2015 Samsung 4k TV as a Monitor Set Up Guide

Discussion in 'Displays' started by Zarathustra[H], Jul 22, 2015.

  1. Nenu

    Nenu [H]ardened

    Messages:
    18,988
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    This.

    Also note each time you unplug the HDMI cable you will need to change the setting again.
    This is so it always fails safe and you get an image on none HDMI 2.0 devices.
     
  2. Porter_

    Porter_ [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,927
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2007
    no option for UHD Color on the Q60 as far as i can tell. when i drop the refresh rate from 60hz to 30hz it allows me to select RGB and Full dynamic range. i'm starting to suspect the HDMI cable but it worked fine with my KU6300...odd.
     
  3. cybereality

    cybereality [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,801
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    I've had problems with previously working cables before.

    Might be a good idea to buy a new HDMI 2.0 cable to test with.
     
    Porter_ likes this.
  4. Nenu

    Nenu [H]ardened

    Messages:
    18,988
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    The problem is exactly as stated.
    There is an option where you can select each of the HDMI ports to enable HDMI 2.0 on them.
    On my Q9FN it is under the "General/External Device Manager" area of settings.
    Find it.

    If you dont change this you will be limited to HDMI 1.4 bandwidth no matter which cable you use, resulting in exactly the behaviour you have got.
     
    Porter_ likes this.
  5. Porter_

    Porter_ [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,927
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2007
    You’re the man Nenu. On the Q60 it’s called “Input Signal Plus” and it’s in Settings > General > External Device Manager > Input Signal Plus
     
    revenant, Nenu and cybereality like this.
  6. cybereality

    cybereality [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,801
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Glad to hear you figured it out.
     
    Porter_ likes this.
  7. nwrtarget

    nwrtarget Gawd

    Messages:
    860
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
  8. ManofGod

    ManofGod [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    11,055
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007
    Honestly, if I could do it again, I would go for a smaller QHD 144hz panel or buy something higher end, with freesync and 120hz, at least.
     
  9. cybereality

    cybereality [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,801
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    For the price looks decent. But you definitely won't be gaming at 4K on a 1050 Ti.
     
    ManofGod likes this.
  10. nwrtarget

    nwrtarget Gawd

    Messages:
    860
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    I should have been more verbose.
    I wouldn't plan to use it as a gaming monitor/setup. Life keeps me from doing much of that these days anyway.
    It would be replacing 3 27" 1920X1080 GW2760HS monitors I have presently sitting in a widescreen row on my desk. I find I don't use the far edges of the monitors as much and this setup would be narrower than my current setup meaning i would probably use the whole thing.

    I work from home so I spend both work and pleasure hours at my desk, but pleasure tends not to be gaming.

    It also looks like that my current monitor is on sale for 119 at tigerdirect so for roughly equal money I could upgrade to 6 monitors. I really don't think that would be terribly useful to me.
     
  11. alaricljs

    alaricljs Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    277
    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2011
    You're used to a dot pitch higher than even a 48" 4k would provide. Depending on your eyes and scaling preference that means you're losing even more real estate than you might suspect. I went with a 48” to maintain the DPI I'm used to coming from 2x 24" 1200p panels as best I could.

    Something to think about.
     
  12. nwrtarget

    nwrtarget Gawd

    Messages:
    860
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    I was looking at that, around 85 something right now, and a 42.6 4k would be 105.

    What 48" did you go with?
     
  13. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    28,646
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000

    Yeah, at 48" the PPI of 3840x2160 is a tad low at 48". Here is a screenshot of some example pixel densities of different resolutions and screen sizes, dating back to the old days (since the forums won't let me attach a spreadsheet)

    upload_2019-11-8_12-14-26.png

    Judging by this, for productivity type work, my conclusion has been that the ideal screen size for 4k would be in the 43" to 45" range. At 48" you are down at the level of an SVGA 1024x768 on a 14" CRT ppi. :p

    For typical desktop use, ~95 - 105 ppi seems to be the sweet spot range. I personally always found 1440p on a 27" screen a tad small, but liked my old 30" 2560x1600 screen, so even small differences here can throw you off.
     
  14. alaricljs

    alaricljs Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    277
    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2011
    Got a Sammy UN48JU6700 in Jan 2016. Only thing that I would upgrade to is a burn in proof oled in the same size.
     
  15. Lateralus

    Lateralus More [H]uman than Human

    Messages:
    14,730
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    The newer Samsung QLEDs would probably be a decent upgrade from that, but yeah, OLED would be a massive upgrade. I went from a UN48JS9000 to a 55" OLED and it's magical.
     
