It would seem your statement here falls right in line with what I am trying to say.
You are correct, it is standard practice for a company to encrypt data on company phones. They also usually go with phones which, if lost or stolen, can be remotely wiped.
If a Court demands data from an employees phone the business would have to comply or face some real trouble. But if the company uses iPhone 6s for their business, all that data is encrypted and can only be accessed by the employee who used the phone. That means the company can't comply and by law, if it's too much trouble and unreasonable, they don't have to. To me, there is a problem with this.
My daughter had a stroke, her doctor sent her home, said it wasn't a stroke even though she had an episode right in front of him in the emergency room. The symptoms were undeniably stroke like, they did not perform an MRI because they don't have the expertise to interpret the data, they have it done by St. Joseph's in Tucson, 70 miles away. He didn't know what her problem was but he did have stroke symptoms and failed to take any action, including sending her to Tucson. It's been a year since and my kid is still fucked up from this stroke, can't work, can't drive. Now it's a malpractice case.
If the lawyers can show that the doctor discounted her as a stroke victim because of her young age, my kid will win a settlement. If this guy was texting a superior and evidence of this is on his phone or in his stored data, my kid should win.
I am glad this happened over a year ago and maybe he didn't have a iPhone 6 and the latest OS yet.
Now you should be able to see where I am coming from.
I do, but I'm not sure what the solution is. I'm not an attorney, so I don't know what you can compel a person to turn over. I really don't think there's any way you can force an individual (and ultimately, the DR in this scenario is being sued) to incriminate themselves and any avenue that Apple can take is ultimately a back door or a weakness that can be exploited.
However, if you're just suing the hospital, then maybe the law is different (hell maybe I'm wrong on both accounts)