Cinebench R20 Is Available on the Microsoft Store and Apple Store

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by cageymaru, Mar 5, 2019.

  1. cageymaru

    cageymaru [H]ard|News

    Messages:
    19,266
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2003
    Cinebench R20 is the latest CPU benchmark from Maxon and it is available for download from the Microsoft Store and Apple Store. Maxon has provided instructions for its use as many features of the program have been modernized to incorporate the latest advances of today's hardware and to reflect the capabilities of Cinema 4D. The new Cinebench R20 benchmark uses four times as much memory as Cinebench R15, requires 8x the computational power, and still retains the single core test option. This means the results of testing performed with Cinebench R15 aren't comparable to Cinebench R20 runs.

    Users can manually define a custom number of up to 256 render threads, even if your machine does not have that many cores. Cinebench R20 and Cinema 4D R20 incorporate the latest rendering architectures, including integration of Intel's Embree raytracing technology and advanced features on modern CPUs from AMD and Intel that allow users to render the same scene on the same hardware twice as fast as previously. No GPU support has been added to the benchmark.

    Anyone who needs to evaluate hardware performance should add Maxon Cinebench to their testing arsenal. System administrators can use Cinebench to help make purchase decisions, journalists can use the results in reviewing hardware, hardware manufacturers can utilize the feedback in optimizing their latest products. Any computer owner can evaluate their individual system. Unlike abstract benchmarks, which only test specific functions of CPUs, Cinebench offers a real-world benchmark that incorporates a user's common tasks within Cinema 4D to measure a system's performance. Improvements to Cinebench Release 20 reflect the overall advancements to CPU and rendering technology in recent years, providing a more accurate measurement of Cinema 4D's ability to take advantage of multiple CPU cores and modern processor features available to the average user.
     
  2. arnemetis

    arnemetis 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,481
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    I gave it a try. Been using my pc all day, didn't bother stopping processes or anything. The regular run was pretty quick, single core took a good while. 8700k @ 5.1ghz (-2 avx offset so 4.9ghz for this test) w/ 32gb @ 3200mhz & cl14. 3,729 multi, 506 single, 7.38x MP ratio.
     
  3. Gideon

    Gideon [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    2,000
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    3689 multi is what I got with my 1700X at 3.9 and 32 gigs of ram at 3200 speeds. Not a clue if that is good or garbage tho.
     
  4. techguymaxc

    techguymaxc [H]Lite

    Messages:
    80
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    8039 on a 7960x @ 4GHz. According to the built-in result database a stock 1950x scores 6670. Be interesting to see a 24 core or 32 core Threadripper result.
     
  5. Azrak

    Azrak Gawd

    Messages:
    733
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2015
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2019
  6. chaos4u

    chaos4u Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    341
    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2004
    Funny thing is :
    Supported Systems
    PC
    Windows 7 SP1 64-bit or higher
    Intel or AMD 64-bit CPU
    with SSE3 & 4GB RAM


    maybe we will get a stand alone with out the need of windows 10 hijinks, some time the next few weeks.

    any way heres my result 7170

    bench_r20.png
     
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2019
  7. jaffy

    jaffy [H] Custodian

    Messages:
    5,557
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    4726 with an i9 9900k @5.0 across all cores. 3200 RAM. Will test with higher frequencies and more voltage over the next 24 hours, as we're in for some cooler than normal weather lol
     
  8. Auer

    Auer Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    454
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2018
    1332 with a Xeon 1620-0!!
     
  9. craigdt

    craigdt Gawd

    Messages:
    1,015
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2016
    Thank goodness.
    What is this Windows Store BS

    Edit-

    3310 on my stock 8700K with 3200Mhz RAM
     
  10. thecold

    thecold Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    254
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2017
    intel xeon 1505mv6 (3.6 all core boost) 1941 (Lenovo p51)
    Intel 7820x @ 4.6 4700
    Intel 7740x @ 4.5 (stock) 2367
     
  11. Algrim

    Algrim [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,380
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2016
    Eight year old Mac Pro showing its age: 2919
     
  12. CAD4466HK

    CAD4466HK [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,219
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Phenom II X4 975 BE @ (stock) 3.6GHz - 762 4.0GHz - 894 slooooooow.

    That old server is still faster than a i5-5300U though. :p
     
  13. StryderxX

    StryderxX [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,108
    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Intel i9-9900k - 4969 multi
     
  14. erek

    erek 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,336
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
  15. Jon855

    Jon855 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    8,012
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
  16. German Muscle

    German Muscle [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,770
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
  17. Skull_Angel

    Skull_Angel [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,468
    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    1632... Not horrible for her age.
     

