Criticalhitkoala
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2015
- Messages
- 1,987
I know is this a joke? Why even do it then?
I know people would argue "The same price" competitor. But I think that was kinda shallow on AMD"s part tbh.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know is this a joke? Why even do it then?
using a none HT chip for comparison? Really.
Ryzen + NAVI beat i9 9900K + 2080 ti?
It appears, if this is an honest bench, to have to do with the ecosystem and the interconnectivity. Something to be tested I think when all parts are released.
105WWhat was tdp on 3900x?
I was just blogging what they said in the presentation. I'm waiting on Brent_Justice to test it.In ONE canned benchmark. Let's not jump to conclusions yet. For context, a Vega 64 was already faster than 2070 in this particular benchmark:
View attachment 163516
be lucky to get 100 me thinksoverall good presentation from AMD imho. Only cringey thing was the Acer guy to me and that non HT blender demo. I'm pretty excited and feel quite confident that I'll get some value from my recently purchase 2700x but will be very happy with the upgrade to the 3900 in a few months. Anyone wanna 2700x for $150 in 2 months?
No, definitly wasn't. They just didn't want to cannibalize their TR platform entry point at this moment. They were capable of pushing it out like that.so the 16 core part was a figment of the imagination?
be lucky to get 100 me thinks
so the 16 core part was a figment of the imagination?
so the 16 core part was a figment of the imagination?
No, but there has been long standing speculation that it would release down the line. There's no real need for them to release it right now.
Given Intels inability to get to 10-7nm I think AMD might have the performance crown for awhile. I don’t know how Intel expects to launch a new 9900KS with 5Ghz all cores wtf will they use to cool that and what’s the TDP?
I think it's the smarter move from AMD to release a 12 core imho. Just enough for what feels like an upgrade worth the 66% increase in price, but not enough to make people who buy your more mainstream $329 product think they are getting shafted. As much as power users feel like we matter to the bottom line, it's the $200 spenders that make companies money. If AMD immediately release a 16 core chip, it basically would tell their $329 users they are the new "Average". Could bite them in the butt.
Intel is already shipping 10nm, and it's a better process than TSMC's 7nm, though TSMC appears to have gotten the volume out first.
As for the 9900KS- if it's well-binned, then the overall requirements won't change. Most are going to be running them with 240mm/280mm/360mm AIOs which can handle the heat without a problem.
It would be in an entirely different category though and wouldn’t be for gamers. The clocks would be lower I’d imagine.