Namelessme
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2012
- Messages
- 1,161
I recently bought a used NEC 2190uxp on eBay, to replace my old broken one (which too was bought from eBay some time ago). I guess I should have learned, but this one also has issues. The seller stated 'short usage' in the auction, and when questioned, he stated it had about 6 months of use, but was on most of the time, so it had around 4200 hours on it. The constant use thing scared me a bit, but he assured me it had no dark spots or screen issues of any kind. He also has a 100% feedback rating.
Anyway, I get it all set up, and first thing I notice is how the backlight is rather dim for being set on 100%. The screen also has a yellow tint. I checked under hours used, and I see a little over 19,500 hours recorded with it 'on'.
I tried to set up a return to the buyer, who stated at first that there was no way the monitor had that many hours on it, since it was in storage. He also claimed previously that this monitor didn't support pulling up hour data, even after I gave him exact instructions how to do so -- guess I should have realized then what this guy was up to.
And when I showed him a photo of the screen w/hours listed, he offered no explanation besides: 'some may have been in use up to a year or so'. The math simply does not add up.
He wouldn't accept a full return (meaning what I paid + shipping) but instead offered the base pay only, leaving me to pay both return shipping and original shipping ... which would end up being around $90 at least, and I'd have nothing at all to show for it. I opened up a claim, stating it wasn't as described, and am just curious how I should proceed. He doesn't seem to be responding in the claim (at least so far) so should I just send messages backing my argument, and escalate it after 7 days? Or if he responds, should I just escalate immediately? I would also think a good seller should pay for return shipping, due to the mistake being on his part (although if he tried to scam me, he may not consider it a mistake).
And if anyone here, by some rare chance, just bought a NEC 2190uxp on eBay (base price was $100, or later he raised it to $150), check its hours used when you get it.
Anyway, I get it all set up, and first thing I notice is how the backlight is rather dim for being set on 100%. The screen also has a yellow tint. I checked under hours used, and I see a little over 19,500 hours recorded with it 'on'.
I tried to set up a return to the buyer, who stated at first that there was no way the monitor had that many hours on it, since it was in storage. He also claimed previously that this monitor didn't support pulling up hour data, even after I gave him exact instructions how to do so -- guess I should have realized then what this guy was up to.
And when I showed him a photo of the screen w/hours listed, he offered no explanation besides: 'some may have been in use up to a year or so'. The math simply does not add up.
He wouldn't accept a full return (meaning what I paid + shipping) but instead offered the base pay only, leaving me to pay both return shipping and original shipping ... which would end up being around $90 at least, and I'd have nothing at all to show for it. I opened up a claim, stating it wasn't as described, and am just curious how I should proceed. He doesn't seem to be responding in the claim (at least so far) so should I just send messages backing my argument, and escalate it after 7 days? Or if he responds, should I just escalate immediately? I would also think a good seller should pay for return shipping, due to the mistake being on his part (although if he tried to scam me, he may not consider it a mistake).
And if anyone here, by some rare chance, just bought a NEC 2190uxp on eBay (base price was $100, or later he raised it to $150), check its hours used when you get it.