The game just feels janky and cheap. Not necessarily bad, just not well put together...
it looks like a game made by a small studio...a bigger studio might have polished up the rough edges
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The game just feels janky and cheap. Not necessarily bad, just not well put together...
I installed this, still want to give it a try despite middling/low reviews. It looks interesting enough to give a shot.
I installed this, still want to give it a try despite middling/low reviews. It looks interesting enough to give a shot.
I, honestly, think it’s good. If it had Nintendo’s name on it, people would be declaring it game of the century and lauding about how great the narrator is. I think a lot of the negativity = people parroting reviews without having actually played it. Or they just watched a 5-minute bug compilation video with “rant” in the title and think they know everything about it. It’s not an A+, but it’s a solid B.
I haven't read a single review, I played the game, it's mediocre at best, I wouldn't give a shit if Nintendo's name was on it or not. Nintendo's only made half a dozen good games in the last decade so they aren't much to talk about either. Tell yourself whatever you need to so you don't feel dumb for blowing $60 on a $30 game but don't pretend you're some enlightened gamer who's able to see something no one else can and everyone else is somehow just following the crowd because that's far from the case. Sometimes, when a lot of people says a game is shit it's because it's shit. Sorry you spent $60 on mediocre shit.I, honestly, think it’s good. If it had Nintendo’s name on it, people would be declaring it game of the century and lauding about how great the narrator is. I think a lot of the negativity = people parroting reviews without having actually played it. Or they just watched a 5-minute bug compilation video with “rant” in the title and think they know everything about it. It’s not an A+, but it’s a solid B.
I haven't read a single review, I played the game, it's mediocre at best, I wouldn't give a shit if Nintendo's name was on it or not. Nintendo's only made half a dozen good games in the last decade so they aren't much to talk about either. Tell yourself whatever you need to so you don't feel dumb for blowing $60 on a $30 game but don't pretend you're some enlightened gamer who's able to see something no one else can and everyone else is somehow just following the crowd because that's far from the case. Sometimes, when a lot of people says a game is shit it's because it's shit. Sorry you spent $60 on mediocre shit.
don't pretend you're some enlightened gamer who's able to see something no one else can and everyone else is somehow just following the crowd because that's far from the case. Sometimes, when a lot of people says a game is shit it's because it's shit. Sorry you spent $60 on mediocre shit.
I've read that there's no "weight" to anything twice in this thread. What does that even mean? Does Assassins' Creed have "weight" to things? Did Fallout, GTA, or BoTW? Are you expecting hyper realistic physics or Dark Souls slow weapons something? You're a cartoon raccoon cat swinging swords and firing guns at enemies in the exact same way that basically every other game does. You can be hit out of combos if you just stand there mashing if that's the issue. Just like in Ninja Gaiden and such. If anything, the combo system in the game offers more depth than most other similar games. The games most often compared to it are Fallout, Assassin's Creed, and Breath of the Wild. I'd say Amalur is a very fair comparison. What type of similar game would you say is better? What games have the weight this one is missing? The Witcher?
on sale for $29.99 on Steam until December 6th...