Any LTO5 USB3 drives?

Discussion in 'Optical & Backup Drives' started by Quartz-1, Apr 1, 2012.

  1. Quartz-1

    Quartz-1 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,257
    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    It would be very nice to have a transportable LTO 5 drive with a USB 3 interface. Are there any? My search-fu has failed me.
     
  2. mwroobel

    mwroobel [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,942
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    There are none available, nor do I ever expect to see one available.
     
  3. Quartz-1

    Quartz-1 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,257
    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Bother.

    Okay, I'll bite! Why not?
     
  4. mwroobel

    mwroobel [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,942
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    LTO5 has a high initial entry cost, which is not where storage pricing for consumer or even prosumer sits. It also has a need for an extremely high speed of data input for it to work effectively, avoiding problems such as shoe-shining the tape. Since SAS is a generally used storage interface, it is what much of the drives ship with. Other choices such as FC and SCSI are also supported.
     
  5. Quartz-1

    Quartz-1 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,257
    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    I'm not thinking of the consumer / prosumer market; I'm thinking of the itinerant technician. I remember going round schools with a portable tape drives of the same value 20 years ago which had parallel port to SCSI converters. And USB 3 should have sufficient bandwidth.
     
  6. mwroobel

    mwroobel [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,942
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Sufficient theoretical bandwith doesn't mean you have the thoroughput on the other end to feed it. And a 20 year old parallel-scsi link that offered 1MB/sec is no longer sufficient. And companies don't design their hardware for the occasional user that might use it, they design it for who will surely use it.
     
  7. dustNbone

    dustNbone [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,032
    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    You could build a fairly compact dedicated box for the job, you'd probably want something with at least 3 hdds in a software raid5, you could likely get away with 2.5" 7200rpm drives. Then you'd need a SAS interface for the LTO drive and GbE to get the data to it. It would be a 2 step process, dumping the data over GbE to the RAID, and then writing the tape. The LTO drive is still by far the expensive part of this setup, and it won't require any special software on the backup source.

    I have an HP LTO server that I picked up used on CL, it's got 5x500GB sata drives in RAID5, and an LTO3 drive. I'm basically envisioning something alot more compact, but similar in function.
     
  8. Quartz-1

    Quartz-1 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,257
    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    It was 20 years ago.

    Like the itinerant technician?

    A lot of clients wouldn't allow a machine that wasn't theirs on their network.
     
  9. dustNbone

    dustNbone [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,032
    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    You could use a USB GbE adapter and make a private network then? The tape server wouldn't be running Windows so malware shouldn't be a problem, and you could even wipe the array between jobs to ensure you're not spreading disease.
     
  10. mwroobel

    mwroobel [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,942
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    The average tech is not walking around with an LTO5 drive and tapes. Even if it were available, would you want something you could just drag a drive or folder to, or something you would need to install backup software, drivers, etc? Techs are walking around with an external hard drive of some kind. If more than that is needed for the backup, one would hope that the client already had a backup process in place. In any case, you would be the exception rather than the rule.
     
  11. Techmasta

    Techmasta Gawd

    Messages:
    851
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Are you familiar with LTFS that was introduced with LTO5?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_Tape_File_System
     
  12. dustNbone

    dustNbone [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,032
    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    It really depends what needs to be done I guess. I could see use in something like this for one time onsite archival of large datasets, especially if the customer didn't want the data leaving the premesis. I've had requests like that before, but as my LTO setup is far from portable I've had to deny them.
     
