8K Broadcasting Begins in Japan

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by Megalith, Dec 1, 2018.

  1. Megalith

    Megalith 24-bit/48kHz Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,004
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    While 4320p displays are almost nowhere to be found, that hasn’t stopped Japan from launching the latest in cutting-edge broadcasting technology: citizens who are lucky enough to own a UHD monitor and the required tuners may now watch both 4K and 8K content courtesy of Japanese broadcaster NHK. The remastered version of Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey is the first 8K UHD movie available for the service.

    It's still early days of course, since almost no one has an 8K display, and most of the people who do need a special receiver and antenna just to pick up the signal. Engadget Japan reported that Sharp began selling its first Super Hi-Vision-ready TVs with a built-in tuner last month for around $6,600. Also, HDMI 2.1 hasn't been implemented in any of these displays yet, so just getting the signal from box to TV requires plugging in four HDMI cables.
     
  2. Trepidati0n

    Trepidati0n [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,818
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    The detail on those tentacles will be amazing!
     
  3. oldmanbal

    oldmanbal [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    2,039
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    I liked the talking pink bird from the video.
     
  4. Brahmzy

    Brahmzy [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,955
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    In before the “we don’t need anything past 720p” crowd comes in...
     
    Simmonz and Ironchef3500 like this.
  5. tetris42

    tetris42 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,518
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Of course we need 8k, we just need a big enough screen to make use of it.

    027_blade_runner_theredlist.0.jpg
     
  6. GhostCow

    GhostCow [H]Lite

    Messages:
    97
    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2005
    I still see Jaggies at 4k. Somehow I doubt 8k will be enough to completely eliminate them. 128k when?
     
  7. IRSmurf

    IRSmurf 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,312
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Looking forward to 8K wall screens on every exterior wall of my home. I can move from the beaches of Pensacola to the rim of the Grand Canyon with the click of an app. Make it happen, Google/Facebook/Apple. Solve that parallax problem.
     
    Darth Kyrie likes this.
  8. glutto

    glutto Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    396
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Twenty two point two channel audio.

    The future has finally arrived.
     
    Ironchef3500 likes this.
  9. Nolan7689

    Nolan7689 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,303
    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2015
    I know it's blade runner but part of me thought of The 5th Element first.
     
  10. Ultima99

    Ultima99 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,888
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    And phone mfg's will announce useless, power sucking, 8K displays on phones in 3, 2, 1......
     
    sleepeeg3, TMCM, steakman1971 and 3 others like this.
  11. The Mad Atheist

    The Mad Atheist Gawd

    Messages:
    915
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2018
    Is I don't have anything more than 720p, close enough, and that's my phone.... :(

    You were the kid who always sat in the front row at the theaters, weren't you?
     
    motomonkey likes this.
  12. SamuelL421

    SamuelL421 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    150
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2016
    :eek: What?! How do they build a whole 8k ecosystem and not come up with a better connection option than 4 HDMI cables?
     
    Flogger23m, RealBeast and Nobu like this.
  13. ZeqOBpf6

    ZeqOBpf6 Gawd

    Messages:
    592
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2014
    This is awesome. Sports in 8k would be really cool.
     
    lostin3d likes this.
  14. TheHobbyist

    TheHobbyist Hugs Hard Johnnies [H]ard

    Messages:
    456
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Requires 4 HDMI 2.0 plugs. Sounds legit. Way to go HDMI Forum
     
  15. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    28,033
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    We do need resolutions beyond 720p.

    For Movie/TV content - however - you'd have to be sitting uncomfortably close to a very large screen (think movie theater front row neck pain zone experience) to be able to see the difference between 1080p and 4k. And 8K is just retarded.

    4K can make sense for games if you sit really close to a large screen like I do, but for movies and TV it's just kinda dumb, and puts more load on networks really for no reason.
     
    Red Falcon likes this.
  16. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    28,033
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    You see jaggies in Movies and TV? I kind of doubt that. Aliasing really isn't a problem in Movies and TV at any common resolution.

    In locally raster rendered content (like in games) of course you do, but pumping up the resolution is the absolutely worst way to solve the aliasing problem here. It's many times more computationally expensive than a good antialiasing algorithm.
     
    sleepeeg3 likes this.
  17. RealBeast

    RealBeast Gawd

    Messages:
    648
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Yeah, just keep raining on the Seagate/WD/[insert favorite LAN product producer] parade.

    Of course we f###ing need 2^12k video so that we need more storage and 10Tbs LAN.

    Better yet, just give us some kick ass brain implants.

    Progress man. ;)
     
  18. aaronspink

    aaronspink [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,832
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Eh, not when they are going to do like 10 FPS. As it is, 720p@60 is vastly better than 1080p@30.
     
  19. tetris42

    tetris42 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,518
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    It's often the only way is the problem:

    FXAA / SMAA = doesn't cover single pixel areas which causes the most flicker to begin with
    MSAA = Often not even included, doesn't cover alpha textures or areas with certain shader usage
    Mixed mode MSAA / SSAA = Almost never included now, doesn't cover some distance aliasing situations
    SSAA = Rarely included, haven't been able to force since DX11
    Downsampling = Inefficient, works on almost all games.
     
