![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
nice, beat me to it!
lol guess we'll see, maybe, since the "articles" are simply someones ramblings and rumors.
If they go after their cloud server chip supply... hopefully that means they are going to be going hard on performance. The consumer side is a big question mark of course.... I can see MS going after Intel (x86) replacement. With Apple doing what they are doing... and likely picking up a good bit of market share. MS has no real worries in regards to any anti trust stuff. If MS had tried to make their own CPUs 20 years ago they would have ended up in court and risked being broken up. Now.... especially if Apple manages to show 20% market share by the time MS gets this ready for prime time. Clear sailing. Pretty sure MS has the legal go ahead to compete with Intel just like AMD does as a fabless CPU manufacturer.
sad
I bought into Windows phone. Lost much respect for how quickly they dropped it. I wish people would give me millions of dollars to make dumbass arbitrary decisions.
A dark cyberpunk future, indeed...
I would certainly seem like every megacorp is done with Intel's bumbling and repeated failures at this point, and really, who could blame them.
Well, at that point they didn't have enough "+" on 14nm.
Yep. They are training the masses with all these subscription services. The end game is that everyone has a dumb terminate they use to login to the cloud. You only get access to what ever you pay for. Do you want internet? $4.99 month please. You want to use so and so software? $4.99 a month please. You want to play the latest AAA game? $100 for the game plus $4.99 to $99.99 based on the performance level you want. That is the future.
Minicomputers?Up next, the world moves back to dumb terminals and time-sharing on mainframes, plus the return of the minicomputer! (links provided for those not over the age of 70)
Really between virtualization, web apps, Citrix, and RDP thin clients we arrived there years ago. It is far easier to secure a single server and have it accessed only through secured protocols while the user side has no access directly to sensitive data. Set them to wipe themselves on log off or reboot and give the local user 0 administrative functions and you have greatly decreased your attack surface. I have a sneaking suspicion that secure infrastructure is going to be a much more important and front facing issue in 2021.History repeats itself.
Up next, the world moves back to dumb terminals and time-sharing on mainframes, plus the return of the minicomputer! (links provided for those not over the age of 70)
For our 2021 hardware refresh for the first time in a decade Apple is back on the table for fleet wide. We are now down to one piece of software that isn’t Mac native or already a web app but now works flawlessly in Citrix. For the 8 users who need it getting this spun up is a no brainer.
Yes but in many cases it ends up being cheaper than flat out buying the software more than not if you were one of the users who kept updated. But gone are the days of buying a single copy and using it for a decade and change.
That's the rub, over 5 years a $600 laptop costs significantly more than a $1,100 mac. By the time I have Win 10 Enterprise, my AV license, MDM license, that $600 dell is now closer to $800. But now work in the management costs associated with most win10 devices, update and patch management mostly and the annual costs of said MDM and AV and software alone brings them to parity on costs. But over that 5-year span, I will not see a Mac user, I will not deal with how an intel update broke the wireless, I won't be dealing with a broken Ricoh driver update killed printing to tray 3 again, and so on and so on. And the big one right now is Mac's screens look great in crap fluorescent lighting where I have a crapload of users complaining about eye strain and headaches from their screens. They get them at a far higher rate than the Apple users, the HR issues alone would make most happy if we could bring that down.
Ensuring that folks can continue to run their apps on everything from phones to laptops, and reducing the dependence on a specific architecture.
I suppose that management isn't considering upgrading the lighting, either.
We have we’re going all LED, but it’s going to take like 5 years to bang out all sites. Replacing that many ballasts is expensive and the disposal of that many bulbs and we have so many spares they are trying to schedule upgrades as the supply dwindles. So when it’s all done we don’t have too many extras that are going with them. But by the time they are all done we will be looking at putting out bids for our next refresh in 2026 I suspect screen tech and our operating environment will be drastically different by then so it likely will no longer be an issue.
I sold computers for a living 20 some years back. $699 for a computer would have been basically impossible. Everything is relative.