  16. nwrtarget

    nwrtarget Gawd

    Messages:
    860
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    Just running the math and a 55 3840x2160 is effectively the same PPI as my current 27 1920x1080 and I have no issue with this setup. This is also very interesting as the quality of sets gets much better with 55" presently and wanders into the OLED area. I find this intriguing. For the OLED gang here, what sort of things do you do to reduce burn in and all that?
     
  17. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    28,646
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000

    I'm curious. How far away do you sit from that screen? That's a PPI of 81.6. I can't imagine usi g a pixel density that low, but I also sit about arms length from my screen (~2ft)
     
  18. nwrtarget

    nwrtarget Gawd

    Messages:
    860
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    I can't touch my display, looks like 33 to 34 inches based on my tape measure.

    https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/lg/b9-oled
    I am seriously considering this...

    (if it doesn't work out my theatre room will get a new display )
     
  19. Lateralus

    Lateralus More [H]uman than Human

    Messages:
    14,730
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Black background (can also set many wallpapers to rotate, I just prefer the pitch black background for working)
    Auto-hide taskbar
    I don't run anything except games and movies/videos in full screen mode because 55" Excel spreadsheets and browser windows are crazy at this size...I typically resize my browser window to roughly the equivalent of a 40-43" monitor and move it around occasionally just so it's not sitting in the same spot for hours every day
    Set the Ribbons screensaver to kick in within a couple of minutes of me walking away
    The single biggest thing that you can do IMO is to keep the OLED light level at 20 or below. Many people do not realize this but that tip was given to me by one of the earliest PC OLED users here. Note that the OLED level is separate from the brightness control. High brightness settings don't accelerate burn-in but high OLED light levels do since it changes how hard the pixels are driven. For my room, a setting of 8-12 works very well (out of 100, which is blinding!).

    I just passed the two year mark of using this thing as a monitor and I have zero burn-in. I've been working from home since last December and have used it for 6/8/10+ hours a day almost every day (plus whatever gaming I decide to do). I did get a very mild case of image retention once when I had a Remote Desktop session open and forgot to move the window for a really long time, but it went away shortly after the screensaver kicked in. Heck, even some LCDs get image retention. It's completely normal.

    Mine is a B7 and supposedly the newer sets are even more robust because they've made changes/improvements to the OLED structure. The newer ones (9 series and up) have VRR/G-Sync compatibility and should also do 120Hz at 4K when cards with HDMI 2.1 come out. Mine does 120Hz but only at 1080 or 1440. LG is supposed to release a 48" version next year and I'll be jumping all over that. Can't go back to LCD.
     
  20. nwrtarget

    nwrtarget Gawd

    Messages:
    860
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    My $300 to $400 monitor upgrade is starting to look like a $1200 monitor upgrade.

    Time to check the Black Friday ads to see if I can find a 55" OLED.
     
  21. cybereality

    cybereality [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,801
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    I wouldn't get a 55" to use as a monitor. It is impractical and uncomfortable for working on.

    I used to have a 40" Samsung 4K and that was manageable, but not ideal, for desktop usage. Then I upgraded to a 55", which looked great for gaming, but was too big for anything else.

    You'll have to make windows smaller and physically turn your head around to see parts of the screen. It is not very comfortable.

    If you're set on a 4K TV, probably stay in the 40-43" range, I think that will be better.
     
  22. nwrtarget

    nwrtarget Gawd

    Messages:
    860
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    My current set up is 60 inches (5 feet) wide. The outer monitors are angled towards me which makes it ONLY 5 feet wide. I like the setup, but want more vertical pixels, and ideally would like my monitors to be a bit taller, but not wider, assuming I stay triple head. I sit farther away from my monitors than many of you.

    There are other triple head setups that I would consider and I am looking for at least 1440 pixels instead of my current 1080. I wouldn't go down to one single 32 as that just doesn't work for how I use my monitors. I do have to turn my head now to use the far edges and don't find that annoying. I tend to use the outer panels for monitoring things, and then bring the active windows more central for work. The downside of triple head is that means the central monitor gets overloaded with windows where in the case of a large TV I could just fan out from the central focus point. If I had a single large TV I would be farther back from it, probably 35 to 40 inches. I am getting older so being only 24 inches from my monitor is getting more difficult and I expect that to get worse over the next few years.

    My desk is a 6 foot by 8 foot corner desk, not facing into a corner. It is like a massive V standing out from the wall. I could mount the TV on the Wall which would put it about 4 feet from my eyes. I would use a full motion mount (if I went that way) to make it easy to adjust and connect stuff.

    The reason I am posting in this thread though is because I find this option intriguing. I have massive space for my desk and can build things in that space as required. I have a 9 foot ceiling and at least a 12 foot wall. I would rather spend less than a grand, but to get an OLED setup, it would be worth the extra few hundred.

    I am trying to get a feel for how dumb this is, within the context that I already have a big setup that would be considered dumb in it's own right.

