AMD Radeon VII Benchmarks Leak Out

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by AlphaAtlas, Jan 29, 2019.

  1. AlphaAtlas

    AlphaAtlas [H]ard|Gawd Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,713
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Citing the Twitter dataminers APISAK and Komachi, Videocardz spotted some Radeon VII benchmarks that leaked out ahead of the card's official launch. The card appears to have achieved a graphics score of 6688 in Fire Strike's Ultra preset, which beats out a factory overclocked RTX 2080's score of 6430, and Videocardz says the Radeon VII appears to be faster in the performance preset as well. Meanwhile, the VII appears to struggle with Final Fantasy 15's built-in benchmark. It only slightly edges out an RTX 2070 in the "standard quality" benchmark, while falling between the GTX 1070 TI and the aging 980 TI with the "high quality" preset.

    AMD Radeon VII board partner models: There will be no custom models at launch. Our sources tell us to expect such designs no sooner than during Computex (late May). So far we have few reference-based models with their own branded packaging and sometimes even custom stickers.
     
  2. Krenum

    Krenum [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,402
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    That 5324 score, YIKES!

    Not a $700 dollar score that's for sure.
     
  3. SeymourGore

    SeymourGore 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,656
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    I wasn't expecting custom models at all (figured just a filler product until high-end Navi iteration), so that's cool. Sapphire Nitro VII would get my attention.
     
  4. tordogs

    tordogs Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    486
    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Looks like still worth it to keep running the 1080Ti or install the Titan Xp that's been in a box since purchase; pass the 1080Ti to a needy soul. Await professional reviews on the Radeon VII.
     
    zkostik, Red Falcon, exlink and 2 others like this.
  5. lucidrenegade

    lucidrenegade Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    387
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2011
    Navi will save us!

    /s
     
    Dayaks, ltron and Snowdensjacket like this.
  6. dragonstongue

    dragonstongue 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,078
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2008
    I am surprised FF is used for the benchmark runs at all considering how Nv biased they are (BS tuning and way the benchmark runs) that being said, if Radeon 7 was much much closer to expected Nv GPU performance tier being used that shows R7 is actually quite the beast.

    I can imagine once AMD launches Navi the software drivers used for R7 and Navi are likely to have their very own niche.
     
  7. SPARTAN VI

    SPARTAN VI [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,095
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2004
    How does that compare to the Vega64? Fistful of salt...
     
  8. THUMPer

    THUMPer 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,925
    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    My V64 Liquid with HBM at 1180Mhz, will do 6500 in Fire Strike Ultra.
     
    Dayaks, Vercinaigh, R_Type and 4 others like this.
  9. BloodyIron

    BloodyIron 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,443
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Can't wait for the HardOCP leaked review ;)
     
  10. DukenukemX

    DukenukemX [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,391
    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    The Final Fantasy 15 benchmark isn't known to be friendly towards AMD.

     
    Vercinaigh, Darth Kyrie and Revdarian like this.
  11. Armenius

    Armenius I Drive Myself to the [H]ospital

    Messages:
    17,430
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2014
    That's 1080 Ti level on Firestrike Ultra. I got >6800 with my Titan X out of the box. 1080 Ti performance at original 1080 Ti price 2 years later.
     
    Dayaks, ltron and exlink like this.
  12. shad0w4life

    shad0w4life Gawd

    Messages:
    690
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    In the worst possible benchmark.

    Cards setting on fire are not $1200 cards
    Cards lowering graphic quality of ray tracing and then claiming they did it without changing graphic quality, not $600, $800 or $1200 cards
    RTX not a $200-$800 premium feature
     
    Vercinaigh, Wierdo, N4CR and 7 others like this.
  13. Lakados

    Lakados [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,490
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2014
    Friendly or not towards AMD, those scores hurt ... Only a week and change till the real reviews start coming out just have to be patient at this point I have to assume that any "Leaked" benchmarks are fodder and click-bait to drive up views as the release gets near.
     
  14. Captindecisive

    Captindecisive Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    156
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2017
    Not that 3D Mark is relative to how it's going to perform in games, nor is the FF XV benchmark an indication since it's heavily nvidia biased; but it seems like it could be promising. We'll know pretty soon either way. I'm looking forward to it either way.
     
  15. ir0nw0lf

    ir0nw0lf [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,286
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    I thought the Final Fantasy XV benchmark was generally poopoo'd on most websites? Or was that strictly from a RTX card perspective?
     
