AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Video Card Review @ [H]

Discussion in 'AMD Flavor' started by FrgMstr, Jun 24, 2015.

  1. Trepidati0n

    Trepidati0n [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,857
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    My biggest problem with this card was the insane amount of hype by AMD about it; they made it sound like the seconding coming of Jesus. The general buzz was +30% by AMD fans, +10% by nVidia fans, and about +20% by people who didn't have one camp or another in the mind. The fact it didn't even hit +0% compared to the 980ti...that is the "thud".

    It isn't a bad priced card...and it isn't a bad card...it is just sort of "there". However, this will cause AMD to sell of a ton of their 290 series. :D
     
  2. w00t69

    w00t69 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    337
    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2004
    I can't believe the VRM's have a copper pipe with liquid coolant running over the top of them still hitting over 100C at stock clockspeeds.
     
  3. maverick786us

    maverick786us [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,923
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2006
    Releasing a card of same architecture after 2 years with slight bump in the clock speed, and yet its lagging behind an year old gtx 980 with double the power consumption? One of the worst thing AMD has ever produced.

    NVidia's fermi too was in the same league. GTX 480 was power hungry heater with marginal better speed than 5870. But nVidia made some refinement with the existing fermi architecture, and released 580 which was faster than its predecessor with less power consumption and less heat.

    AMD didn't even refined its existing architecture and released a card, which consumes more power than 290x. These cards shouldn't have come at first place.

    Fury X is a good card and I believe with slight bump with the new drivers, it might perform as good as 980ti. So if AMD price it on par with 980, it will not only make customers happy, but might result in a record sales for AMD thus overcoming their debit.
     
  4. YeuEmMaiMai

    YeuEmMaiMai [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,052
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    no water cooling on the VRM? because that is the only way they hit 100C
     
  5. SixFootDuo

    SixFootDuo [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,527
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    You just answered your own question.

    Perception is everything. The way the human brain works is that it if encounters something negative, any other quality doesn't matter. Example, long blonde hair, pretty face, big boobs oh, and her teeth are rotted out. You're not going to take her home. Now, you might go over to her trailer after 10pm, run a few benchmarks but your not going to spend $650 on her.

    Now, if she suddenly came up with the $550 to fix her teeth, well hell, we have a winner.
     
  6. tonyftw

    tonyftw [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,817
    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    It does just not effective.
     
  7. TH put a thermal scanner on the card and looked at the PCIe connection which was close to 100C

    And yes the VRMS are part of the heat block.

     
  8. nightanole

    nightanole [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    2,013
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    You do realized its already stated this card can only OC 100mhz, and is voltage locked. It was so not worth it, they didnt even put a section in the review.
     
  9. Kranium

    Kranium Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    432
    Joined:
    May 27, 2011
    Looking at this I'd be interested in the nano for a little gaming on my htpc, but the lack of HDMI 2.0 is a real killer, I plan to have a 4k tv within the next two years and I would want any gpu purchase for a htpc to last closer to 3, hell I am using a 560ti in there right now.

    The Fury looks like a card that is 6-12months late. If this had come out last summer it would have made a killing.
     
  10. The only reason it's locked is because the drivers don't enable it....for now. AMD kept bragging about headroom for overclockability. This might have been more talking out of the side of their mouth, but I can't imagine they would sit there and brag about something that wasn't available.
     
  11. Flopper

    Flopper [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,642
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    software crap.
    Needs to die.
     
  12. Parja

    Parja [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    11,689
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2002
    It looks like there might be a row of VRMs on the back side of the card.

    [​IMG]

    Since they're just shrouded by a backplate, no surprise they're getting to 100C.
     
  13. DejaWiz

    DejaWiz Oracle of Unfortunate Truths

    Messages:
    19,067
    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    But at the same price point? It took WC to get there, and it still loses in every critical metric important to enthusiasts save for operating temperature.

    When I'm staring at a shelf with only the 980ti and Fury X on it, should i spend the same price on "new tech", even though "it almost performs as good as"?

    Hell no.

    I want the most bang for the buck. That leaves the Fury X still in the shrink wrap collecting dust.

    I said it before and I'll say it again: the AIO is going to be a crippling point for the Fury X. The majority doesn't want to make (or even have) the space for dedicated GPU radiators in their chassis. This is a niche/halo product being pushed as a mainstream flagship, and it's going to backfire badly. And that is aside from the fact it can't even hang with the competitors mainstream flagship, let alone their niche/halo offering.
     
