![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
It is easily googled, no time at the moment. AMD and Intel were pushing for a form of adaptive sync as far back as 2009, it is related to Vesa standards and can be found when searching for AMDs push for adaptive sync after G-sync (they reference the push in 2009). All these backdoor loving Intel/Nvidia fanatics are ill-informed and don't care to KNOW the facts but to create them.
Are you not reading and comprehending again? Looks like it. I told you what to look for as I don't have the time at the moment.
Seriously! You claim to know everything but you don't know anything really, just create your own truth.The double standards
I await your documentation that you always demand.
You really got to stop being the word/term Nazi. My point was in regards to the tech and whether Nvidia is the inventor as you can see above, not the specific terms and meanings.
That's not inventing, it is adapting. This is Nvidia. If they invented it they would have a patent on a napkin and suing the hell out of everybody. And again they can only make claims to the module inside the monitor as far as their implementation. If you go back and look at what PSR does and its implementations you can see it doesn't take any sort of huge changes to get to the VRR we have today.
Now you're splitting hairs. It is the same thing, just the implementation is different. All solutions match the monitor refresh rate to the output of the GPU, in its selective range capability. Simply put... the same thing. How each does it is different but not that different.
Not free in the sense most make it sound. Freesync is AMDs connection or use of Adaptive sync, the VESA standard. Being a standard means that anyone who wants to use it, anyone being manufacturers, only need meet the standard set forth by VESA. I am not sure that in and of itself is free as these type of standards at least have some buy in to even get the certification. Any way the free part mostly is in regards to the cost of implementing it by a manufacturer of displays. G-sync requires the purchase of a board and certification by Nvidia before getting that label. That is usually attributed a $200 cost above what the same panel may cost without G-sync. Freesync/Adaptive sync generally have negligible costs keeping relatively equal monitors $200 apart in favor of the freesync/Adaptive sync monitor. Of course AMD choosing the name FREEsync was initially a stab at Nvidias implementation and cost to enter and possibly the closed nature of G-sync as well. That helped propel the FREE moniker as well.
Not man enough to admit defeat? Seriously? You and even Razor1 are splitting hairs just to make your point seem valid. Gsync and freesync are VRR technologies with the exact same conclusion, only the means to the end differ, and even then only slightly. If what you are trying prove ,and that is indeed what you inferred, NVidia created the VRR tech you are WRONG completely. Again proof galore just by googling, hell articles as far back as 90s of the idea and how it could work and with a few interfaces coming into existence how each would make it possible but never really coming to fruition until eDP 1.3. PSR is a form of VRR however more akin to v-sync than adaptive sync. But the manipulation of the Vblank interval is what made it possible. NVidia was first to market, albeit the slowest race ever, no one here denies that. However they didn't invent VRR just their interface medium. And again I am unsure who exactly pushed the original idea of PSR, only know the only 2 companies ever mentioned were AMD and Intel.
I don't understand. Could you try to state that again, but clearly this time?
It is inventing, because they don't work the same way!
G sync doesn't work like Freesync or adpative sync AT ALL, the later two work similarly though.
https://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/2373-op-ed-unproductive-battle-of-freesync-and-gsync
The extra chip for G sync synchronizes the timings of the frames from the GPU. There is actually communication going on between the GPU and the FPGA to do this.
That is not a feature of adaptive sync nor will it ever be.
I was being sarcastic. But can you explain it again?
Now here is the tricky part, see, the standard might be free, the monitor end is set and all ready for the display device's calls to the code. But that is the other part, the manufacturer, say AMD, has to write their end of the code to make the calls to the display. AMD call's what they developed Freesync and it cost AMD to develop it and it costs buyers when they buy it. There is nothing free about it. If NVidia wanted to make use of adaptive sync in VESA, they could as well, and they would have to write their code and we as buyers would pay for it.