    Attached Files:

  18. ThreeDee

    ThreeDee [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,591
    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2001
    Ryzen 2700X stock setup with 3200 ram @ 3400 3920

    ...meh
     
  19. M76

    M76 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,002
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    Just for kicks (all stock) :
    Celeron® G3900 : 142
    Core™2 Duo E7400 : 155
    Core™ i7-950 : 1014
    Xeon® W3690 : 1450
    Core™ i7-4770 : 1509
    Core™ i7-980X : 1543
    Xeon® E5-2670 : 2018
    Xeon® E5-1650 v3 : 2425
    Core™ i9-7900X : 5128

    Interesting that the 2008 C2D beats the 2015 Skylake Celeron.
     
  20. noko

    noko [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,099
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    4110 with Ryzen 2700 OC at 4100, system in sig. Almost a point per megahertz.

    I was hoping to see Pro-Render incorporated, would have been very interesting comparing CPUs and GPUs.
     
  21. sirmonkey1985

    sirmonkey1985 [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010

    Messages:
    21,098
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    lol was just wondering what my x4 940 that was running at 3.8Ghz would do, now i don't need to try it. :p


    my r5 1600 scored 2474 @ 3.4Ghz ddr4 3000. probably could get it higher if i actually bothered to close everything that was running in the background. that couch though is pretty much 90% of the runtime so they could of just simplified it and made it a render of the entire couch instead of the entire room.
     
    CAD4466HK likes this.
  22. arnemetis

    arnemetis 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,481
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    It's too bad the default test doesn't include single thread, that's the score I'm most interested in. The vast majority of my work is waiting on a single threaded activity to complete, and I was hoping to find something that stomps my score.
     
  23. odditory

    odditory [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,098
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    9900k @ 5.1 or 5.2 kills everything in single thread IPC.
     
  24. arnemetis

    arnemetis 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,481
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    By how much though? 550? 700, 1,000? Numbers man, give me the numbers!
     
  25. Algrim

    Algrim [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,380
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2016
    Under Preferences you can change how many threads you use to render. By default it will use your entire processor.
     
  26. arnemetis

    arnemetis 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,481
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Correct, and to add to this before the test click on file - advanced benchmark. This will do the multi, single, and mp ratio test.
     
  27. Wormfeeder

    Wormfeeder n00b

    Messages:
    12
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2018
    My score for Ryzen 2600X 16 GB 3200 mhz ram.
    I also noticed when I opened up task manager the process priority was set to below normal.
    I switched it to normal.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Mar 6, 2019
  28. CAD4466HK

    CAD4466HK [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,219
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz = 177 pts slower than your beast CPU in single core.


    CB20.jpg
     
    arnemetis likes this.
  29. arnemetis

    arnemetis 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,481
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Thanks I appreciate the feedback. It's funny, I went from an old 8350 to this chip, it was both impressive and a let down at the same time. Here's my gf's pc with Ryzen 2600 @ stock, 16gb of 3200mhz cl14 ram:
    Cinebench R20 2600 3200mhz cl14.png
     
  30. CAD4466HK

    CAD4466HK [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,219
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Yeah AMD has come a long way in a short amount time, vs. Intel who has just been sitting back twiddling their thumbs and milking us for 5-10% per year.
    Nice scores on her rig by the way.
     
  31. arnemetis

    arnemetis 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,481
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Decided to give the test a try without anything else running. Multi score went up 150 points, single only moved 1 point so within the margin of error. Screenshot for completeness:
    Cinebench R20 8700k 5.1 3200mhz cl14.png
     
  32. mat9v

    mat9v [H]Lite

    Messages:
    106
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005

    Attached Files:

  33. arnemetis

    arnemetis 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,481
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
  34. SmokeRngs

    SmokeRngs [H]ard|DCer of the Month - April 2008

    Messages:
    15,400
    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2001
    Fear the score of my beastly Q6600@3.6: 741.

    Bench.png

    I figured everyone could use a good laugh.
     
  35. Hallucinator

    Hallucinator Gawd

    Messages:
    562
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2006
    I don't know why Cinebench viewed two processor with 8 cores each as 8c/16t...

    1521.jpg
     
  36. mat9v

    mat9v [H]Lite

    Messages:
    106
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    True and yes :)
     
  37. jimbob200521

    jimbob200521 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    431
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    2528 with a Xeon E5-1650 V2 @ 4.4ghz. Just did a rough overclock on the new CPU last night so there's room for improvement.
     
  38. JosiahBradley

    JosiahBradley [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,712
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    2238 MT 462 ST 4790K at 4.8. Will try to push higher but I think I'm finally aging out with this CPU.