  14. Brent_Justice

    Brent_Justice Moderator

    Messages:
    17,755
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2000
    Basically, anyone who has their finger on GameWorks as the blame want us to not use games to evaluate performance of these video cards because they have GW 3D effects the developer has chosen to use in their games.

    You know how ridiculous that is?

    If you don't want to see how games perform between video cards, then what the heck are you buying your video cards to do ?

    I really don't get it. The only way to find out the kind of gameplay experience a video card delivers in games, is well, to use those games. Theoretical benchmarks aint gonna tell you how Batman performs, the only way to find out how Batman performs on video cards, is to test Batman.

    Maybe I'm thinking with too much common sense.
     
  15. shad0w4life

    shad0w4life Gawd

    Messages:
    690
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Should wait for 4k tvs with DisplayPort 1.3 since it can do 4k@120Hz, you know because future proof has been the massive argument so far.
     
  16. runs2far

    runs2far Gawd

    Messages:
    895
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2011
    Source?

    I think it looks like a fine card, it may not kick the 980 TI to the curb, but at the same price as a 980TI, you get great 1440p performance and a good closed loop cooler.

    Had AMD launched it with an air cooler, the price would have to be ~10% lower.

    Luckily I can write whatever I want, as I have never considered buying such an expensive card.

    EDIT:

    Never mind, THG is the source.
     
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2015
  17. tonyftw

    tonyftw [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,817
    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    No thermal pads on the backplate either. Looks like it's there just for aesthetics.
     
  18. YeuEmMaiMai

    YeuEmMaiMai [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,052
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    Drivers always improve performance of new cards over time
     
  19. Parja

    Parja [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    11,689
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2002
    Exactly. It's not a cooling feature. It's just a shroud...which would impede airflow and keep the components on the back even hotter.
     
  20. YeuEmMaiMai

    YeuEmMaiMai [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,052
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    I am not talking about price I am talking about tech... nice you bring that up though... if you want my opinion about price, yes it should be $50 cheaper
     
  21. Brent_Justice

    Brent_Justice Moderator

    Messages:
    17,755
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2000
    So you are against forward looking technologies like realistic hair simulation?

    NVIDIA and AMD both help promote the PC gaming environment by creating 3D programs and effects to exploit new hardware and bring forth unique effects in games. You should want that as a gamer.

    The developer is the one who decides what technologies to implement. If you aren't seeing enough AMD created features in games, I would look toward AMD to evangelize its technologies to game developers better to convince them to implement it.

    NVIDIA is playing to win, AMD needs to play ball and do the same. I want competition, it is good for this industry.
     
  22. Ummm no. If you are spending this kind of coin you are likely building your own rig. And if you are building your own rig, you are going to chose a good case with at least one 120mm fan port. In fact just about all 3rd party ATX case designs I know of have a 120mm out the back.
     
  23. AVogel

    AVogel Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    247
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Question for Brent:

    Have you tried replicating the benches in the Reviewers Guide where they used 0xAF? Seems they really tweaked every possible setting just to try to make the Fury X look competitive (not even good, just competitive).
     
  24. quikt

    quikt Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    172
    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Got some laughs from this [​IMG]

    on topic, are there any reviews of the fury x in crossfire?
     
  25. YeuEmMaiMai

    YeuEmMaiMai [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,052
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    the difference is one lets everyone have access to it and does hinder the performance of their competitor, the other one locks everyone out and does hinder the performance of their competitor
     
  26. Brent_Justice

    Brent_Justice Moderator

    Messages:
    17,755
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2000
    No, I really don't use those things as a guide for my testing.
     
  27. Brent_Justice

    Brent_Justice Moderator

    Messages:
    17,755
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2000
    whether true or not, the developer is still in control of what technologies they want to implement in their game, and that is their choice, and the experience they want to deliver

    our job is just to find out how said game performs and looks on video cards, compare it, and find which one provides the best value for the money

    it really is that simple, the only way to see Game A's performance, is to test Game A, we aren't going to pick sides and start cherry picking games on whether NVIDIA or AMD features are present, that would indeed be biased
     
  28. DejaWiz

    DejaWiz Oracle of Unfortunate Truths

    Messages:
    19,067
    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    That's a bullshit cop-out and you know it. AMD chose to price this as they did, knowing full well what they were delivering to market. Can't have a GPU if you don't spend the money to get it. Price is an absolute crucial metric.


