Boeing Will Pay You $2 Million to Build a Functional Jetpack

Megalith

24-bit/48kHz
Staff member
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
13,003
Remember when you were a child and wanted to fly? Boeing is going to make that dream a reality – by making someone else do the work. The company has set up a $2,000,000 challenge for the creation of a personal flying device that is safe, useful, and thrilling. How about this?

Today we look to the sky and say “that plane is flying.” We challenge you to create a device where we look to the sky and say, “that person is flying.” The device is for a single person, but what it looks like or how it works is up to you. We welcome revolutionary design, and while all devices must be able to fly a person, you have the option to use a mannequin to simulate the user and can operate the device as a remotely piloted or autonomous UAV. The device should function safely in both crowded cities and rural areas.
 

Romale23

Gawd
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
866
Only$ 2 million? If someone is able to make something that fits that bill they could probably make a hell of a lot more than $2 million.
You get to keep everything but limited media rights (so they can use it in their media)
 

Paladin21

Gawd
Joined
Jun 22, 2004
Messages
529
Ah, I see from looking at it that it isn't just Boeing. They're the main sponsor, so they get top billing. This is basically an X-Prize for a jetpack instead of rockets. They're hoping to spur people on to build cool stuff that might help everyone out, not outsourcing product development (though I assume they'd probably be happy to buy up any developed IP that was actually practical).
 

Ur_Mom

Fully [H]
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
20,647
Ah, I see from looking at it that it isn't just Boeing. They're the main sponsor, so they get top billing. This is basically an X-Prize for a jetpack instead of rockets. They're hoping to spur people on to build cool stuff that might help everyone out, not outsourcing product development (though I assume they'd probably be happy to buy up any developed IP that was actually practical).

That sounds better. Get people to develop it, not to develop it for Boeing.

Of course, if you worked for Boeing, I assume you'd just get your normal wages and not the additional 2 mill. :)

This would be cool, but can you imagine the regulations that go with it? We have a bad enough time with quad-copters. People will abuse the shit out of them first thing out the door.
 

Riouken

Limp Gawd
Joined
Aug 28, 2015
Messages
210
This is stupid, there is a company already with one, they are supposed to be selling them by 2020, you can already hire them to do special projects.

http://www.jetpackaviation.com/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_pack#Bell_Jet_Flying_Belt:_wingless

Versions other than the one everyone thinks of from 007. Ie... one that flies longer than 20 seconds have been around since the 60s. But the problem is the same reason the military quit developing them, and why most of the demos you see today are over water. They are super dangerous. If you have an engine failure(Or critical malfunction) over land you are likely going to die.
 

Paladin21

Gawd
Joined
Jun 22, 2004
Messages
529
I wonder if homeowners insurance covers roof damage from drunk people with jetpacks crashing? Is it more like hail or an act of god? Lol. I can only imagine how many people would end up getting killed by something like that. Testosterone-induced teen accidents in cars are one thing, crashes from these things could be much, much worse to name one example.
 

Romale23

Gawd
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
866
I wonder if homeowners insurance covers roof damage from drunk people with jetpacks crashing? Is it more like hail or an act of god? Lol. I can only imagine how many people would end up getting killed by something like that. Testosterone-induced teen accidents in cars are one thing, crashes from these things could be much, much worse to name one example.
Mine would but i can't speak for everyone.
 

oldmanbal

2[H]4U
Joined
Aug 27, 2010
Messages
2,613
The only way it would be safe is if gravity were to be taken out of the equation.
 

Spidey329

[H]F Junkie
Joined
Dec 15, 2003
Messages
8,683
Only$ 2 million? If someone is able to make something that fits that bill they could probably make a hell of a lot more than $2 million.

That's the point. I see a lot of these engineering challenge competition's now. Large companies put up a big reward for the winner, but they get the design rights to all entries (in the fine print, usually). The potential patent rights alone are worth more than $2mil. They do this because it's far cheaper to get outside-the-box thinkers to do the work for you than it is to try and get your own R&D team behind a project where many of your in-house engineers won't be as passionate about it.