    Vercinaigh likes this.
  16. Derangel

    Derangel [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    17,524
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Even for Nvidia cards, FF15 is a garbage benchmark. It really has zero consistency and no one that actually cares about accuracy should ever use it in their reviews.
     
    Vercinaigh, zkostik, psyclist and 9 others like this.
  17. IdiotInCharge

    IdiotInCharge [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,284
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2003
    Cards lowering FPS to zero because they don't even have ray tracing are worth how much?

    ;)
     
    Dayaks and Hameeeedo like this.
  18. Derangel

    Derangel [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    17,524
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Ask that again in 5-10 years when the majority of games use real ray tracing. Nvidia's hybrid approach exists in one game with an abysmal implementation.
     
    Creig, RamboZombie, Dayaks and 7 others like this.
  19. IdiotInCharge

    IdiotInCharge [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,284
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2003
    ...and is supported in every API and every major engine and is in the pipe for dozens of games. And in five to ten years, we're likely to still be running a 'hybrid' approach. Rasterization isn't going away.
     
    Dayaks and Hameeeedo like this.
  20. Lakados

    Lakados [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,490
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2014
    It won't be that long, most of the RTX features are already a part of the DX12 spec or being implemented in DX12 revisions at a later date, I would say it will be 3 years at most until they are in both DX12 and Vulkan as an open spec. And by that time we should have hardware on the market that can actually handle it with out shitting the the bed.
     
    Silentbob343 likes this.
  21. fightingfi

    fightingfi Look at Me! I need the attention.

    Messages:
    2,510
    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Prolly needs new drivers\bug fixes before anything else stop judging.....
     
  22. Dodge245

    Dodge245 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    180
    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2018
    And by then amd will have an open source version.. or itll be like physx baked into game code as software...

    I have no idea why people keep saying this, oh look a 2080rtx has 1080ti performance at twice the price, but look rtx will will really matter by the time the card is up for replacement.
     
    Creig, Ranulfo, jfreund and 6 others like this.
  23. Captindecisive

    Captindecisive Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    156
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2017
    I forgot about all the games that won't launch because of missing ray tracing on the video card. Time for AMD to pack up and go home.

    Seriously though. Real time ray tracing in its current form is literally worthless. While it is good that nvidia got the wheels turning, and it's going to change the gaming industry (and other industries) when it's ready and working well, it's just not practical or useful currently unless devs can get the 1% and .1% frame drops and inconsistencies under control.
     
  24. aznpotpie

    aznpotpie [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,127
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Uhh you can get a RTX 2080 for $720 at the moment, which makes the Radeon VII in the same price category and that's how much 1080 Ti were new....
     
  25. Uvaman2

    Uvaman2 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,032
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    Yeah don't get it either.
     
  26. Derangel

    Derangel [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    17,524
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Doesn't matter how many engines support it unless developers are willing to implement it. Also, there are 11 games announced with RTX ray-tracing support. That isn't even a dozen, much less multiple dozens. Of those 11, one has actually followed through on that support. One game. In four months. I seriously doubt Metro is going to launch with ray-tracing. Shadow of the Tomb Raider may never add it. No sign of it yet in Assetto Corsa, but perhaps by the time its out of early access. Anthem is at a "maybe we'll do it" state, likely heavily dependent on whether or not the game bombs.
     
    Revdarian likes this.
  27. Uvaman2

    Uvaman2 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,032
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    So it will be an excellent deal if beats the 2080 even at a narrow margin.
    1080ti seems super overpriced in my google searches.
     
    FlawleZ likes this.
  28. aznpotpie

    aznpotpie [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,127
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    They are, used ones are going for $550-700 at the moment for a 1080 ti. I would love the performance of a 1080 ti to come down to about $400-500 bracket!
     
  29. Flexion

    Flexion [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,592
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    I wanted JHH to be wrong, but for the price the performance is indeed lousy. XD
     
    ltron likes this.
  30. Uvaman2

    Uvaman2 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,032
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    Ray tracing should have been add in cards.
     
    knowom, tordogs, dvsman and 1 other person like this.
  31. Maddness

    Maddness [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,171
    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2014
    I'm pretty sure I read that Metro Exodus will have Ray Tracing on the 25th of February. But the game launches on the 15th.
     
  32. CombatChrisNC

    CombatChrisNC [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,124
    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2013
    Never pre-order.

    Always wait for the [H[.

    /thread
     
    Geforcepat, knowom, maxius and 9 others like this.
  33. TangledThornz

    TangledThornz Gawd

    Messages:
    635
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2018
    I don't trust leaked benchmarks. I'll wait till the reviews come in.
     