    That's a bullshit cop-out and you know it. The majority of buyers in this price segment should not be expected to nor required to build an entirely new system to house a GPU or two that doesn't compete with a competitors product that is easily installed in just about any existing build. Hell, I'm willing to bet that a majority of Titan buyers didn't build entirely new systems for their overpriced $1000 apiece GPUs.
     
  29. Trepidati0n

    Trepidati0n [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,857
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    Unless there are lines of code which basically says

    Code:
    if(card = AMD) then fuck over
    then it doesn't hinder. All it does is allow the HW vendor to show their product in the best light. If you can't respect that, then you fall the level of a childish academic. I don't buy a video card to watch benchmarks...I buy them to play games. If a vendor does more work via all available avenues to provide me a better experience for less $ than the its competitor, great.
     
  30. Daroller

    Daroller [H]Lite

    Messages:
    127
    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2011
    Who cares? AMD's marketing push said it would be better than it is. It is an underwhelming product launch made all the worse by their marketing department telling bald-faced lies.

    Don't get this twisted. Everyone would like to see viable, competitive products from AMD. The Fury X doesn't reach that goal.
     
  31. If you're building a high end system and don't pick a good case to begin with then you are an idiot.

    Also high end GPUs and CPUs require high end power supplies. That also means a custom build most likely with a good case.

    Or are you dumb enough to try to fit one of these into a Dell Latitude?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 24, 2015
  32. MorgothPl

    MorgothPl 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,016
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    The first prices in my country came up. Cheapest Fury is 2990 PLN, which is in league of cheapest vanilla 980 Ti - and it's about $800. AiB 980 Ti start from $80 more for MSI 980 Gaming up to $134 for Evga SC+ ACX 2.0 edition.

    Considering getting rid of my SLI setup for one of those cards, and it looks like MSI 980 Ti for me... $80 aint that much for 2 GB more VRAM and few more FPS.
     
  33. bryanw1995

    bryanw1995 n00b

    Messages:
    31
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    You guys are catching a lot of criticism because you test only a few games. Testing such a low number has, perhaps, caused you to reach different conclusions, or at least far more negative ones, from pretty much every other review site on the planet. Perhaps in the future you could do 10 or 15 tests instead of just a couple?
     
  34. Hazard

    Hazard Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    336
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
  35. Banko

    Banko Gawd

    Messages:
    991
    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2004
    Sure but a while back I went for a MiniITX build where I wanted a tiny case with the best single GPU money can buy.

    At the time I went with the Titan, and then I updated to the Titan X. There is no room anywhere for me to fit a Fury X even if I wanted to.
     
  36. bexamous

    bexamous [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,670
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Dislike the very end of the review:

    > In terms of gaming performance, the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X seems like better competition for the GeForce GTX 980 4GB video card, rather than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. GTX 980 cards are selling for as low at $490 today. This is not a good thing since the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X is priced at $649, the same price as the GeForce GTX 980 Ti.

    This seems like a bit of an exageration. There is a pretty big gap between 980 and 980Ti, the FuryX is much closer to the 980Ti than 980. Seems like an unwarrented dig, especially considering 980 was not part of review.
     
  37. Brent_Justice

    Brent_Justice Moderator

    Messages:
    17,755
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2000
    We don't do tests, we play games and relate that gaming experience between video cards to you. It takes time to play games. We go for quality over quantity. We do all we possibly can. If you want to find out how games perform, this is the place for you, if not, we won't include useless testing.
     
  38. MorgothPl

    MorgothPl 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,016
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Speaking of which... Brent, you have any numbers for the mess that is called Arkham Knight? Is it on par 980 Ti, or as in other games - likee 10% below?
     
  39. bexamous

    bexamous [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,670
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    There is 100 sites doing all the same testing, and then there is [H] doing different type. We don't need 101 sites doing all the same testing.
     
  40. Brent_Justice

    Brent_Justice Moderator

    Messages:
    17,755
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2000
    Nothing yet, I will start it soon. I have a large backlog of evaluations to work on, and right now I am recovering from the Fury X review :p