Apple: You Can't Sue Us for Slowing Down Your iPhones Because We're "Contractors"

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by Megalith, Feb 3, 2019.

  1. Megalith

    Megalith 24-bit/48kHz Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,004
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Apple is in the process of defending itself from a class-action lawsuit alleging they intentionally slowed down processors with an iOS update, but desperation appears to be growing based on their legal team’s newest defense on why they shouldn’t have to pay up. In what is described as a “bizarre” argument, lawyers say Apple is essentially a building contractor: a typical job (iPhone) may involve excessive destruction (degraded hardware), but initial consent (user agreeing to updates) pardons the contractor from such liabilities.

    Apple is like a building contractor you hire to redo your kitchen, the tech giant has argued in an attempt to explain why it shouldn't have to pay customers for slowing down their iPhones. Addressing a bunch of people trying to sue it for damages, the iGiant's lawyers told a California court this month: "Plaintiffs are like homeowners who have let a building contractor into their homes to upgrade their kitchens, thus giving permission for the contractor to demolish and change parts of the houses." They went on: "Any claim that the contractor caused excessive damage in the process sounds in contract, not trespass."
     
    Wrecked Em and captaindiptoad like this.
  2. Tsumi

    Tsumi [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    12,981
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2010
    Words cannot describe the absurdity of this argument.
     
    glutto, Skull_Angel, travanx and 33 others like this.
  3. bigdogchris

    bigdogchris [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    17,823
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    The difference is, Apple, that in the real world you can choose your contractor.

    Their analogy is better described as if you buy a house from us you can only have us handle repairs, and if we damage your kitchen during the repair, oh well.
     
    travanx, Revdarian, Flatline and 13 others like this.
  4. p.i.m.p

    p.i.m.p Gawd

    Messages:
    583
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
  5. Chris_B

    Chris_B [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,997
    Joined:
    May 29, 2001
    What a load of shite.
     
  6. Snowdensjacket

    Snowdensjacket Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    316
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2017
    Uber and lyft avoid the laws with this independent contractor stuff. So does Amazon. You guys love to cheer for those billionaires avoiding the law with this crap. This is just the next step in "they are independent contractor". You guys should be cheering this on.

    I mean if you are not smart enough to read all of your TOS agreements before Apple ruins your phone that's on you as an individual. Don't like it don't buy the phone. Nobody is forcing you to buy the phone.
     
  7. gxp500

    gxp500 Gawd

    Messages:
    867
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2015
    You gotta give some props for their creativity though, shows you the length companies will go to win in court.
     
    AceGoober likes this.
  8. LurkerLito

    LurkerLito 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,115
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2007
    They should just use the same argument against Apple. "I hired them to repair the windows so that no unauthorized people could break into my house, I did not give them permission to make it so I had to wait 5 minutes anytime I wanted to open the doors to enter or exit rooms." If a contractor did that I'd be suing them because they weren't suppose to touch the doors inside my house.
     
  9. Darth Ender

    Darth Ender Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    130
    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2018
    I'll sit back and laugh. Apple users should expect to be getting screwed. They bought an apple product.
     
  10. mope54

    mope54 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,427
    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    It's really unfortunate when people don't bother to read the thing they're gearing themselves to be so upset about...then we'll hear about all these inaccurate conclusions for the next twenty years every time Apple releases a new device :\

    The claim is that Apple "trespassed" by installing this update on users' devices.
    Apple's response is that the update can't be installed without user consent so this is just like any other contract dispute--it's just a regular dispute not a criminal one.
     
    ChoGGi, Armenius and GoldenTiger like this.
  11. PhaseNoise

    PhaseNoise [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,450
    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    I think they show Courage in removing features and speed.
     
    Wrecked Em and Armenius like this.
  12. 1Nocturnal101

    1Nocturnal101 Gawd

    Messages:
    521
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2015
    ....uhhhgggg Why do asshats continually defend a company like this?
     
  13. mope54

    mope54 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,427
    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Really? So you agree with the plaintiff's argument that installing OS updates OTA is trespassing and unauthorized access to computers?

    Apple is saying if a contractor breaks all your stuff while doing something they're contracted to work on, they get sued for the damages instead of being hauled into jail for criminal trespass. That's an absurd argument to you?
     
  14. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    27,710
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    This argument is absurd, but really shouldn't be necessary.

    They made a judgment call. They power throttled devices once their batteries were no longer able to keep up with the load, under the assumption that if users were forced to choose, they would prefer slower operation over random shutdowns and reboots. I think this assumption was correct.

    And they were proven right, that it wasn't an attempt to sabotage older phones, because voila, when the battery was replaced, the phones functioned at full speed again.

    Sure, they should have made it an option you can turn off if you want to, but in the grand scheme of things, this is a non issue.

    I hate Apple, but I feel like in this case they made a good design decision in the interest of providing the best user experience, and conspiracy theorists are just freaking out over it for no reason.
     
    Fleat, Megaslug, xmadror and 3 others like this.
  15. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    27,710
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    Both arguments are stupid.
     
  16. Azrak

    Azrak Gawd

    Messages:
    751
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2015
    You're contracting it wrong.
     
    Darrell262 and mynamehere like this.
  17. mope54

    mope54 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,427
    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    No, Apple's argument isn't stupid.

    If you hire someone to work on your house and they break your door in the process, you have to sue them for the damages they caused. You can't claim they trespassed into your house to break the door. The same argument can be had over a mechanic who breaks the hood lever while changing your oil--he didn't trespass just because you didn't like what he did; you allowed him to be there in the first place.

    Users allow Apple to install OS updates OTA. If something breaks in the process, they have to sue for those damages and not for trespassing onto your phone. That's really the only argument against the absurd claim that Apple is trespassing on people's devices with OTA updates.

    They aren't saying they shouldn't be sued at all because of that, they are saying they can only be sued for damage related to the updates. They then go on to argue there are no damages claimed so they shouldn't be sued, but that's a completely separate claim they are raising.
     
  18. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    27,710
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    I for one would like to see phone and operating system makers build in real kill switches in their devices and software.

    As soon as an Operating System or Device no longer receives regular security updates, it is prevented from reaching the network.

    No one should be using an old device or operating system that is no longer patched. No one.
     
  19. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    27,710
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    Look, it's the argument they had to make make in response to a stupid complaint, but that doesn't make it any less stupid that this is the discourse that is being had on this subject.
     
  20. Axehandler

    Axehandler Gawd

    Messages:
    634
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2007
    Just curious... if you hired a contractor to do work. and they install camera's in your home or new locks (without consent/part of the contract) was that trespass?
     
  21. Skillz

    Skillz [H]ard DCOTY 2017

    Messages:
    21,709
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2004
    They should allow the user to put whatever they want on the hardware since they bought it.
     
    Paul_Johnson and SvenBent like this.
  22. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    27,710
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    I would like this as well, I think locked bootloaders should be illegal.

    That said, any OS placed on the device should either provide regular security updates or disable itself. If it disables itself, flash another OS.
     
  23. cattix

    cattix n00b

    Messages:
    20
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2018
    Serves them right, I mean anybody who willingly gives money to Apple for inferior overpriced products should not be at all suprised by this. "You paid for it and now we are going to deliberately destroy YOUR property by slowing it down AND you are going to like it AND you are going to buy new cr*p from us so we can do it all again!". Yea, serves them right.

    Oh btw, their "argument" is pure undistilled steaming bs.
     
  24. zehoo

    zehoo Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    250
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2004
    It's more like the contractor comes in and changes the taps in the kitchen sink from high flow taps to "water saving" low flow taps without permission when all you had paid them for was to polish the taps.
     
  25. mope54

    mope54 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,427
    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Yeah, that's true. But would you sue that contractor for civil damages within a contract dispute or would you call the police and try to get them arrested for criminal trespass?
     
  26. Qthulu

    Qthulu [H]Lite

    Messages:
    103
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2018
    You don't sue a contractor for breaking your door. They either replace it for free or you file a claim against their insurance.
     
