I agree with much what you said. People tend to jump to conclusions, make rash judgements and then defend their opinions to the hill in court cases. Plus are not searches normally limited in scope, while an invite can be everything goes?With this it can change because you can allow but you can also make them get a warrant and they have to convince a judge to say yes.
With this you’re suggesting an over reach of mega proportions. What you saying is they came once and someone may have said yes which then gives them permission for all subsequent visits.
What I object to is someone coming in essentially reading a diary and then being prosecuted for it. Under the guise of finding the pedo’s where does it stop? What if I’m writing a novel (murder mystery) and they go so far as to read my notes? Where exactly is this magical line?
Which how do we know everyone checking these things are ethical? trained? And have any background at all in law?