I'm debating upgrading my 7970s in 1-3 months, and thought the 290s looked like a decent option. The plan was to stick the old cards in my old i7 920 rig and have a go at bit mining or just sell them off.
I'm not really partial to AMD, I probably would only have considered SLI had AMD not improved their frame pacing considerably, but I want to say the 290s look like a more attractive option than the GTX 770s (which honestly looks like it would be more of a side grade) and can be had cheaper than the vanilla GTX 780's.
I'm only gaming at 1080p at the moment, but trying to push 120 Hz, and while my 7970s are hardly doing a terrible job, I'm starting to feel that upgrade itch. Plus, want to be prepared for DA:I and other upcoming PC games.
Worthwhile upgrade or wait until Maxwell/Pirate Islands?
One thing to note is that neither of my 7970s are great overclockers, at least not considering the temps they already hit at stock. They're both using the reference cooler and anything more than the default fan speed just sounds like a jet engine. I've just had them sitting at their default clocks (one core 1010, the other 925 and both stock 1375 mem) because it's been more hassle than it's worth ever since I added the second card into the mix. So ideally we're comparing that with 2x 290s with aftermarket coolers and factory overclocks, something like this I would imagine.
It's being paired with a 4.2 GHz 4770k. I've managed to find a few reviews comparing it with a 7990 or 280x CF but not sure I'm getting the whole picture, especially if 290 CF scaling has been improved upon at all in more recent driver revisions than these reviews are reflecting. This TechPowerUp review for instance, doesn't always paint a pretty picture in terms of performance gains of 290x CF vs a 7990 in several games. Not sure if that was immature drivers or a CPU bottleneck. Though I think Anand's GPU bench looks more favorable (again testing 290x CF since 290 CF doesn't seem to be included).
I'm not really partial to AMD, I probably would only have considered SLI had AMD not improved their frame pacing considerably, but I want to say the 290s look like a more attractive option than the GTX 770s (which honestly looks like it would be more of a side grade) and can be had cheaper than the vanilla GTX 780's.
I'm only gaming at 1080p at the moment, but trying to push 120 Hz, and while my 7970s are hardly doing a terrible job, I'm starting to feel that upgrade itch. Plus, want to be prepared for DA:I and other upcoming PC games.
Worthwhile upgrade or wait until Maxwell/Pirate Islands?
One thing to note is that neither of my 7970s are great overclockers, at least not considering the temps they already hit at stock. They're both using the reference cooler and anything more than the default fan speed just sounds like a jet engine. I've just had them sitting at their default clocks (one core 1010, the other 925 and both stock 1375 mem) because it's been more hassle than it's worth ever since I added the second card into the mix. So ideally we're comparing that with 2x 290s with aftermarket coolers and factory overclocks, something like this I would imagine.
It's being paired with a 4.2 GHz 4770k. I've managed to find a few reviews comparing it with a 7990 or 280x CF but not sure I'm getting the whole picture, especially if 290 CF scaling has been improved upon at all in more recent driver revisions than these reviews are reflecting. This TechPowerUp review for instance, doesn't always paint a pretty picture in terms of performance gains of 290x CF vs a 7990 in several games. Not sure if that was immature drivers or a CPU bottleneck. Though I think Anand's GPU bench looks more favorable (again testing 290x CF since 290 CF doesn't seem to be included).