erek
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2005
- Messages
- 10,785
"This completes the performance overview of Core i9-10980XE through basic benchmarks. Compared to the price when the current Core X series appeared, it is almost half the price, so the cost performance is quite high. However, the drastic price change is also a sign of fear for the competitor's third-generation Ryzen Threadripper. The third-generation Ryzen threat that has overcome weaknesses other than gaming with the 7nm process is also coming to the HEDT market. There is no better way to get insurance.
In addition, if By Specific Core is enabled, power consumption will increase as much as it will go round. There is almost no extreme ultra-high load state like SmallFFT, so you may not need to worry about it for normal use such as gaming. However, considering the possibility of falling in the middle of creative work such as video encoding, it is safe to use the default.
On the other hand, if you use the By Specific Core setting, if you do not mess around the voltage with more detailed settings, it will be a difficult horse to handle. A certain amount of know-how will be required to use it at full performance. In that sense, Core i9-10980XE can be said to be an advanced CPU. I don't know how far that can be packed, but next time I want to verify the usability of Core i9-10980XE, focusing on creative apps."
Source: https://ascii.jp/elem/000/001/981/1981439/
"Intel’s new 18-core Core i9-10980XE isn’t reaching for the stars. It’s reaching for the middle. Squeezed by AMD’s consumer 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X on one end, and the 32-core Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the other, it can’t win on raw performance. But with Intel’s aggressive pricing at $1,000, it actually competes well on bang for buck, a tempting deal for the content creators who are the prime market for this chip. "
Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/345...0xe-review-winning-the-middle.html#tk.rss_all
In addition, if By Specific Core is enabled, power consumption will increase as much as it will go round. There is almost no extreme ultra-high load state like SmallFFT, so you may not need to worry about it for normal use such as gaming. However, considering the possibility of falling in the middle of creative work such as video encoding, it is safe to use the default.
On the other hand, if you use the By Specific Core setting, if you do not mess around the voltage with more detailed settings, it will be a difficult horse to handle. A certain amount of know-how will be required to use it at full performance. In that sense, Core i9-10980XE can be said to be an advanced CPU. I don't know how far that can be packed, but next time I want to verify the usability of Core i9-10980XE, focusing on creative apps."
Source: https://ascii.jp/elem/000/001/981/1981439/
"Intel’s new 18-core Core i9-10980XE isn’t reaching for the stars. It’s reaching for the middle. Squeezed by AMD’s consumer 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X on one end, and the 32-core Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the other, it can’t win on raw performance. But with Intel’s aggressive pricing at $1,000, it actually competes well on bang for buck, a tempting deal for the content creators who are the prime market for this chip. "
Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/345...0xe-review-winning-the-middle.html#tk.rss_all
Last edited: