Just because the driver you are using limits it to 85 doesn't mean that it's "supposed" to be that way. By default in Vista 960x600 is limited to 100hz, but in XP i run it at 150hz for CS:S and the horizontal refresh is only 98hz, not even close to the limit of 121. Try the XP x64 driver once, it allows for much higher refresh rates than xp x68 and vista, which one do you "suppose" is right?
what i do know is that if you override the refresh rates on any monitor, it shortens the life of the monitor pretty good, and since the last of these monitors were made in '03, I'd make it last as long as possible because the chances of getting another one are pretty slim without paying a pretty penny.
Thats just me though
I am quite positive 95Hz is within the monitor specs (even the AccurateIT auctions show 1920x1200 at 98Hz). The reason it "maxes" at 85Hz in windows is because windows standard refresh rates are 60, 75, 85, 100, ect.
No, I didn't reset them to factory settings first.
And yes, as it was gov't surplus, I'm sure the gov just left the thing on 8-12 hours a day and it is worn. I have been able to, at this point, get the colors to be quite excellent. Been playing some BioShock, Doom 3 and F.E.A.R. and the blacks (as well as the rest of the spectrum) on them all look great (just before writing this, I was playing some Doom 3. Nothing like doom 3 in a dark room at 1900x1200 on a 24" widescreen with EAX HD enabled). I'm going to go so far as to say the picture is better than the Syncmaster 950p that it replaced (which was quite awesome in the IQ dep't).
these monitors are used by ILM, LucasArts and Pixar, so these are pretty much the best CRT's made.
I have personally not seen a better picture on any monitor better than these.
If you can get a hold of a hardware calibrator, this monitor shines in a big way.