    SPARTAN VI and SeymourGore like this.
  34. FlawleZ

    FlawleZ Gawd

    Messages:
    790
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Let's not forget Radeon VII will come with 16GB of VRAM. This is where the RTX 2080 will struggle with only 8GB. I see 7-7.5GB of VRAM usage on my Vega 64 now in 4K. Upcoming titles will need more VRAM for 4K. The RTX 2080 is looking like Nvidia's Fury.
     
    Cooe, funkydmunky, knowom and 3 others like this.
  35. Boscoh

    Boscoh [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,160
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    The only thing I am really interested in for this card is what the 16GB of HBM does for performance at 4K and VR versus the 2080. I think we all pretty much realize this card was released because Navi wasn't ready.
     
    Ranulfo, Marees and Darkstalker420 like this.
  36. Derangel

    Derangel [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    17,524
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Can't find anything saying that but if that's true its not too bad. Makes it weird that they didn't highlight Metro during their CES presentation though. Metro was probably the most impressive thing they had to show from the launch announcement, weird that they wouldn't show it off again if the effects really were that close to release.
     
  37. STEM

    STEM Gawd

    Messages:
    561
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Those of you who have seen my past posts about NVIDIA know that I don't like NVIDIA very much, and for sure I believe that the RTX series is an overpriced clusterfuck, with it's only saving grace is that it's not worse than the previous generation, yet except for the 2080 Ti and TITAN RTX, not any better either. As such, I believe that right now the best value is the GTX 1080 Ti, especially when you can find one for $600 or less brand new. Or get two of them in SLI and sure as hell they will stomp an RTX 2080 Ti. I'm just laying this out to show how hopeless the Radeon VII is.

    The Radeon Vega VII is Radeon Instinct MI50, on slightly different PCB with a different cooler and no PCI-E 4.0 support. AMD either has an oversupply of MI50 chips or they are trying to pull a PR stunt to seem competitive. Either way, they are not even breaking even on a GPU that is not really competitive with NVIDIA gaming GPUs. I hope I'm wrong. As much as I hate Jensen's behavior, I believe that he was laughing on the inside about how little effort AMD put into this new product.

    I was excited for about 30 seconds until I saw what it really was. I'm not buying one, that's for sure.

    AMD is making good progress with Ryzen, however, it's like they are letting their GPU division die a slow death. And it's ironic and sad because AMD was in trouble for so long exactly because they bought ATI 13 years ago, and also overpaid for it. I don't think that overpriced GPUs like the ones from NVIDIA have a bright future with big expensive to produce chips at their heart, so AMD's angle would be to offer a solid midrange that is priced competitively. The big monolithic designs will come to an end sooner or later, and AMD has the expertise now to create effective MCM designs. Maybe we'll see something similar to Threadripper with their future GPUs as well. Or maybe they will tank their GPU division for good. One can only hope for the better.
     
    Darkstalker420, ltron and bigmac11 like this.
  38. Lumpus

    Lumpus Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    246
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    The last conventional wisdom I heard was that this was a way to use up 'defective' leftover chips that couldn't be used in the $2k+ machine learning card and that was never really intended for gamers.
    Also the cost of that 16G HBM2 memory means that they're losing money on every card they sell @ $700.

    It's still probably ideal for machine learning or CAD/Engineering/Scientific apps - pc gaming, probably not so much
     
    Marees and Slash3 like this.
  39. Bawjaws

    Bawjaws Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    434
    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2017
    Those bolded words are doing a lot of work.
     
    R_Type and IdiotInCharge like this.
  40. Lumpus

    Lumpus Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    246
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Give them and Navi (Zen 3) time...
    I think everyone forgets how badly in debt AMD was 2-3 years ago where they had to sell off their own manufacturing facilities in order to survive. Yes, their #1 object since has been to make a profit - which Zen 1 & 2 have done... at the cost of focusing their efforts on their higher profit product lines (like machine learning). The success of Ryzen, Threadripper, and Epyx saved AMD from extinction, but I think they are still at this point paying off debt rather than dumping all of that fresh cash into R&D. High-end GPU's for the enthusiast market is probably not a critical focus for them - probably not enough market or potential profit there to be worth throwing all of their limited eggs in that basket and incuring a likely price-war with nVidia. Zen 3 + chiplets could allow AMD to cautiously set out to control the lower/mid GPU market later this year at performance/price first.... then the RTX killer later in 2020.

    AMD is playing the long game now and I think it's already paying off.
    /shrug
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2019