    GhostCow likes this.
  20. sfsuphysics

    sfsuphysics I don't get it

    Messages:
    13,685
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    Lucky enough? I mean crap go to Costco I think they only sell 4k TVs now, you can get older models without XLED technology or HDR for under $400. They're not exactly rare as they used to be.

    That said, I'm not exactly holding my breath over 4k in the US, I mean even if by some manner they did put it out, you know they'd charge you an arm and a leg for it, I mean christ I think every major TV provider from Comcast to DirecTV charges $10/month for "HD channels" still unless you managed to get in on a special promo they had.
     
  21. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    28,033
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    Cable is a shrinking market in the U.S. They are unlikely to invest in 4K, unless they think that can reverse their fortunes, which I don't think it can.
     
  22. lostin3d

    lostin3d [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    2,001
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2016
    space invaders in 8k!
     
    Denjoy, clockdogg and The Mad Atheist like this.
  23. WBurchnall

    WBurchnall 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,616
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    I'm not sure about that. My girlfriend just got a new 4k 55nu8000 Samsung ultra HDTV to replace a 1080p 43 inch from just five years ago. The difference in details one can see are noticeable. Watching a 4k movie or episode is quite different than a 1080p or 720p episode of elementary was on the old TV.

    Even at 10 feet away viewing distance and only a 55 inch screen, the difference is clear. 4k is worth it for clarity, color and contrast over 1080p TVs of even five years ago.
     
    RinkiDInk likes this.
  24. N4CR

    N4CR 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,709
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Seen it solved with 12x4k 40k lumen projectors in a 180ft diameter dome run by 6xP6000s in unreal engine before, if you're up for that install I'll put you in contact with someone who can set it up for you ;) (it has been done twice ever and is not commercially viable, but the most impressive visual setup I've ever seen hands down).

    Its the limitation of the receiver chips, just too hard to get them inside your product before release in current stock. Latest Dp standard can handle it though but again low volume production from realtek means you won't see them until next year in volume.
     
    IRSmurf likes this.
  25. Brahmzy

    Brahmzy [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,955
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    LOL
    You could not be any more wrong about movies and TV content. Night and day difference from 1080p content to native UHD on my 75.
    I told you they would come in here!
     
    WBurchnall likes this.
  26. Caeden

    Caeden n00b

    Messages:
    22
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    The truly ironic thing here is that 8K's usefulness is for just about everything except video!
    But here are some legit reasons for 8K, even on smallish screens:

    1) Textures. We have had life-like color for a while now, and with HDR we are beginning to see life-like contrast. What we have never had (ever!) is life-like texture. Back before the 80s film quality was so low that we had film texture which is an art form itself, but not life-like. In the 80s-90s film got significantly smaller and up to a roughly 4k quality resolution (which is why 4k was a thing looooooong before bluray as a digital film archive format), and while this gave directors the ability to make things 'less filmey', it was still out of reach of 'life-like'. Then we had digital capture which was at first plagued with digital grain, and poor capture compression, but over the last 20 years that has been sorted out and we can now have crisp clean video capture, but the resolution of 4k is just not quite enough to make things life-like yet. But on a high resolution phone, or on a small 4k computer display we start to see the effects of these super high texture looks and it is a very different feel than the big screen. 8k will allow us to bring the cell phone expierence to the livingroom, which will be great! It is not about seeing individual pixels; It is about giving directors options to be as lifelike or cartooney or filmey as they want, and giving audiences ways to view it.

    2) Text. As I look at my 4k computer monitor at roughly 110dpi text has problems. Computers are still designed around 72dpi content, and when you start going to higher resolutions text all just runs together. You can turn on display scaling, but then you loose screen realestate. I really like 40-46" for computer use as it is just a really useful size for multitasking on a single monitor. But at 1080p the resolution is too big to use the space. At 4k you have a useful resolution, but no better pixel density than we have had since the CRT days. At 8k ~40" with display scaling we can finally have a single display that fills the field of view with a useful screen realestate, and with crisp text and textures that are easy on the eyes.

    And that is with Romanized characters. I can only imagine with asian script just how difficult it could be to decipher between kanji. And how text as an art form is just butchered on a normal display. 8k will go a long way towards fixing this, and is likely why Japan and China are pushing for higher resolution displays before the US and Europe.

    3) Manufacturing. Back in the days of early LCD televisions one of the largest hurtles was brightness. Getting a backlight bright enough to evenly light a large display was extremely difficult unless you had very large gates to let the light through. 1080p was not expensive because the panel was hard to make; it was because the backlights were problematic. But that then introduced ghosting and performance issues. With LED backlights this fixed a ton of things, and now backlighting the display is one of the least of our problems. Brighter backlights mean we can have smaller and easier to manufacture gates to let the light through, and these smaller gates are more capable of closing entirely and reducing backlight bleed. With a demand for better and larger pictures, it became far easier to just make smaller gates and smaller pixels, so manufacturing moved to 4k well before the content did. I suspect we will see a similar move to 8k, especially for larger displays. We may all still be watching 1080p content on these huge 8k displays, but the manufacturing process will make is too affordable not to make the switch. Plus it will give the same light control and gate reaction times that we have enjoyed on sub-60" displays to the large screen market which still suffers from ghosting.

