I posted a thread a while back for some suggestions / info on PC4000 - and the day of reckoning (Feb 1st when my fiscal situation is ready for my purchase) is fast approaching.
I've been looking at a variety of ~$300 CDN PC4000 3-4-4-8 / 3-4-3-8 ranged 2x1024mb kits. OCZ, Crucial, Corsair - with a lean towards OCZ.
Grabbing an Opteron 165 to go with it, and I will - without a doubt - be aiming to push as much as I can out of the system (DFI NF4 Ultra-D motherboard).
So am I wasting my money going for PC4000 2x1024mb? Should I get PC3200 2x1024mb instead? Even if it's the same price, would I get better overclockability out of some PC3200 that has yet to be brought to my attention?
Or am I barking up the correct tree of thought when my reasoning is that 500mhz DDR is well worth it for maintaining 1:1 when pushing my Opty 165 to 260-300 (or whatever it ends up managing stable)?
Just need to make sure I have my ducks in a row before I jump.
Also a semi-unrelated question that really should be in the AMD forum - but I'll ask here anyways. Any major reason for looking at an Opty 170 at ~$500-520 CDN instead of an Opty 165 at ~$370-400 CDN? Anything special or proven in recent batches of the 170 that makes it a better choice?
My budget is pretty flexible here, so with valid reasoning I can make the step up (so if someone wants to tell me that a specific X2 or FX within a $600-800 CDN max budget for CPU is a better idea, let me know).
I've been looking at a variety of ~$300 CDN PC4000 3-4-4-8 / 3-4-3-8 ranged 2x1024mb kits. OCZ, Crucial, Corsair - with a lean towards OCZ.
Grabbing an Opteron 165 to go with it, and I will - without a doubt - be aiming to push as much as I can out of the system (DFI NF4 Ultra-D motherboard).
So am I wasting my money going for PC4000 2x1024mb? Should I get PC3200 2x1024mb instead? Even if it's the same price, would I get better overclockability out of some PC3200 that has yet to be brought to my attention?
Or am I barking up the correct tree of thought when my reasoning is that 500mhz DDR is well worth it for maintaining 1:1 when pushing my Opty 165 to 260-300 (or whatever it ends up managing stable)?
Just need to make sure I have my ducks in a row before I jump.
Also a semi-unrelated question that really should be in the AMD forum - but I'll ask here anyways. Any major reason for looking at an Opty 170 at ~$500-520 CDN instead of an Opty 165 at ~$370-400 CDN? Anything special or proven in recent batches of the 170 that makes it a better choice?
My budget is pretty flexible here, so with valid reasoning I can make the step up (so if someone wants to tell me that a specific X2 or FX within a $600-800 CDN max budget for CPU is a better idea, let me know).