    I appreciate the feedback, keep it coming. I am not set on a TV as I know it has downsides, however the cost to performance ratio is intriguing especially looking at $1500 for a 55inch OLED C9 (or the cheaper $1300 B9 as my usage may not benefit from GSync). I do value good color and black level performance.
     
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2019
  23. Lateralus

    Lateralus More [H]uman than Human

    Messages:
    14,730
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    That's plenty of distance. And if you can do away with some bezels by going to the TV, even better. At 4K there is lots of room for applications.
     
  24. cybereality

    cybereality [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,801
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    I used to run triple 27" 1440p. It was very nice for programming, I could have multiple apps open on each screen. Not sure anything beats that for productivity.

    Also had a 40" Samsung 4K and then a 55" QLED on my gaming rig. The 40" was nice, and I jumped to 55" to get HDR and FreeSync, but it was only really good for games and movies (I've since moved this screen to the living room).

    If you are not doing a lot of gaming/movies, you may want to consider an ultrawide. That is what I use now on my main rig (34" 2560x1080). I would not recommend 1080p, it's pretty skimpy for working on, but I do like a single larger screen.

    I would say take a look at the 3440x1440 or 3840x1600 35" kits. That should be more than enough space for working on, but not so huge that it is an ergonomic issue. Looking side to side is fine (like triple head) but looking up is uncomfortable.

    With the ultrawide, the vertical space is all within your vision mostly so it is easier to work with. Or, if you want the 4K TV, maybe start with a cheaper one like the Vizio and see if you like it before dropping a grand.
     
  25. Nenu

    Nenu [H]ardened

    Messages:
    18,988
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Sit further away, this is the advantage of a larger screen.
    Its much much easier on the eyes for long sessions.
    The TV doesnt need to be on the same table as your mouse and keyboard.
    Get a table/surface for the TV that is slightly lower so its further away and you can put the bottom of the bezel at the height of your desk.
    You see more detail despite being further away if you keep the same screen size in your view.
    Thank me later.

    It baffles me why so many people think you must put the TV in front of your nose, disregarding really good options.
     
  26. cybereality

    cybereality [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,801
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Well my eyesight is not what it used to be, I mostly have the screen within 1 foot from my face.

    Yes, you can move the screen further out, but then you'll need to increase the scaling to make it usable (unless you have really good vision).

    I guess everyone's setup is different. For me 55" was way too big, but I know some people here make it work.
     
  27. Nenu

    Nenu [H]ardened

    Messages:
    18,988
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    A major point of a larger screen is you dont have to change anything when you put the screen further away.
    It appears the same size in your field of view, because thats what you are used to and what you want. It is how you will set it up.
    You can even put it a bit closer than that without inducing eyestrain.
     
  28. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    28,646
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000

    Depends on what you are buying and why.

    Every time I have increased screen size starting with my 13" 640x480 VGA screen until today with my 48" 4k TV it has been at the same time as increasing resolution because I wanted more desktop real estate.

    Why would you want your screen further away anyway?
     
    cybereality likes this.
  29. Nenu

    Nenu [H]ardened

    Messages:
    18,988
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Less eye strain.
     
  30. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    28,646
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    Hmm. I've never experienced eye strain from a screen. Or from anything else

    At least I think so.

    What is the experience like?
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2019
  31. Nenu

    Nenu [H]ardened

    Messages:
    18,988
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Over a long enough period of viewing time an ache develops.
    If it isnt given enough time away, it happens faster and can result in a more serious problem.
    I decided when it started happening to me a lot to get a projector and what a difference, so relaxing and easy.
    That sold me on large displays at a distance.
     
  32. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    28,646
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000

    Interesting.

    I've never experienced it.

    Is this an issue you've always had, or has it developed over time?
     
  33. Nenu

    Nenu [H]ardened

    Messages:
    18,988
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    For a long time, not an issue, I used to code until the early hours from age 13 on school days.
    Age takes its toll, close focus isnt as easy as it was.
    My eyesight is otherwise superb.
     
  34. nwrtarget

    nwrtarget Gawd

    Messages:
    860
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    Getting old isn't fun, but most available evidence says it is better than the alternative. Part of getting old is the cornea loses flexibility and bringing near things into focus gets more difficult. This typically starts in the 40's. Being in my 40's I can say that this is true!
     
  35. nwrtarget

    nwrtarget Gawd

    Messages:
    860
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    I took the plunge. I found a LG OLED 55" B8 (2018 model) on Craigslist for $700. Seller bought it in August from Dell, he provided the receipt.

    It is up and running on my desk right now, but I am just getting started setting it up for the purpose. Looks pretty awesome though. More updates once I get it set up closer to reality.
     
    Porter_ and cybereality like this.