
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2003

    That's reasonable since the entertainment industry automates the notices to the quantity of spam. It's probably expensive for companies sending out all of the notices just in postage alone.

    If they're not going to pay a reasonable processing fee, I'd say they don't get priority support.
     
  10. NeghVar

    NeghVar 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,442
    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Talyrius, Flapjack, Exercate and 14 others like this.
  11. nutzo

    nutzo [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,371
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2004
    I have Cox, It's fast, reliable, and expensive.
     
    Seelenlos and GushpinBob like this.
  12. Uvaman2

    Uvaman2 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,963
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    I have Cox too, but it has no internet service.
     
    KarsusTG likes this.
  13. toast0

    toast0 Gawd

    Messages:
    903
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Upon reviewing the law, I think Cox falls under the part of the DMCA that applies to 'transitoey digital networks', and if so, there's no fiscal liability; the only relief available is compliance to supoenas of identity of customers (although, per case law, good luck), or having a judge order some customers to be disconnected. Cox isn't hosting any content, so it's not subject to takedown requests.
     
    Flapjack likes this.
  14. RealBeast

    RealBeast Gawd

    Messages:
    648
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Cox will win or their attorneys would have advised them to alter their practices already.

    Contributory and vicarious infringement are very difficult cases for a plaintiff to win.

    Go Cox! (and I refer only to the cable company) ;)
     
    Flapjack, KarsusTG and Makaveli@BETA like this.
  15. Master_shake_

    Master_shake_ [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,232
    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    hahahahaha

    expecting the sue happy "music" companies to provide actual evidence?

    that's adorable.
     
  16. Dead Parrot

    Dead Parrot 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,385
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    How is Cox profiting from its subscriber's alleged piracy activities? Are the alleged pirates sharing profits with Cox? As far as I can tell, Cox collects the same ISP fees regardless of if an end user shares a movie or just views a movie. Seems likes the plaintiffs will have to prove that the alleged violators are using Cox instead of the many other ISPs in the area because of Cox's alleged failures to act on the DMCA notices. At least to make the "profiting from" part of the lawsuit.
     
    Flapjack likes this.
  17. Lenard

    Lenard Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    288
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    I am curious as to what people think is expensive?
    Do you mind sharing your speed and Monthly cost?
     
  18. GNUse_the_force

    GNUse_the_force Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    420
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2014
    There still mad that the internet exists.
     
    SomeoneElse likes this.
  19. Nobu

    Nobu 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,779
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    You could say they're profiting because customers would use another service if Cox enforced their rules, but that's a bit of a stretch.
     
  20. atreidesgoldenpath

    atreidesgoldenpath Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    482
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    This makes me love Cox.
     
    GhostCow and Mode13 like this.
  21. purple_monster

    purple_monster Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    357
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2018
    vpn everything. pirate all content, even netflix shows. bleed em and well be free of these stupid companies. passionate artists will continue to create movies and music without $300 million marketing and effects budgets. itll survive. itll be okay.
     
  22. Krazy925

    Krazy925 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,384
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2012
    Not the person you asked but I had Cox from 2006-2007 in San Diego, pacific beach and over off 55th and El Cajon (can’t believe I remember that) and it was 105mbps/$75month.

    I miss cox. We torrented so much shit. Best ISP I’ve ever had.

    Comcast, ATT, TWC all suck in comparison. I think we had 0 downtime our entire time down there. Speeds were always fast and no need for a VPN. Crazy times
     
  23. The Mad Atheist

    The Mad Atheist Gawd

    Messages:
    910
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2018
    Wouldn't be surprised if the RIAA/MPAA won't be happy til the death penalty is given to pirates.
     
    GhostCow likes this.
  24. Blaze Wedgewood

    Blaze Wedgewood n00b

    Messages:
    20
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2018
  25. nutzo

    nutzo [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,371
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2004
    50mb down, 5mb up, 1TB cap, $85/month.
    Only choice as I can't even get slow DSL.

    Cable TV pricing is even worse.

    Actual price is a little less as I have a small discount for bundling TV and another discount for threatening to cancel the TV service every year :D
     
  26. SomeoneElse

    SomeoneElse [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,719
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    RIAA is always trolling ways to steal people's money since they can't seem to evolve with the times. There are some instances where they have tried to sue over like 30 songs and wanted $100K plus in rewards....30 songs....not even worth that if it was on a CD dipped platinum.....


