Surprised this still has limited traction in terms of news awareness.
Ironically this would be all over the news and various forum sites (and not in a good way) if it was Nvidia
Will be interesting to see how this pans out and whether they can win the case outright, they want a limited exclusion order with a permanent cease and desist for the relevant companies.
https://www.techpowerup.com/230260/amd-files-patent-infringement-complaint-against-lg-vizio-others
Here is the actual filing: http://www.itcblog.com/images/amdcomplaint.pdf
Cheers
Ironically this would be all over the news and various forum sites (and not in a good way) if it was Nvidia
Will be interesting to see how this pans out and whether they can win the case outright, they want a limited exclusion order with a permanent cease and desist for the relevant companies.
https://www.techpowerup.com/230260/amd-files-patent-infringement-complaint-against-lg-vizio-others
According to the complaint, these patents generally relate to architectures for graphics processing unit (GPU) circuitry. The '506 patent relates to "a graphics processing architecture that enables a large amount of graphics data to be rendered to a frame buffer". The '133 patent relates to specialized "texture" processing circuitry that is employed by GPUs. Lastly, the '454 patent relates to a "unified shader" hardware architecture for GPUs. The complaint specifically refers to various televisions and smartphones, specifically, towards the graphics processing systems within those televisions and smartphones - as infringing products.
Here is the actual filing: http://www.itcblog.com/images/amdcomplaint.pdf
Cheers
Last edited: