Apple: 2018 MacBook Pro Throttling Is a Bug, Fix Now Available

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by Megalith, Jul 24, 2018.

  1. diehardman

    diehardman n00b

    Messages:
    43
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    The i9 is running into thermal issues on a other laptops https://www.notebookcheck.net/Some-...nning-any-faster-than-a-Core-i7.317268.0.html . This is mostly Intel's fault for keeping the same TDP as the i7, and basing the TDP off the base frequency. For the XPS 15, I was more referring to the massive QC issues that something like the XPS has and nobody cares, but that's probably a different topic.

    This is too-aggressive thermal throttling that took less than a week to be fixed (are the i9 models even available at retail?) It's a mountain out of a molehill.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2018
  2. A Little Teapot

    A Little Teapot Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    146
    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2016
    Given Apple's preference for quiet fans over efficient cooling, I'd wager not very long at all. Probably just past the warranty period.
     
    jnemesh likes this.
  3. viper1152012

    viper1152012 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,025
    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Funny that post about i9 processors does NOT illustrate the same issue as the mac pro with i9.
    Try again
     
  4. diehardman

    diehardman n00b

    Messages:
    43
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    jnemesh likes this.
  5. Exavior

    Exavior [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,660
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2005


    Yes, that is how the person got it that did the original reivew. Just go to apple's site and you can configure a pro to have an i9. So they are out at retail.

    As point out in the person I quoted below different issue so no this isn't the exact same issue on every i9 device. In what you posted it states that i9 runs at 0 - 30% better. Yes 0% better is not good, but at least running at no improvement is still better at than worse performance. So it might be showing an issue, but not that all have the same issue that Apple just fixed. A slight difference.

    you mean an i7 and an i9 running at the exact same performance isn't the same as an i9 running much slower? Next you are going to tell me a $10 bill and a $100 bill aren't worth the same value.

    You are currently trying to move the goal post. Sadly you are the person that is acting more like a fanboy in that you are upset that people are not putting Apple up on a pedestal and praising them. The article that you linked to did not show what you were stating which is all i9 laptops have the problem were at best they are worse off than an i7. Which is what you were being called out for and being told to try again. You did show that i9s are not always out performing at as high of levels, but that is a different statement than what you made. That second article you linked to there does show that that patch appears to resolve the performance issue, but that is not what you posted a link to a few post above when you were trying to show that the XPS 15 also runs far slower on a i9 CPU. So you are trying to argue very different points and are all over the place with what you are trying to prove.

    Your mentality, and those like you, is the reason this is more of a news story than what you linked to. The mindset that Apple can do no wrong, they are not at fault for anything and everything they make is perfect. Think of issues like a beach ball. If you toss it into the water it will float, and be pretty steady and blends into the water. The same with issues, if there is normal discussion they just go with the tide and aren't that major of news. Now as soon as you try to hold that ball under water it is going to want to push up and will pop out of the water. Just like people trying to overly defend an issue. The more people try to push it down and make it into a none issue the more people will push back and the more of a news story it will become because people are going to push back harder and harder until it flies up. Nobody is going to overly defend Dell / Alienware and claim that all their releases are perfect and without fault. Hell, most will probably just say that the issue is what is stamped on the lid not the hardware inside. That is vs an Apple loyalist who is going to flight tooth and nail to defend Apple and prove to the world that the device is perfect in every way and there is no way that anything could be less than the highest standard with every square inch of the unit. As soon as you get that mindset going, people are going to latch on and start to fight back.
     
  6. diehardman

    diehardman n00b

    Messages:
    43
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    This was an overly long response to the wrong person. I have 0 Apple products and just the find the double standards regarding Apple products on this forum funny. Anyone thinking that Apple products don't have any problems is a fanboy or a moron, and anyone making this issue out to be some huge thing is .. also that. Apple haters have plenty to attack, but this one was the wrong hill to die on.

    BTW i never said the XPS was slower when it had an i9, it was in reference to its VRM throttling issues. https://www.ultrabookreview.com/14875-fix-throttling-xps-15/
     
  7. Neapolitan6th

    Neapolitan6th [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,038
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2016
    I like to slam Apple as much as the next guy. Just give me a reason
     
  8. Kaitian

    Kaitian [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,872
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Therefore reducing the amount of power that Apple specified when they released this product. Hence it's a design flaw that cannot be fixed by software. People actually have to go out of their way to upgrade the laptop to include the i9 which supposedly delivers more performance than their default option. Since this performs worse than their default option, this is a design flaw.
     
    jnemesh likes this.
  9. diehardman

    diehardman n00b

    Messages:
    43
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    So now all laptops that don't run at max turbo boost are now fundamentally flawed by design? got it.
     
  10. Kaitian

    Kaitian [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,872
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    No, just this one. Why is their default option better performing than their i9 upgrade that they have to go out of their way to select? Oh that's right, the motherboard cannot handle the i9 because they did not design it properly ergo a design flaw.

    What does Apple advertise?
    morepower.PNG

    So if your upgrade to the i9 does not deliver more power / performance than the default option, then it's a design flaw.

    This is their default selection for that model
    default.PNG
     
    jnemesh likes this.
  11. diehardman

    diehardman n00b

    Messages:
    43
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    Um, it does?

     
  12. Kaitian

    Kaitian [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,872
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    They're not comparing apples to oranges in that screenshot. You really can't read, can you? "2017 2.9Ghz Core i7". That's not the same model / generation.