  13. mwroobel

    mwroobel [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,942
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Even in that case, all you would be leaving them behind is a tape (or tapes) that they could not use unless you schlep the drive back to them. If you leave it on hard drives the customer can get at a file on their own if need be. I will be the first person to suggest tape for enterprise backup (I use LTO-4 at home and LTO4&5 at work), so don't take this as an anti-tape stance. I just think for ease of customer use, the hard drive backup scenario would serve them better if this is just a one-off backup (which would be in excess of the backup infrastructure they should already have or that you should sell them :) )
     
  14. mwroobel

    mwroobel [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,942
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    I am very familiar with it, unfortunately with access times of up to 4 minutes per file (the 60-90 seconds quoted in the spec aren't real life) and having to call you every time they want a file restored, they should already have a backup infrastructure in place, or you should sell them one (even if it is just a hard drive based backup)
     
  15. chx

    chx Gawd

    Messages:
    696
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Yeah I fail to see why not use a HDD. An LTO 5 cartridge being able to hold 1.5TB is about $50. A 1.5TB HDD is about $80. You are winning $30 there. You'd need ~40-50 of these to offset the initial cost of the drive. If you were to leave the HDDs behind for the client and they dont need 1.5TB then you can go with a say 320GB 2.5" HDD at the same cost as an LTO tape. I really don't get it.

    Of course if you are talking about long term storage, many petabytes backup, distribution among companies when making some sort of video/movie then the LTO is a natural choice. This is not to say LTO doesn't have its place.
     
  16. mwroobel

    mwroobel [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,942
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    In general, I am very pro tape. Tape has options that are simply not available in general hard drives such as WORM which is required in certain financial circles and where LTFS excels is in storing large, sequential RAW video. In this particular case though, as an itinerant technician (and with smaller clients that sound like they don't have backup infrastructure in place) USB Hard Drives would be the better choice.
     
  17. westrock2000

    westrock2000 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,094
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Learn something new.

    An itinerant is a person who travels from place to place with no fixed home. The term comes from the late 16th century: from late Latin itinerant (travelling), from the verb itinerari, from Latin iter, itiner (journey, road).
     
  18. Anonym00se

    Anonym00se n00b

    Messages:
    2
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2012
    ..until now.

    http://www.unitex.co.jp/products/cmtmt/lt50lt40usb.html

    I did a search for this exact issue, and this HF thread was the first link. And then further down the page.. so apparently this Japanese company is now offering an IBM LTO5 in a USB 3.0 external case as of September 2012. Yay, tape storage is relevant again! :D
     
  19. Quartz-1

    Quartz-1 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,257
    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2012
  20. Quartz-1

    Quartz-1 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,257
    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    And I find that LTO 6 drives are now available. A snip at $25K.
     
  21. Anonym00se

    Anonym00se n00b

    Messages:
    2
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2012
    ..and then I emailed them asking about retail pricing. Their reply: 700,000¥.

    Or if you prefer, about $8400USD at current exchange rates. In more practical terms, that's 3x the cost of a SAS LTO-5 drive by Quantum or HP here in the USA. Seriously, at their quoted MSRP you could buy THREE SAS drives and a controller card for each. And all they've really done is change the interface of the drive from SAS to USB 3.0 for 3x the price.

    So, not the sort of item your average itinerant technician will be carrying around.
     
  22. mwroobel

    mwroobel [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,942
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Actually, in the context that I described it in (a noun), "itinerant technician"; itinerant is defined here as "traveling from place to place"
     
  23. mwroobel

    mwroobel [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,942
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    I don't expect they will be selling many of those at that price.
     
  24. Quartz-1

    Quartz-1 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,257
    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Agreed. I don't think they're targeting the likes of me. More like IBM et al and data recovery specialists.
     
  25. NobleX13

    NobleX13 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,093
    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Well here is a chance to start a kickstarter on this topic then. :)
     
  26. Aesma

    Aesma [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,844
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Well, maybe they didn't just change the interface but put boatloads of RAM or an SSD in it to ensure a continuous stream of data that is absolutely necessary for tape.
     
  27. Walter Schrabmair

    Walter Schrabmair n00b

    Messages:
    1
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    See here:
    www[dot]storagenewsletter[dot]com/rubriques/tapes/ibm-lto-6-and-lto-5-half-high-drives-with-usb-3-0/

    or here:
    s3[dot]amazonaws[dot]com/isby/lenovopartnernetwork.com/upload/4/docs/datasheet-tape-ts2250.pdf
     

    Attached Files: