Nice to see pricing drop on the 60hz 4K monitors
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...qUZKBigS6NakpG5mzT_74YB8sgNo0JOCuexoCKEjw_wcB
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...qUZKBigS6NakpG5mzT_74YB8sgNo0JOCuexoCKEjw_wcB
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
4k and TN should never happen, ever..
It's an abomination.
Hush your face. TN is still the clear winner for fast paced gaming.
Actually, MVA and IPS can switch every bit as fast as TN.
Hush your face. TN is still the clear winner for fast paced gaming.
~waits for the inevitable person shocked that this is not IPS/120hz~.
Well then, I'll just take MY money elsewhere!
*nose so far in air they flip over*
Actually, MVA and IPS can switch every bit as fast as TN.
The Asus PB287Q is the only properly tested 4k TN which has <28ms delay, which is higher than most of the multi-input 27" 1440p monitors. IMO 4K TN's are junk since they are charging 600$ for slightly sharper (depending on scaling), matte 60hz TN's one would normally pay <250$ for, and the best 24" TNs have better colors since they suffer from less gamma shift and are less viewing angle dependent.
Why are these so much cheaper than WQHD monitors?
Wouldn't 4K be a bit small in text for a 28" ?
TN, that's a funny way to spell CRT.
With severe ghosting. It's physically impossible to lower persistance in an IPS matrix enough to prevent ghosting at high refresh rates, and overdrive modes add overshoot. Realistically IPS panels could probably do ~96Hz without issues.Technically, the IPS design does not switch as fast, but it can switch fast enough to do 120 Hz.
It would be unusual to use native DPI on a screen like this. The idea is to bump up the DPI to make everything bigger, but clearer.Why are these so much cheaper than WQHD monitors?
Wouldn't 4K be a bit small in text for a 28" ?
With severe ghosting. It's physically impossible to lower persistance in an IPS matrix enough to prevent ghosting at high refresh rates, and overdrive modes add overshoot. Realistically IPS panels could probably do ~96Hz without issues.
With severe ghosting. It's physically impossible to lower persistance in an IPS matrix enough to prevent ghosting at high refresh rates, and overdrive modes add overshoot. Realistically IPS panels could probably do ~96Hz without issues.
Quit exaggerating. LCD is mature enough that you see no real ghosting issues on a good IPS panel. The process can achieve 120hz just as well as TN. Does that mean we're going to get it anytime soon? No, because mfg's are just fine selling dipshit gamers overpriced 144hz TN pos panels. And gamers are buying..
And while we're at it, LCD tech as a whole is, and always has been a giant turd of a technology. Why we landed on this limited, garbage standard is beyond me. OLED cannot get here fast enough. And even then it appears it will be a while before it matures and we get past the silly input latency the current sets are displaying.