    I'll highlight it again for you

    "2017 2.9Ghz Core i7"
     
  13. diehardman

    diehardman n00b

    Messages:
    43
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    You highlighted the new model advertising more power and performance, and it does that. Then you move the goalpost after that to be "from the default option", to which we have already talked about the problems with the i9 in general. I would recommend a listen to a recent podcast with Ian Cutress here https://overcast.fm/+K8lj8r8ZQ
     
  14. macksomerville

    macksomerville [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,972
    Joined:
    May 18, 2000
    Well played!
     
    Jim Kim, jnemesh and alxlwson like this.
  15. Kaitian

    Kaitian [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,872
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    No, it doesn't. I moved no goalpost. You did when you linked me a twitter post that didn't compare apples to oranges. It's still a significant design flaw due to the VRM not being able to provide power to the processor despite the processor being capable of handling more. I recommend Louis Rossman if you're going to make recommendations then

     
    jnemesh likes this.
  16. Neapolitan6th

    Neapolitan6th [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,038
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2016
    It seems Apple's patch did end up alleviating some of the issues that caused the original controversy.

    One of the first youtubers to call out Apple for thermal throttling (Dave Lee), has since posted his before and post patch results. And the issue has seemed to largely go away.

    He also briefly compares his results to 6 other core i9 laptops that he has looked at (3 thin and lights, 3 bigger gaming style ones)

    He found that the Macbook Pro fell in line with other systems of its weight class and it did so with the lowest noise levels of the batch.

    So aside from barking at companies to make their devices chunkier, I think the controversy is largely done here.

    Of course I would withhold judgement until a more technical reviewer runs some more in depth analysis on pre and post patch performance.
     
    DocNo, Jim Kim and Ocellaris like this.
  17. Kaitian

    Kaitian [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,872
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    I suspect that these will start failing immediately around when the warranty is up and they do a stealth announcement that they will be doing a fix within 3 years of the purchase date.
     
  18. ZeqOBpf6

    ZeqOBpf6 Gawd

    Messages:
    596
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2014
    This would suggest that the software engineering team at Apple, working with the hardware engineering team at Apple would know more than the front page peanut gallery at Hardocp, which is impossible. That much we have established. So sorry, not clicking the video link, but you're wrong.
     
    mope54, alxlwson and haz_mat like this.
  19. Neapolitan6th

    Neapolitan6th [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,038
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2016
    I'm bit confused it sounds like you are agreeing with me and disagreeing with me at the same time.

    While in reality I wasn't trying to take an opinion and put to bed some of the armchair experts duking it out here.

    Confused about you and the video link too. It would seem to support your opinion?

    I also deferred judgement to more informed tech journalists for the final word on the matter.

    Just wondering if some allies were caught in the crossfire here? Or maybe that was just your initial sarcasm carried through the whole paragraph? Because I agree with what you're saying dude, so I'm thinking something got lost in translation (my translation probably)
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2018
  20. Shadowed

    Shadowed Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    496
    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2018
    Absolutely. I make my fans go to 6200RPM (max) once CPU hits 72C. Out of the box, Apple allows 100C.

    MacsFanControl FTW.
     
  21. juanrga

    juanrga Pro-Intel / Anti-AMD Just FYI

    Messages:
    2,550
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2017
    This official patch is better than the unofficial patch that tunned settings to stop VRM throttling

     
  22. Mugato

    Mugato Muh Feelz!

    Messages:
    933
    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2014
    Lolololill
     
    Jim Kim likes this.
  23. viper1152012

    viper1152012 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,025
    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Dropped top clocks and v to offset temps to stop throttling in avg usage. Not impressed with the poor heat dissapation. Try again. (Since you love hearing it so much)
     
  24. viper1152012

    viper1152012 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,025
    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    I never said i9 processors were Implemented well in ANY manufacturer, however since this thread is complaining about Apple not being above board at engineering a BETTER (not) solution than their competitors, then I am commenting on that.

    Its bad. Not good.

    I have customers that want to transcode on these and I wave them away from the i9 show.

    I7 8750h has my vote.
     
  25. w4ffles

    w4ffles 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,173
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2008
    It's being throttled to below base clock. That's the issue. If it could run 100% at base clock on all 4 cores then this wouldn't have been an issue.

    LinusTechTips tested the claims. They tried exporting a video in Final Cut Pro and the CPU throttled in under a minute.
     
  26. zkostik

    zkostik Gawd

    Messages:
    929
    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    I bet they will last long enough to fall out of the default warranty or Apple will no honor warranty stating machine has been abused and melted for being used with inadequate cooling or surface that covers vents. Given their track record and my experiences, I really wouldn't be surprised if this comes out to be true.
     
  27. zkostik

    zkostik Gawd

    Messages:
    929
    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Except Dell XP15 is nearly $1500 cheaper for same exact specs so you can still very much argue against Apple in this department. I would agree that both have no excuse to throttle given their high price.
     
    Ranulfo likes this.
  28. Unter Dog

    Unter Dog Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    136
    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2016
    I always ask my software engineers to fix my mistakes
     
  29. juanrga

    juanrga Pro-Intel / Anti-AMD Just FYI

    Messages:
    2,550
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2017
    Improvement on Blender after the patch



    Both performance and efficiency increased.
     
    ZeqOBpf6 likes this.