    They still think CDs and Cassettes are the best way to distribute their content. /s
     
  27. Lenard

    Lenard Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    288
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017

    The purpose of the extreme rewards is to restrain others from stealing music through fear.
    It is probably not too far off to say that people want music for free, and they will download it for free if there is no consequence.
    By getting attention grabbing headlines about grandmothers being bankrupted because grandkids downloaded Bieber they accomplish some suppression. The tactic is effective.
     
  28. atreidesgoldenpath

    atreidesgoldenpath Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    482
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    I agree.
    This works on me, personally.
     
  29. Ozarkboy

    Ozarkboy [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,919
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    I remember getting Cox Cable in 1995 in San Diego. Going from dial up to 6mb, that was an experience. Wasn't maybe a month later I got blocked on Napster for sharing Metallica, lol. Funny thing is I had all their stuff on CD/Cassette/DVD/VHS, well after that was not a fan anymore. I get it, do not sell copied music! Wait, I wasn't selling copy right music, what the heck?

    P.S. I discovered binaries shortly there after, my collection grew......
     
  30. Makaveli@BETA

    Makaveli@BETA 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,301
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2004
    They just mad because they got Cox blocked!
     
  31. Shotglass01

    Shotglass01 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,917
    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    It's not working though. It's doing nothing to stem the tide. So if they go after Cox, and win, then all the ISP's will all fall in to line and serve up notices based on nothing more than an IP address and a fragment of some torrent 'proving' infringement. It's insane.
     
  32. Cyraxx

    Cyraxx 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    4,059
    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Pirates will always be 1 step ahead of both ISPs and ahead of RIAA/MPAA - I don't know why they even try.
     
  33. Cyraxx

    Cyraxx 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    4,059
    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005

    And then I will cancel my service with said ISP and then sign up for the competitor... Then the competitor sends me something, then I cancel and re-sign for my previous ISP under my wife's name. Rinse, repeat, flush, etc...
     
  34. Lenard

    Lenard Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    288
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    I am not sure you can claim it is doing nothing to stem the tide. I suspect that without the ridiculous monetary damages, ISP notifications of cut-off, and discussion about the issues related to piracy due to the RIAA, many thousands of people, who currently don't, would be downloading things for free. Likewise the difficulty of finding good file sharing sites makes it less likely.
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2018
  35. SecretStash

    SecretStash Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    483
    Joined:
    May 27, 2017
    Who wants the price of their subscription to go up due to increased measures needed to police where users go online?
     
  36. DrLobotomy

    DrLobotomy [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,387
    Joined:
    May 19, 2016
    Can I sue the highway department for allowing illegal smuggling?

    Dumbasses.
     
    DejaWiz and KarsusTG like this.
  37. Snakebyt

    Snakebyt [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,560
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2001
    all artists now know they dont make any money from record sales, its all live shows and merch. And sure cox, as well as suddenlink and other will give you a slap on the wrist, thats about all that is needed considering the "crime" . and yes, i would download a god damned car if i could..
     
    KarsusTG likes this.
  38. Shotglass01

    Shotglass01 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,917
    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    The flip side is that Cox wins and thus the other ISP's don't bother sending notices anymore.

    Disagree. As each younger person connects, they immediately start sharing. First it's their goofy challenges, if they survive those, it moves on to films and music. I think sharing has done nothing but increase. You'll find studies and analysis both ways, but if you're not paying for Spotify, you're not paying for music.
     
  39. Lenard

    Lenard Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    288
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    I am not talking about kids. I am talking about 40 y/o guys who have money and don't want to deal with the risk of losing it.

    If there were no RIAA suits, or potential consequences I would buy a 24TB NAS device download everything. I would even download kids movies just in case nephews visit.
    I would have MARVEL marathon weekend viewing parties and have the back catalogue of every major music artist since Clarence "Frogman" Henry.
    I would download every comic book and read it on my Kindle. I have no doubt that there are thousands of people just like myself who only stay out of it because of the hassle and potential risk.
     
  40. Shotglass01

    Shotglass01 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,917
    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    ^^Okay and I still disagree. I think their efforts are for naught.