    4) Demand. Consumers are not demanding 8k, as 1080p (or lower) is still 90+% of the content being consumed. But customers are demanding HDR and ever larger screens. So if you have an 8k display you can start to do some interesting tricks for HDR with limiting the number of active pixels to produce dark scenes. The pixels are so small on a normal sized screen and viewing distance that you will never know the pixels are off. Then, when you need the brightness you open everything up and tan the audience! And this can be done more easily with cheaper backlights rathe rthan needing 500+ local array dimming. And for the demand of ever larger displays, the ease of manufacturing smaller pixels will allow the 60"+ market to drop in price significantly.

    Anywho; Point is that there are lots of reasons to move to 8k other than content resolution. NHK is just trying to get the ball rolling as soon as possible.
     
    Pocatello and WBurchnall like this.
  27. Brahmzy

    Brahmzy [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,955
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    Bring 8K and bring HDMI 2.1. Make a killer 85” FALD panel for not $15K.
     
  28. ecuador

    ecuador Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    206
    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    If your eye has a 1 arcsec resolution (from personal experience mine has probably a bit less), for a 100" 8k screen you would need to be at 1m to appreciate the resolution. Which is absurd.
    I mean, I can see how 8k media itself might have a use. E.g. for archival purposes, it can hold the full detail of a 65mm negative vertically mounted negative (like Panavision 70 etc - the Imax 70 is horizontally mounted going to up to 12k), or for allowing you to zoom in. But an 8k home display is absurd, for the reason noted above. I mean I can see a big computer monitor in 8k having uses for some professionals, the absurd thing is a 8k TV or video monitor.
    And I just know that down the line somebody's going to put 8k on a phone display and boast about it.
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2018
  29. Paul_Johnson

    Paul_Johnson [H] Admin Staff Member

    Messages:
    15,606
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    This is going to be heavily tv set to tv set dependent. The 4k set we have with the same source material doesn't give any better picture than what you find to be an ancient 1080p plasma set at any viewable distance or angle in the living room. So, the plasma remains until it dies it seems.
     
    sleepeeg3 likes this.
  30. ///AMG

    ///AMG 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,069
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Man I would just like full 1080p on cable/satellite. The local cable sports channel in Houston are 720p. I'm not even going to dream about 4k for cable tv.
     
  31. motomonkey

    motomonkey [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,419
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    They won't upgrade the infrastructure to true 1080p! I just have to roll my eyes every time I see a provider in the US go on about all the HD channels they have compressed as shit 720, sure. and that's as good as it's ever going to be.
     
  32. piscian18

    piscian18 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    11,021
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    sort of, cable will have 4k but not substantially over legacy qam. its too expensive to deploy. Its money better spent on higher modulation docsis channels for data and then deploying 4k over iptv. Its more a matter of making that painful transistion off legacy qam video.
     
  33. Bigbacon

    Bigbacon [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,648
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    i haven[t even moved to 4k yet.

    4k wil never happen in the US. Look how long it took to get any kind of HD here. Plus even if they did it would be a massive up charge on your bill.
     
  34. BloodyIron

    BloodyIron 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,443
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Too bad Red Digital Cinema is privately held, otherwise this would be a good time to buy ;)
     
  35. BloodyIron

    BloodyIron 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,443
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Traditional cable and satellite broadcasters haven't innovated for decades. Just look at the force fed cable bundles.

    4K is alive and well in the USA, and it's on services like Netflix and Emby ;)

    Oh and in Canada too

     
  36. Bigbacon

    Bigbacon [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,648
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    Sorry i meant by traditional content providers.
     
  37. sfsuphysics

    sfsuphysics I don't get it

    Messages:
    13,685
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    I tell you what I was going gaga over the PBS stations OTA when I first put an antenna on the roof. Uncompressed 1080p yuuuuum.
     
  38. sfsuphysics

    sfsuphysics I don't get it

    Messages:
    13,685
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    FYI humans have on the order of 1 arcminute resolution not 1 arcsecond. You physically could not have 1 arcsecond resolution unless your pupil was about 140mm wide, and that's a hard limit due to the laws of physics not something "better eyesight" determines.

    1 arcsecond would be like seeing a separation of 1mm at a distance of 200 meters. Or 5 microns at 1 meter which is like a large bacteria
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2018
    dgz and ecuador like this.
  39. power666

    power666 [H]Lite

    Messages:
    65
    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2018
    8K does not have to be that big. More like my attachment.

    For home usage yes but for theaters there are already a couple that have migrated to 8K LED walls. The great thing about those is that while the industry is still working on a standard 8K distribution method, any sort of standard would need the backend upgraded, not the display itself since they are inherently disjoined.
     

    Attached Files:

  40. aaronspink

    aaronspink [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,832
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    they are 720p@60fps instead of 1080p@30fps. 720p is actually significantly better for sports because of the increased framerate.