horrorshow
Lakewood Original
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2007
- Messages
- 9,438
2000: Sacrifice looked far superior to Giants.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Loved Sacrifice, i actually have it on my machine right now, lol. I do remember Giants did have really good lighting that i recall seemed to pop. But Sacrifice was artistically better. I had to look, i thought Giants came out a year after Sacrifice, but came out within like a month. Those were good times. So many good games...what about Rune, best multiplayer ever. \m/,2000: Sacrifice looked far superior to Giants.
Those were good times. So many good games...what about Rune, best multiplayer ever. \m/,
I never had the privilege, I was too busy getting laid, making money, and banging to play MP anything.
But I heard great things.
2004: Far Cry
or
Half Life 2
Is there a server-base still alive?
I watch Vikings all the time and enjoy Chivalry.....
Ya I think 04 was probably the biggest jump technically, though that pic of doom 3 looks like it's using a graphics mod.We absolutely cannot forget Doom 3.
2004 was a big year to say the least.
That screenshot looks like it's the BFG Edition, which in my opinion actually looks worse than the original.Couldn't say. I've been too busy too busy getting laid, making money, and banging to try.
Ya I think 04 was probably the biggest jump technically, though that pic of doom 3 looks like it's using a graphics mod.
GOG has Rune and it is great been playing it again latelyAgreed, MP arena was awesome in this game! Still have my disk to this game but I hope GOG gets it soon.
doom 3 was pretty terrible actually it was all "smoke and mirrors". it was pretty much all clever lighting. when the lighting was removed it was ugly. low poly textures, poor geometry, it was light years behind far cry, and even half life 2.
Doom 3 is vastly overated imo.Half life 2 had far more realistic look then doom 3 did imo, Better detailed environments and physics. Far cry had indoor environments on par with doom 3 as well outdoor environments and view distance doom failed to do.
For 2016 so far uncharted looks far better then the new doom, not even close really.
doom 3 was pretty terrible actually it was all "smoke and mirrors". it was pretty much all clever lighting. when the lighting was removed it was ugly. low poly textures, poor geometry, it was light years behind far cry, and even half life 2.
you need to replay all three games because your memory is evidently quite poor.Doom 3 is vastly overated imo.Half life 2 had far more realistic look then doom 3 did imo, Better detailed environments and physics. Far cry had indoor environments on par with doom 3 as well outdoor environments and view distance doom failed to do.
For 2016 so far uncharted looks far better then the new doom, not even close really.
2016 has some pretty awesome graphics - I'm waiting for them to fully utilize environment destructibility though. Seems like a fading gimmick at this point
Must be hard to do, as its always been a big wish, and Crysis wow'ed people with it the first time, where you could mow down trees.2016 has some pretty awesome graphics - I'm waiting for them to fully utilize environment destructibility though. Seems like a fading gimmick at this point