It's even done in the ML/QuantA space. The people entering don't realize they're possibly selling a $100mil invention for pennies on the dollar.
 

nightfly

2[H]4U
Joined
Jun 7, 2011
Messages
3,567
Acme's way ahead of them....

catalog.jpg


attachment.php
 

Zarathustra[H]

Extremely [H]
Joined
Oct 29, 2000
Messages
36,097
I am envisioning total nutjobs strapping themselves to rockets and dying in spectacular fashion in pursuit of this prize :p
 
D

Deleted member 245375

Guest
Next up: pharmaceutical companies start offering big huge lumps of cash for anyone that can create a new Viagra-like drug..." and so on and so forth.

We should just refer to such offers from big companies and firms as "The Darwin Scholarships" because that's for damned sure what it'll turn out to be, seriously. :D
 

cbutters

Gawd
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
514
I kinda want to say that this is a bit of a farce.... I don't think you can create a safe personal flying device for use in crowded areas around the general public... too many variables to cover. Want to use blades to fly? You are going to chop off someones head, not to mention Flying takes planning, competency and running out of fuel in the air is inherently risky, not to mention just maneuvering in wind / adverse conditions. Personal flying devices simply not going to happen without some breakthrough in "antigravity" which physics hasn't discovered yet. (unlikely).

The best bet is perhaps if battery power density improves to a point where you could create basically a drone for carrying a human with meshed and padded rotary blades.... even then... running out of juice mid flight is essentially a death sentence.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
10
Like others have stated, I don’t really understand how this contest can exist when many such devices are already in development. Check out Richard Browning’s Jet Suit if you want to see one that is very close to release. I watched a video yesterday about how he is adding an in-air deployable wing system that will enable his suit to take someone to parachute height – currently his suit just allows a few feet of flight off the ground. Pretty cool stuff, you can see his website here: www.gravity.co
 

danmoody

Limp Gawd
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
330
Great crotch rockets for the air. Then we will see them splitting the run ways "cuz they can fit." Don't be mad at the jet packers cuz your big plane can't fit bro! STOP READING THIS POST AND LOOK OUT FOR MOTORCYCLES !!!!!
 

sfsuphysics

[H]F Junkie
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
15,607
Like others have stated, I don’t really understand how this contest can exist when many such devices are already in development. Check out Richard Browning’s Jet Suit if you want to see one that is very close to release. I watched a video yesterday about how he is adding an in-air deployable wing system that will enable his suit to take someone to parachute height – currently his suit just allows a few feet of flight off the ground. Pretty cool stuff, you can see his website here: www.gravity.co
What's the range on some of these? Looking at the guidelines it seems like it needs to start with design phase type stuff, so many bigger companies might not want to hand that stuff over. But looks like they're looking for 20 miles of flight, 20 minutes of flight with 10 minutes of reserve fuel, has to fly faster than 30 knots, and be quieter than 87dB @ 50 feet. Not sure where the state of the art is now, but that one that flies during Super Bowls/Olympics/etc, sure as hell doesn't have that kind of endurance.
 

noko

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
7,074
I remember back at Disneyland in California (60's here) jetpacks in tomorrow land being flown. Yes they were limited to less than 30 sec but it always seemed much longer than that. As a kid it was one of the coolest things to watch and to dream about.

I would be thinking a jet pack combined with a glider type concept, get the velocity up so you have uplift and extend distance and add some safety to the whole system.
 

M76

[H]F Junkie
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
13,309
I'll give 2 million if someone can build a functioning wormhole to another habitable planet.
 

DPI

[H]F Junkie
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Messages
12,617
One of the biggest beneficiaries of the mil-industrial complex can't engineer their own jetpack? Jesus Christ.
 

Youn

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
5,965
Not surprising... imagine the legal department, red tape, endless meetings, etc... too many chefs in a kitchen, let some other poor folk foot their own funeral bills... boing just wants the final design documents for a measly 2mil...
 

_l_

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Nov 27, 2016
Messages
1,151
Yea! Jetpacks. James Bond and all of that stuff but ... I don't trust how most people drive; no way I'll trust them when it comes to flying and especially not with a jetpack. I can see it now, a 90 year old person zooming through the skies ... yea, real smart. Might be an effective way to reduce the population though. I'm thinking this Boeing contest is ment to spur interest in aerospace careers, not create grandma and grandpa missile projectiles
 
Top