Okay, so I currently have two Iomega StorCenter IX2-200 all formatted as iSCSI volumes.
Between them a total of 4 1TB SATA drives. They serve as the storage repositories for my XenServers.
Now, I would like to move these drives to a rack mount solution with a little more redundancy, but don't have a huge budget for this and I'm not really sure what to do. I thought about buying a normal server with some SATA bays on the front and using something like FreeNAS or open filer to do it, but I suppose it would be far simpler just to buy an existing storage solution.
Essentially I'm asking for ideas to fill this specification:
8-12 SATA 3.5" hot swap bays on the front (I'll be adding more drives later.)
2-4 Gigabit NIC's - 2 is good, 4 would be preferable.
Redundant power supplies - This is a must, it will be my only storage array for the servers and it's a real pain when they go offline.
Rackmount - 2-3U
All storage presentable as iSCSI
Preferable, although not required would be the ability to expand arrays live by adding more disks...
So, what do people think, I'm open to different ideas about how to go about this too.
Between them a total of 4 1TB SATA drives. They serve as the storage repositories for my XenServers.
Now, I would like to move these drives to a rack mount solution with a little more redundancy, but don't have a huge budget for this and I'm not really sure what to do. I thought about buying a normal server with some SATA bays on the front and using something like FreeNAS or open filer to do it, but I suppose it would be far simpler just to buy an existing storage solution.
Essentially I'm asking for ideas to fill this specification:
8-12 SATA 3.5" hot swap bays on the front (I'll be adding more drives later.)
2-4 Gigabit NIC's - 2 is good, 4 would be preferable.
Redundant power supplies - This is a must, it will be my only storage array for the servers and it's a real pain when they go offline.
Rackmount - 2-3U
All storage presentable as iSCSI
Preferable, although not required would be the ability to expand arrays live by adding more disks...
So, what do people think, I'm open to different ideas about how to go about this too.