Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You started with "Someone at Best Buy told me" which means it's bullshit.
No joking, I'm 100% serious, I overheard a salesman at best buy talking to a couple looking at desktop computers and they mentioned they had just moved into town from out of state. He said, and I quote "Oh, so you guys are noobies to the area huh?"
[T5K]thrasher;1032029323 said:It could happen, last ditch effort to keep the format alive..
Especially since you can buy a new release dvd from wal-mart for 13$ and a BD or HD-DVD is what, 35-40?
[T5K]thrasher;1032030483 said:DVDs really need to drop to the $10 and under range to make room for HD disks in the $20 range.. Should happen eventually.
While I do think the death of HD-DVD is highly exaggerated, I don't think MS will--or should--ever put the drive into the box directly. That would be stupid on several epic levels, really. DVD is an industry standard--neither Bluray nor HD-DVD are (or appear likely to ever be) industry standards. It's true that BD is outselling HD-DVD, but it's equally true that BD isn't selling for shit.
DVD remains the king of the hill, with no end in sight.
Since hddvd is dead as a movie format, the only reason ms would ever consider this would be to give developers a disk format with more space...but they're already proven with their insistence on not requiring a harddrive that they are in no way willing to fragment their user base.
Microsoft needs to lower the 360 price point as soon as the "final blow" is dealt to HD-DVD. You just aren't getting your money's worth on the system.
OP - There are probably 7 people working at Best Buy at any given time who know what they are talking about, they're hard to find, because they're usually getting yelled at by a manager in a corner somewhere for not using deceitful sales tactics to attach gold plated cables to $25 dvd players, or sell you a $100 monster HDMI cable for your PS3. (The oxygen free copper wrapped in silver foil helps keeps the 1's and 0's inside the shielding!)
so discount just anything you haven't read on Joystiq or Engadget as a rule, when it comes to new hardware info.
Really? Wild guess: you aren't a 360 owner? I'm pretty sure the "Dollars/Hours Used" ratio on my 360 spans 5 decimal places due to the amount of use I've put into it gaming since 2005.
Meanwhile, Netflix just came in the mail, so I guess I'll fire up the PS3 and watch Blood Diamond on Blu Ray... then turn it off again while I wait for the next one.
HD Adoption has been far faster than it was for DVDs did when they first came out. Their market penetration is far beyond what DVDs was in its first 2 years on the scene. Its actually easier to upgrade to blu-ray as a standard than it was to upgrade from VHS to DVD as a standard for the everyday consumer. Will it ever become standard? That remains to be seen, but i dont dismiss the possibility as quickly as you.
And lol@dead of hddvd being exaggerated. Check the latest defectors across the globe. Its one after another. Sales last 3 weeks. 87/13 BD, 83/17 BD 82/18 BD. Shelf space being cleaned out everywhere, etc etc.
But not to totally hijack the thread on this. MS was rumored to have been announcing a future model with HDDVD at CES, but when Warner broke the news of going Blu-Ray only they allegedly pulled that announcement. Whether its true or not we will never know.
The bottom line remains the same, though: the majority of the market isn't moving to either format, they are sticking with DVD. And for good reason: HD, as a movie format, is virtually worthless. In most cases the difference from DVD to Bluray or HDDVD is marginal at best. In some special effects laden movies it's nice, but in the end, a shitty movie where you can see the pimples on the cardboard actor's ass is just as shitty as it was when you couldn't see said zits. HD does NOT make movies better, it just makes them more expensive.
HD makes far more sense for *games* than for movies. Frankly, I fully expect PS3 and 360 to both continue doing well. 360 sales haven't slowed at all, PS3 is still trailing a distant third. I do expect the two to get closer in sales as the generation drags on, and battle it out for second, but neither is going to see first place any time soon.
Anyway, BD and HD-DVD are both *marginal* improvements on the dvd format, and neither warrant the price of entry IMHO. When we see an HD format that can be used without bulky disk media and ideally without the need for spinning any sort of disk, then we'll have a revolution on our hands. Until then all we have is "more of the same with a wax job".
If MS came out with the HD-DVD built in 360, it would probably cost an arm and a leg.
For some strange reason i see this "death" of HD-DVD as a huge blow to the 360, and might eventually be a cause (long-term, of course) of it "losing" to the Ps3..
I just feel like the amount of people who will upgrade to HD TV's and still use their Ps2's will go for something more practical, like the Ps3, opposed to a 360 without HD movie playback.
The bottom line remains the same, though: the majority of the market isn't moving to either format, they are sticking with DVD. And for good reason: HD, as a movie format, is virtually worthless. In most cases the difference from DVD to Bluray or HDDVD is marginal at best. In some special effects laden movies it's nice, but in the end, a shitty movie where you can see the pimples on the cardboard actor's ass is just as shitty as it was when you couldn't see said zits. HD does NOT make movies better, it just makes them more expensive.
HD makes far more sense for *games* than for movies. Frankly, I fully expect PS3 and 360 to both continue doing well. 360 sales haven't slowed at all, PS3 is still trailing a distant third. I do expect the two to get closer in sales as the generation drags on, and battle it out for second, but neither is going to see first place any time soon.
Anyway, BD and HD-DVD are both *marginal* improvements on the dvd format, and neither warrant the price of entry IMHO. When we see an HD format that can be used without bulky disk media and ideally without the need for spinning any sort of disk, then we'll have a revolution on our hands. Until then all we have is "more of the same with a wax job".
i think MS will have to do some strategic thinking once blu-ray is officially the winner. Blu-Ray winning will definitely pump ps3 sales higher.
For the past 6 months I've had my 360 on about 1/50th as much as my PS3. Ive been purchasing all the cross platform titles on ps3 now as well since they run as good or better it seems, finally. The fact that it streams all my movies w/o having to boot into the 360 MCE and plays BDs and plays games makes it on the majority of the time at my house. I havent had my 360 on since mass effect actually.
EA has stated they forsee the ps3 outselling the 360 by 2008 year end. Granted thats a long ways off and just speculation, i think MS will have to do some strategic thinking once blu-ray is officially the winner. Blu-Ray winning will definitely pump ps3 sales higher.
I wouldn't listen to a BB employee. Awhile back I was looking at video cards. The BB employee came up and asked what does the 256 mean.
While I do think the death of HD-DVD is highly exaggerated, I don't think MS will--or should--ever put the drive into the box directly. That would be stupid on several epic levels, really. DVD is an industry standard--neither Bluray nor HD-DVD are (or appear likely to ever be) industry standards. It's true that BD is outselling HD-DVD, but it's equally true that BD isn't selling for shit.
DVD remains the king of the hill, with no end in sight.
Only because of the PS3. Standalone player sales have been a joke.adoption rate for HD has been waaaaaaaay higher than DVD. DVD took two years and the PS2 to really get going. HD is serioius already after a year, and now that Blu-ray is clearly on top, it is soaking up most of the continuing success of HD.