![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
Thats exactly what I plan to do. Been using this 3090 for 2 years now. Now the 4090 is a perfect 4k/120hz gaming card....no doubt about it. It would totally be badass for my Oled. But, I think I will wait for awhile and see what AMD has. Plus as of right now there isnt a game where I want upgrade for.
55FPS on Path of Exile
I am still gaming on mine!!!! LOL...According to my history with my 1060 6GB, my 3070 should be good until 2030.
Still sitting pretty with a 1080.
yes
Yep, it is. Checking out the charts at https://babeltechreviews.com/rtx-4090-performance-45-games-vr-pro-apps-benchmarked/4/, their 12900k system with ddr5 is bottlenecking in some 4k gaming tests. A prime example is Spider-Man where even with raytracing, it's still happening. Many reviewers are using inadequate cpus too.
Time for 6k or 8k monitors! Haha.
Looks like Nvidia might finally have released the first 8k gaming card right?!?!? lol
significantly lower than elsewhere numbers, seem to be a low sample size of game with a significant amount of them being CS:GO and Valorant that were doing over 500 fps already on previous gen at 4K.
Indeed, does show how much latency you add with it in a giant rendering workload game like CyberPunk
yeah that is how I always felt, I upgrade my system to match my monitor, as having a monitor that is not being taken full advantage of is leaving performance on the table.
This is a chicken or the egg type of issue, maybe no one games at 4k because there was no GPUs that could really push 4k at high frames, now apparently there is, so perhaps those 4k monitors will make more sense now.
almost 4% on the 3440x1440-3840x2160, some others and some TV connected not being the main monitor catched by steam I can imagine, on 120 millions users bases that a lot of people relative to the 4090 possible market share.
Considering Intel card that were built a while ago have them, Raptor Lake iGPU seem to have them, it make little sense to me, why DLSS 3.0 without DP 2.0, that said some of the 4k-240hz monitor outthere:
I have had a 4K display for years now. Top end cards push just fine especially with Adaptive Sync. I do get what you are saying though, however as I said earlier, if you want super high frames with 4K, then why is 4090 not a DisplayPort 2.0 card?
While it is a tiny fraction the raw percentages don't tell the whole story.
It is to find test about it online (or my google skills are down), considering how much console can get away with it would be an interesting test to do. (and native vs non-native can make actual testing really hard which could be the reason), I imagine it depends on how good your eyes are the minutes you are remotely removed from the monitor.
4K TVs work well for streaming. Any time I sit close to the TV for a sports game you can tell how it's not even close to 4K quality. Sitting many feet away on the couch makes it much less noticeable.
if you use 1080p it is probably match made in heaven
Movie and TV signal are so compressed that I am not sure how low in the list resolution would be in term of quality, under 50 mbits it seem quite useless to go over 1080p at least before AV1 in blind test.
Exactly. Running 1080p and happy with it.
You will really like going to 1440p or 4k. It's quite a nice visual upgrade.
We are also forgetting that the FPS benchmarks for the 4090 are based off games that are available TODAY. In one to two years from now there could be games that are released that cripple anything below a 3080. I get the feeling the 4090 is the new 1080ti, not in the cost/performance aspect but more so in performance that stayed relevant for 5+ years, but relevant for the next generation of games.
I think it depends greatly on the display type. On a smaller display, I don't usually see a difference in games. 28"-32" or whatever. In other things it really depends. At 40"+, I think you'd see a pretty big difference comparing 2560x1440 to 3840x2160.
Its true, on my 42" 4k monitor, 1440p looks ugly, 4k is so much clearer. Even with the settings turned to low in 4k, 42" almost needs 4k.
Unlikely. Pretty much all major devs will use the consoles as the baseline and the 3080 should be just fine in the coming years.
Maybe it changed over time and over resolution, but those technology often have a non native vs native cost that can create a difference that people think is due to lower resolution looking much worse (also text would be a special case).
Eventually there's going to be a breaking point of real life vision to what we see on a screen.
The 3 announced 4xxx series cards have Tflops 73, 43, 35.5. The 3090, 3080 10gb, and 3060ti have tflops 29, 17.5, 14. The corresponding 4xxx cards all have about 150% more tflops than the listed 3xxx cards.
