rpeters83
Gawd
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 513
I'll start off by saying I don't have a fancy setup. I'm amateur and run a small personal server (hyper-V with about 10-12 guests doing random things) on a PC I built myself. I'm also currently on CrashPlan Home one a guest VM, which is retiring, so I'm looking at other options. I'm looking for a different storage and back-up solution.
Currently, my network storage is basically about 3 large HDDs exposed onto the network for things like documents, photos, movies, music, etc. Total data is about 6-7 TB. I was also running a backup server that simply copies from these HDDs to other HDDs and backs that data up to the cloud. Not only is CrashPlan Home ending, but I'm noticing I'm getting low on space.
I'm torn between two approaches:
1. Ditch local storage and make it cloud-only backup - In an effort to make use of HDDs laying around, I could use what's currently HDDs for my backup server and make it network storage. Then, using, say CrashPlan Pro, simply back up ALL data to the cloud (documents, photos, music, movies, shows, etc). This totals 6-7 TB. My total cost would be $10 per month.
PROS: a) No new HDDs needed, b) data is stored off-site
CONS: a) Slow to restore data if there was a crash, b) initial backup will take a while
2. Ditch cloud storage and use local-only - I would purchase a couple more large HDDs and run all backups locally. Total cost would be several hundred bucks for large, decent HDDs.
PROS: a) quick to backup and restore, b) cloud storage may still be an eventual option as a second-level backup
CONS: a) May require additional physical server, as my current is running out of space for HDDs, b) no off-site in case of fire, c) high initial up-front cost
What are some thoughts on this? Again, I don't have any fancy NAS or RAID setups, and I'm not looking to reconfigure my entire setup (too much) if possible. Thanks.
Currently, my network storage is basically about 3 large HDDs exposed onto the network for things like documents, photos, movies, music, etc. Total data is about 6-7 TB. I was also running a backup server that simply copies from these HDDs to other HDDs and backs that data up to the cloud. Not only is CrashPlan Home ending, but I'm noticing I'm getting low on space.
I'm torn between two approaches:
1. Ditch local storage and make it cloud-only backup - In an effort to make use of HDDs laying around, I could use what's currently HDDs for my backup server and make it network storage. Then, using, say CrashPlan Pro, simply back up ALL data to the cloud (documents, photos, music, movies, shows, etc). This totals 6-7 TB. My total cost would be $10 per month.
PROS: a) No new HDDs needed, b) data is stored off-site
CONS: a) Slow to restore data if there was a crash, b) initial backup will take a while
2. Ditch cloud storage and use local-only - I would purchase a couple more large HDDs and run all backups locally. Total cost would be several hundred bucks for large, decent HDDs.
PROS: a) quick to backup and restore, b) cloud storage may still be an eventual option as a second-level backup
CONS: a) May require additional physical server, as my current is running out of space for HDDs, b) no off-site in case of fire, c) high initial up-front cost
What are some thoughts on this? Again, I don't have any fancy NAS or RAID setups, and I'm not looking to reconfigure my entire setup (too much) if possible. Thanks.