1366 with SATA2 connectors only. Samsung Evo coming. Need a bootable SATA3 card?

Discussion in 'SSDs & Data Storage' started by ScYcS, Feb 17, 2014.

  1. ScYcS

    ScYcS 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,952
    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    To make a long story short: I have a 1366 board with SATA2 connectors only. I now have a Samsung Evo drive on it's way, which can sustain some pretty high transfer rates.

    Would i benefit from a bootable SATA3 card to make the most of my new drive or is the SATA2 connector on my Asus mobo sufficient?

    If new card, which simple, cheap card would you recommend?
     
  2. Darakian

    Darakian [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,699
    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Probably not. Lower latency from the on chip sata will probably be worth more than the higher throughput of a sata3 card. That said, do you expect 300MB/s to be a bottle neck?
     
  3. ScYcS

    ScYcS 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,952
    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    No, not really a bottleneck, it's just that i hate buying something that i can't take full advantage of. Similar to buying a $600 videocard and your processor keeps your FPS at 40....
     
  4. Darakian

    Darakian [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,699
    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    You should try a pci express 3 card in a pci express 2 slot. Still works a treat ;)
     
  5. faugusztin

    faugusztin 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,635
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2008
    You won't be able to take "full advantage" of it anyway. Pretty much all PCIe cards will limit your SATA3 speeds to something like 400MB/s or so, instead of the 500-550MB/s you should be getting from these SSD drives.

    In short - it is pointless waste of money to buy a SATA3 card for a 1366 system, or to use the Marvell SATA3 ports if you have them on board.
     
  6. ScYcS

    ScYcS 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,952
    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Nope, my P6T Deluxe V2 has only SATA2 ports.
     
  7. Black5Lion

    Black5Lion Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    325
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    I use Crucial M4 on my sata2-only 775 system, and I'm not regretting it :)
    It's definitely faster than any HDD, and I can't notice any real difference between the ssd in my rig and the ssd in my brother's (sata3).
     
  8. jmilcher

    jmilcher [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,153
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Sata II will be just fine.
     
  9. drescherjm

    drescherjm [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,297
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    The answer is most likely no. Most SATA III cards (unless you spend $400+ to get an SSD optimized card) will actually decrease your performance slightly (higher latency with lower IOPS = slightly worse 4K performance) in most real world applications including games. SATA III will increase performance in benchmarks that measure large sequential reads and writes however most real world applications do not read or write GB files sequentially.
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2014
  10. Old Hippie

    Old Hippie [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,013
    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2005
    Yep, you'll be just fine.
     
  11. fantabulous

    fantabulous Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    229
    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2013
    If you've got an X8 or longer slot free, one of those rebranded LSI 2008 cards like the IBM M1015 or Dell H200 is pretty nice to have. Probably extreme overkill for a single SSD, but not terribly expensive.

    As has already been noted, though, SATA 2 is fine.