    SomeoneElse likes this.
  27. Tak Ne

    Tak Ne [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,233
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2008
    Sure they want to win but Apple has never minded losing in court. The one thing they do care about is that the settlement stipulates that Apple admits no wrongdoing. Its standard for any cult-like business.. papal infallibility etc.
     
    xmadror likes this.
  28. Derangel

    Derangel [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    17,325
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    I feel like Apple should have given users a choice, however I don't think really think them issuing the update was wrong either. The reality of lith-ion batteries is that they degrade and as that happens it has a huge effect on battery life. The update didn't "destroy" anything. In typical Apple fashion they chose the "we're always right and users shouldn't have more options" approach to the problem, but it was a problem that had to be dealt with. Mind you, having easily user replaceable batteries would have negated a lot of the need for this but well that's the nature of the current smartphone market.
     
  29. serious

    serious Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    226
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Owner: "You broke my kitchen!"
    Contractor: "Yeah, remember you let us in and upgrade your kitchen?"
    Owner: "When the F did I let you in? And WTF did you break?"
    Contractor: "You gave us the permission to come into your kitchen whenever we see fit the moment you purchased the kitchen, and we won't tell you what we have upgraded."
    Owner: "You mean demolish?"
    Contractor: "Upgraded."

    P.S.:
    I like how allowing a contractor to work in the kitchen means giving permission for the contractor to demolish and change parts of the house.
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2019
    Wrecked Em likes this.
  30. sfsuphysics

    sfsuphysics I don't get it

    Messages:
    13,674
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    Honestly wondered what would take them so long to just slap down the whole "You fucking agreed to it, did you not read the user agreement every single time you upgraded the software on your phone?"
     
  31. cjcox

    cjcox [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,093
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    After initially admitting they were behind the evidence presented about slowing down the phones, they have decided now that it wasn't them, and are saying, "What's this iPhone you speak of?"
     
    SamuelL421 likes this.
  32. Darkcyde

    Darkcyde n00b

    Messages:
    29
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Soo, Apple admits to degrading and slowing down older phones to force you to buy a new one. Confirmed.
     
    Sikkyu likes this.
  33. Brokennails

    Brokennails [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,889
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Funnily enough, I have never had a phone have problems with battery causing crashes and whatever else they are claiming. I have had shitty battery life though. Guess apple designed their shit wrong?
     
    Wrecked Em and spine like this.
  34. Sycraft

    Sycraft [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,421
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    The funny thing is if they just weren't such douches about it, this kind of thing could be a PR win and a feature they could sell. If when phones got old and battery life wasn't doing as well a message came up that said "Hey, your phone is old, we can increase the battery by slowing down the CPU to compensate, would you like us to do that? You can always change the setting later." Fanboys would praise them for extending the life of you "investment". Instead they decided to be dicks about it and here we are with a lawsuit.
     
    TordanGow likes this.
  35. zkostik

    zkostik Gawd

    Messages:
    931
    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Well, if the law allows for this then why wouldn't they user this to get out? As for bullshit and absurdity, I keep saying this over and over, vote with your wallet people! There are tons of alternatives and yet people keep coming back for more anal they repeatedly get from Apple.
     
  36. SolarisGuru

    SolarisGuru [H]Lite

    Messages:
    72
    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2016
    What a crock of shit.
     
  37. THRESHIN

    THRESHIN 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,936
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2002
    Buying an apple product is a lot like buying a butt plug. You should be able to figure out where that thing is going.
     
  38. WyldeStile

    WyldeStile Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    156
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Using Apple's arguement, Apple is not only the contractor, but also the building owner. As the contractor, they intentionally made the living conditions so onerous, that you had to move. Hopefully to their newer housing. It just so happens that it is also more expensive housing.
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2019
  39. GoldenTiger

    GoldenTiger [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    18,438
    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Wrong! They slowed them to prevent random shutoff from weak, old batteries. Please have some idea of what you're talking about when posting.
     
  40. wizzi01

    wizzi01 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,938
    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2008
    So apple apple doesn't control iOS which slowed the phone down?