Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
UrielDagda said:I would be happy if they could design an LCD that can have a MAX of 10ms.. That would allow for up to 100Hz... But even the so-called "4ms" LCDs today still take around 20ms to go full spectrum.
My best guess would be: possibly. With my limited knowledge of quantum physics, I do not want to exclude something that a traditional view would say is impossible.JVC said:when will there be 0ms response time lcds?
v6maro said:isn't there another technology coming out called SED, which eliminates response time, and it's basically a flat tube with perfect blacks and 180* viewing angle? The holy grail is coming...
tisb0b said:yeah all the benefits of CRT without any of the drawbacks
Ryom said:Except the weight of the glass and a likely a static charge as well. Get out the duster again
Ryom said:Except the weight of the glass and a likely a static charge as well. Get out the duster again
tisb0b said:yeah all the benefits of CRT without any of the drawbacks
Ryom said:Except the weight of the glass and a likely a static charge as well. Get out the duster again
v6maro said:I can live with that, trust me.
tisb0b said:but there will be 1ms response time lcds
Well now we have tech way better than that I mean I am replying 14 years later but yeah and r u still pwning my mom like theres no tomorrowisn't there another technology coming out called SED, which eliminates response time, and it's basically a flat tube with perfect blacks and 180* viewing angle? The holy grail is coming...
Well glad to say over 14 years later not a problem anymoreExcept the weight of the glass and a likely a static charge as well. Get out the duster again
View attachment 323687
It is kind of said reading back and seeing the hopium for SED panels, though. Funny how OLED wasn't even a factor in this discussion, which has <0.1ms response time. The first consumer OLED display came out a year after this thread.
No we do not. Not even real 1msim 14 year late to responding but now we have 0.1
This, thanks for posting, most don't understand the pixel response time is basically more effective route than refresh rate and this shows why. OLED or similar any day over archaic backlit LCD BS.No we do not. Not even real 1ms
View attachment 324590
This monitor can do 1ms on some transitions at the expense of introducing ridiculous overdrive errors.
TN panels might be slightly faster but nowhere near 0.1ms and frankly having some specific transitions fast and some of them slow doesn't make display faster as much as make blurring that happens less consistent.
As for OLED it looks like this
View attachment 324591
So no 0.1ms and it is not LCD as mentioned in OP
What is even worse many of todays LCD monitors have actually response times that are not that different than what we had in 2006 (of course fastest models). Some monitors do, most do not. What we have is higher refresh rates and since response times improve with refresh rate it is the main improvement.
My first LCD was an envision model off a hot deal. It was 15" 1024x768 and had a response time of 50ms. That's right... 50!