This is in CDN funds but any laptop $600 or less is basically a Chromebook with windows and maybe an i3 not a Celeron. $600-900 and you are into your base line machines where minor features are going to be different but they are all basically the same. $900+ is where things start to get interesting and the special features can start to show you see nicer screens, GPU’s battery life they are going to start diverging and actually offering something different. The Apple 13” M1 based MacBooks don’t really have an equal here at that price point. There are things that offers different features, maybe more Ram and CPU but a cheaper screen, large HDD and GPU but shite battery and variations there but you get into a lot of subjectives into this range and people can start picking what they want and need and can start shopping towards priorities rather than generalities. Apple has thrown a serious punch and Microsoft has taken notice, Dell, HP, and Lenovo are all scrambling I will not be surprised if come May, Intel announces steep discounts on their lower power i3 and i5 variants to allow them to offer something that can be competitive in the price/aesthetics market of the 13” ultrabook.I sold computers for a living 20 some years back. $699 for a computer would have been basically impossible. Everything is relative.
But yes Apple isn't going after the ele cheapo..... However the ele cheapo category is still not a Intel/AMD lock.
As I see it for anyone in the market for a sub $500 machine.... a chromebook is probably the best option. With a high to medium range smartphone being the second best option. The shit box emachine type desktop is a distant who cares... and a cheap windows laptop is an option today but really every year the cheap windows laptops look crappier and crappier vs the chromebook options.
Once you hit the mid range price range right now... hell ya Apples M1 powered AIR and pro laptops are probably the best DEAL in the market. Best battery life, one of the best bang for the bucks on the screen.... and a OS that makes very good use of a small amount of RAM. The M1 powered stuff is frankly probably best in class bang for the buck. Which seems crazy but also seems pretty much the way it is.
If Apple releases a M1+ or M2 to power higher end notebooks and mid range desktop imac options. Then we end up at a place where imo it gets really hard to recommend windows for much other then gaming. Even the arguments of X or Y piece of windows software requires me to run windows is going to evaporate over the next year or two. Now that Apple has both exciting hardware, and most importantly market share (its going up and M1... and its follow up big brothers are going to drive Apples share up faster then MS is comfortable with for sure) software developers that may not have been supporting MacOS are going to. (and imo everything major is already on MacOS anyway)
It does feel like MS may be too late.... I think if they where smart. They would mend their fences with Nvidia. Ya I hate Nvidia as much as the next Nvidia hater... but if they are going to end up being ARM. It is probably in Microsofts interest to get them to design a proper Apple chip competitor that can excite consumers. If the dangle their cloud service contract in front of Nvidia they may even get a decent deal. Nvidia could easily build ARM/Ampere chips for MS cloud... and a ARM/Ampere/AI SOC for their consumer devices. Who else can bring a windows friendly version of the Apple chips other then them. Perhaps AMD.... but AMD if where being honest has little incentive to kill x86 now that they are the champs for today and probably the next few years. Nvidia is motivated to become the Windows ARM consumer and server supplier.
Ya the Dell 13 inchers have been very popular. I also love that you can get them with Ubuntu out of the box. However Apple is basically destroying them in value right now.... value, Apple. Implausible but true. lol
still using an acer jade primo with 10 on it. was sad they killed it(win phn) two weeks after i bought it....
If there is a good x86-64 emulator and the performance is good, it could succeed at that.
I'd argue AMD and Intel drove the cloud companies to ARM. This hurts both of them. Guess we'll see how both companies handle the loss of lots of server deals in the future. The most diversified will win if x86 starts to die off.
Ya Intel is in serious trouble on the server front. There not the only x86 option, AMD has been eating into that market as well. Intel still has some advantages in software stack optimization... Intel has some great software support on the Linux side. AMD needs to step that up if there going to steal the real juicy customers. But ya AMD and Intel are both going to be dealing with serious ARM competition going forward. Its not just MS, it seems everyone has a ARM server play. With ARM cloud servers starting to get used more and more the software side is flushing out pretty quickly. I think its probably some years before x86 is pushed completely out of the server market.... ARM is gaining market share fast though in those markets, I think it isn't crazy to think in a few years that market could easily be 50/50. At that point if ARM keeps gaining its just a matter of how long x86 hangs on at all really.
This has been an upcoming problem for a while and I'm sure both AMD and Intel have something in the works. The problem is that for most stuff out there ARM is "fast enough", and large core counts and power efficiency are starting to be a much higher priority. ARM now has enough market penetration that the software exists and there are communities and companies investing more and more into it. This isn't a problem that is going away for either AMD or Intel and I have a hard time believing that they are short-sighted enough to not realize this.